Triple bottom line as a tool for Organizational Job commitment of Employees: Mediating role of Self Esteem

Authors

  • Ahmad Bilal Khilji PhD Scholar: Bahria University (Lahore Campus) Author
  • Naseer Haider Cheema M.S Business Administration: Institute of Banking and Finance BZU, Multan Author
  • Farzana Noreen MBA Professional Capital University of Science & Technology Islamabad Author
  • Amina Faheem PhD Scholar: Institute of Management Sciences, BZU, Multan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/zz2nwq77

Keywords:

Triple bottom line, self-esteem, organizational job commitment, sustainability, human resource practices

Abstract

The study extends the literature of the evolving concept of sustainability to address the importance of the novel stance presented here in the form of the triple bottom line, which is an interrelated concept of sustainability, and prescribes that organizations resolve to concentrate on social and natural concerns similarly as they do on benefits. The thought that we can deal with an organization in a manner that gains monetary benefits as well as improves individuals' lives and the planet. The triple bottom line construct through the lens of the human resource perspective broadens the scope of sustainability. This investigation, with each dimension of the TBL structure studied separately under the positivism stance, highlights that sustainability is not only considered in the exterior performance of the organization, but it is also a component for internal dynamism to apply to the workforce for their commitment, which encourages the organizational performance that leads towards sustainable development. The data was collected from the manufacturing sector of South Punjab, the second largest industrial region of Pakistan. The approved survey was utilized for the collection of data from 151 out of 170 respondents. The simple random sampling technique was applied to supervisors, team leaders, foremen, and other first-line managers. The multiple regression analysis, Pearson correlation, and mediation Hayes process were run, which shows that triple bottom line practices have a significant impact on the job commitment of employees. The triple bottom line practices have a significant impact on the self-esteem of employees, and self-esteem mediates the relation between TBL and the job commitment of employees. The study is useful and prolific for strategic human resource affairs, policymakers, and other stakeholders of the organizations. The study will open the new induction of strategic human resource practices in the future for replacing low-effective employee-related practices with result-oriented practices. The limitations of the study are also discussed. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Lopez-Cabrales, A., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2019). Sustainable HRM strategies and employment relationships as drivers of the triple bottom line. Human Resource Management Review, 100689.

2. Agrawal, S., & Singh, R. K. (2019). Analyzing disposition decisions for sustainable reverse logistics: Triple BottomLine approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 150, 104448.

3. Ng, J. H., & Page, A. (2019). Revised reality therapy. Multicultural Counseling Applications for Improved Mental Healthcare Services, 64-83. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-6073-9.ch004

4. Epstein, M. J. (2018). Leadership and strategy for corporate sustainability. Making Sustainability Work, 58- 84. doi:10.4324/9781351280129-3.

5. Ćulibrk, J., Delić, M., Mitrović, S., & Ćulibrk, D. (2018). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment and job involvement: The mediating role of job involvement. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00132.

6. Vega-Mejía, C. A., Montoya-Torres, J. R., & Islam, S. M. (2017). Consideration of triple bottom line objectives for sustainability in the optimization of vehicle routing and loading operations: A systematic literature review. Annals of Operations Research, 273(1-2), 311-375. doi: 10.1007/s10479-017-2723-9

7. Ecker, W., & Schreiner, J. (2016). Metamodeling and code generation in the Springer Science+Business media Dordrecht. Handbook of Hardware/Software Codesign, 1-41. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-7358-4_32-1.

8. Valentine, C. (2015). Greening HRD: Conceptualizing the Triple Bottom Line for HRD Practice, Teaching, and Research Advances in developing Human Resources page(s): 426-441.

9. Berrone, P., Fosfuri, A., Gelabert, L., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2013). Necessity as the mother of ‘green’ inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 34(8), 891-909. doi:10.1002/smj.2041.

10. Alfred, A. M., & Adam, R. F. (2009). Green management matters regardless. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 17-26. doi:10.5465/amp.2009.43479261.

11. Aguinis, H., & Kraiger, K. (2009). Benefits of training and development for individuals and teams, organizations, and society. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 451-474. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163505.

