THE STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT: A STAKEHOLDERS’ PERSPECTIVE

Authors

  • ELIZABETH H. ALONZO PhD Isabela State University-Cabagan Author
  • MATRONILLO M. MARTIN EdD Ifugao State University-Potia Campus, Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/ts8xxr54

Keywords:

strengths, weaknesses, SBM, stakeholders, perspectives

Abstract

The study unravels the implementation of School-Based Management (SBM) in Alfonso Lista District 1 and 2, Division of Ifugao. The study employed the qualitative research method through in-depth interview among the participants of the study which also used transcription. This also used the triangulation in order to penetrate details and commentaries among the participants of the study. The strengths of the implementation of SBM in both districts are categorized in two discrete yet dominating themes: the value of cooperation and motivation; and the worth of collaboration and delegation. As regards the weaknesses, it includes the poor enactment of transparency and low value of support mechanism. As to the remedial measures, consultative meeting, administrative protocol and open communication and decision making as the heart of the organization were utilized. Furthermore, SBM acknowledges school heads as frontiers of its implementation and enforces stakeholders’ involvement as well.The administrators developed mechanisms to perform leadership tasks in order to employ good governance particularly on decision-making, planning and monitoring. These administrators have continuously integrated core values as the heart of managing the school. In terms of fiscal management, the administrators considered the critical effects of transparency and support among the teachers and stakeholders.Proper Monitoring and evaluation tool must b designed by the school head to identify the schools’ priorities and needs; proper technical assistance must be provided. Faculty staff and stakeholder’ development must be initiated in both 2 districts to reinforce the harmonious relationships among them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Abshire, Martha, et.al. (2017) Participant Retention Practices in Longitudinal Clinical Research Studies with High Retention Rate. Official Retrieved on February 26, 2018.

2. Anderson, C., & Limerick, B (2006). Female Administrators and School-Based Management: New Models in An Era of Change? Education Management &Administration, vol. 27, no. 4, pp 401-414.

3. Bandur, A. (2012). School-Based Management Developments: Challenges and Impacts. Journal of Education Administration, 50 (5), 845-873.

4. Brady, H, (2008) School-Based Management (SBM) as a Factor in School Effectiveness. International Review of Education, 44 no 4, p.319-333.

5. Crum C.M & Sherman S.H. (2008). Book review of Improving schools through teacher development: Case Studies of the Aga Kahn Foundation projects in the East Africa, School effectiveness and school improvement, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 233-245

6. Cruz, P. T. (2010). School-Based Management (SBM) Transparency. Retrieved November from Forum Magazine, Volume 43 and Number 2, pages 35-38; 434.

7. Demir, H.L. (2008). School Head Roles: Comprehensive School Reform and Achievement: A Meta- Analysis. Review of Educational and Research, 73 (2), 125-230.

8. Dempster, N. (2000). Guilty or not: The Impact and Effects of Site-Based Management on schools. Journal of Educational Administration, vol. 38, Number. 1, p. 476.

9. DepEd. (2006). Operations Manual on School-Based Management (SBM) and its Support Systems. January 9, 2006. Pasig City: Department of Education (DepEd)

10. Gardner, M. A. (2014). The Examples of Current Issues in the Multicultural Classroom. Journal of Education and Practice Vol.6, No.10. Retrieved from E R I C Database. (EJ1081654)

11. Gertler, J.K., Patrinos, S.F. & Codina, R.D. (2006). The School Management System and the Current Trends of Education. Journal of Management Education. Volume 5, No.8., retrieved on January 30, 2018 at http://www/management.system.portal.

12. Lacambra, M.( 2020). Factors of Excellence among Science Proficient University Students. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation. Volume 24. Issue 3: 2235-2248

13. Manera, A.(2019). Textual Analysis of School Graffiti. The Asian EFL Journal. The ELE Publication. Volume 21,Issue 2.3.: 273-284

14. Meyer, D (1996). Multilingualism and Multiculturalism in the Swedish-Medium Primary School Classroom in Finland - Some Teacher Views. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 6(1), 117-136. Retrieved from ERIC Database. (EJ1053773).

15. Morefield, N.K. (2007). The Decentralization of Education: Why, When, What and How? Fundamentals of Educational Planning and Management Volume IX, no. 6 p. 64.

16. Neal, R. (2012) School Based Management: A Detailed Guide for Successful Implementation Review. Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service.

17. Oswald C. B. (2014). The Female Administrators and School-Based Management: New Models in An Era of Change? Education Management & Administration, Vol. 27, no. 4, pages 401-414.

Downloads

Published

30.06.2020

How to Cite

ALONZO , E. H., & MARTIN, M. M. (2020). THE STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT: A STAKEHOLDERS’ PERSPECTIVE. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(6), 12808-12819. https://doi.org/10.61841/ts8xxr54