12. Aragón-Correa, J. A., García-Morales, V. J., & Cordón-Pozo, E. (2007). Leadership and organizational learning's role on innovation and performance: Lessons from Spain. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(3), 349359. Doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.09.006

13. Aragón-Correa, J. A., Hurtado-Torres, N., Sharma, S., & García-Morales, V. J. (2008). Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(1), 88-103. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.022

14. Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2009). Making sustainable development sustainable. Management Decision, 47(6), 975-988. doi:10.1108/00251740910966686

15. Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., Byrne, J. C., & Aren, S. (2007). Emotional and learning capability and their impact on product innovativeness and firm performance. Technovation, 27(9), 501-513. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2007.03.001

16. Alberti, M., Caini, L., Calabrese, A., & Rossi, D. (2000). Evaluation of the costs and benefits of an environmental management system. International Journal of Production Research, 38(17), 4455-4466. doi:10.1080/00207540050205226

17. Aragon-Correa, J. A. (1998). Research notes. Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5), 556-567. doi:10.2307/256942

18. Hidayati, N. D. (2011). Pattern of corporate social responsibility programs: A case study. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(1), 104-117. doi:10.1108/17471111111114576

19. Holahan, P. J., Sullivan, Z. Z., & Markham, S. K. (2013). Product development as core competence: How formal product development practices differ for radical, more innovative, and incremental product innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 329-345. doi:10.1111/jpim.12098

20. Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future—Call for action. Environmental Conservation, 14(4), 291-294. doi:10.1017/s0376892900016805

21. Jones, N. W. (2015). The Bible and literature: The basics. Routledge.

22. Lippman, E. (2010). Case study on sustainability: Accountants’ role in developing a new business model. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1662648

23. Pagell, M., & Shevchenko, A. (2014). Why research in sustainable supply chain management should have no future. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(1), 44-55. doi:10.1111/jscm.12037

24. Prajogo, D., K.Y. Tang, A., & Lai, K. (2014). The diffusion of environmental management system and its effect on environmental management practices. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(5), 565-585. doi:10.1108/ijopm-10-2012-0448

25. Vitezic, N. (2010). Corporate sustainability and triple bottom line: Croatian experience. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 3(1), 68. doi:10.1504/ijtgm.2010.030409

26. Yan, W., Chen, C., & Chang, W. (2009). An investigation into sustainable product conceptualization using a design knowledge hierarchy and Hopfield network. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56(4), 1617-1626. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2008.10.01

27. Collins, C. M., Steg, L., & Koning, M. A. (2007). Customers' values, beliefs on sustainable corporate performance, and buying behavior. Psychology and Marketing, 24(6), 555-577. doi:10.1002/mar.20173

28. Stefan, A., & Paul, L. (2008). Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(4), 45-62. doi:10.5465/amp.2008.35590353.

29. Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships fromcannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37-51. doi:10.1002/tqem.3310080106

30. Frame, B., & Newton, B. (2007). Promoting sustainability through social marketing: Examples from New Zealand. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(6), 571-581. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00600.x

31. Harmon, J., Bucy, F., Nickbarg, S., Rao, G., & Wirtenberg, J. (n.d.). Developing a sustainability strategy. The Sustainable Enterprise Fieldbook, 89-116. doi:10.5848/amacom.978-0-814412-79-4_5

32. Jennifer Ho, L., & Taylor, M. E. (2007). An empirical analysis of triple bottom-line reporting and its determinants: Evidence from the United States and Japan. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 18(2), 123-150. doi:10.1111/j.1467-646x.2007.01010.x

33. Santos, M. A., & Filho, W. L. (2005). An analysis of the relationship between sustainable development and the anthroposystem concept. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 4(1), 78. doi:10.1504/ijesd.2005.006775

34. Spangenberg, J. H. (2005). Economic sustainability of the economy: Concepts and indicators. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1/2), 47. doi:10.1504/ijsd.2005.007374.

35. Shrivastava, P. (1992). Bhopal: Anatomy of a crisis. Sage Publications.

Downloads

Published

31.08.2020

How to Cite

Bilal Khilji, A., Haider Cheema, N., Noreen, F., & Faheem, A. (2020). Triple bottom line as a tool for Organizational Job commitment of Employees: Mediating role of Self Esteem. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(6), 18011-18023. https://doi.org/10.61841/zz2nwq77