Preventing Fraudulent Use of Funds Management Operational Support Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/dbdwa713Keywords:
public participation, proactive supervision, transparency, accountability, education fundingAbstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of public participation, proactive supervision, transparency and accountability on the prevention of fraudulent management of school operational funds. The location of the study was conducted in Buleleng Regency, Bali-Indonesia Province with a population of 663 schools in all districts in Buleleng Regency. Data collection techniques with survey methods using a questionnaire. The intended respondents were school leaders throughout the district. Data analysis was performed with multiple linear regression, which resulted that public participation, proactive supervision, transparency and accountability had a positive and significant effect on preventing fraud in the management of school operational assistance funds. The results state that the higher the level of public participation, supervision, transparency and accountability, the better the prevention of fraud.
Downloads
References
B. J. Lough, “The perpetual education fund: Providing higher education loans in the voluntary sector,” Int. J. Educ. Dev., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 345–350, 2010.
[2] T. D. Maria and V. Bleotu, “Modern Trends in Higher Education Funding,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 116, pp. 2226–2230, 2014.
[3] E. Herbaut and K. Geven, “What works to reduce inequalities in higher education? A systematic review of the (quasi-)experimental literature on outreach and financial aid,” Res. Soc. Stratif. Mobil., no. November, p. 100442, 2019.
[4] C. Liu et al., “Early commitment on financial aid and college decision making of poor students: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in rural China,” Econ. Educ. Rev., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 627–640, 2011.
[5] J. M. Viaene and I. Zilcha, “Public funding of higher education,” J. Public Econ., vol. 108, pp. 78–89, 2013.
[6] M. Adib-Hajbaghery and Z. Kamrava, “Iranian teachers’ knowledge about first aid in the school environment,” Chinese J. Traumatol. - English Ed., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 240–245, 2019.
[7] S. G. Nagy, G. Kováts, and A. O. Németh, “Governance and Funding of Higher Education – International Trends and Best Practices,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 116, pp. 180–184, 2014.
[8] N. Duerrenberger and S. Warning, “Corruption and education in developing countries: The role of public vs. private funding of higher education,” Int. J. Educ. Dev., vol. 62, no. September 2017, pp. 217–225, 2018.
[9] L. Li, X. H. Xia, B. Chen, and L. Sun, “Public participation in achieving sustainable development goals in China: Evidence from the practice of air pollution control,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 201, pp. 499–506, 2018.
[10] J. Meer and H. S. Rosen, “Does generosity beget generosity? Alumni giving and undergraduate financial aid,” Econ. Educ. Rev., vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 890–907, 2012.
[11] S. Rahayu, U. Ludigdo, G. Irianto, and Nurkholis, “Budgeting of School Operational Assistance Fund Based on The Value of Gotong Royong,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 211, no. September, pp. 364–369, 2015.
[12] M. Kim, “Early decision and financial aid competition among need-blind colleges and universities,” J. Public Econ., vol. 94, no. 5–6, pp. 410–420, 2010.
[13] J. Scott-Clayton and B. Zafar, “Financial aid, debt management, and socioeconomic outcomes: Post-college effects of merit-based aid,” J. Public Econ., vol. 170, pp. 68–82, 2019.
[14] A. T. Atmadja, K. A. K. Saputra, and D. T. H. Manurung, “Proactive Fraud Audit , Whistleblowing and Cultural Implementation of Tri Hita Karana for Fraud Prevention,” Eur. Res. Stud. J., vol. XXII, no. 3, pp. 201–214, 2019.
[15] M. C. J. Caniëls, “Proactivity and supervisor support in creative process engagement,” Eur. Manag. J., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 188–197, 2019.
[16] K. Strauss, S. K. Parker, and D. O’Shea, “When does proactivity have a cost? Motivation at work moderates the effects of proactive work behavior on employee job strain,” J. Vocat. Behav., vol. 100, pp. 15–26, 2017.
[17] A. T. Atmadja and K. A. K. Saputra, “Determinant Factors Influencing The Accountability Of Village Financial Management,” Acad. Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2018.
[18] M. Xu, X. Qin, S. B. Dust, and M. S. DiRenzo, “Supervisor-subordinate proactive personality congruence and psychological safety: A signaling theory approach to employee voice behavior,” Leadersh. Q., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 440–453, 2019.
[19] K. M. Eisenhardt, “Agency- and Institutional-Theory Explanations: The Case of Retail Sales Compensation,”
Acad. Manag. J., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 488–511, 1988.
[20] S. Ross, “The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal’s Problem,” Am. Econ. Assoc., vol. 63, no. 2, 1973.
[21] M. Bouckova, “Management Accounting and Agency Theory,” Procedia Econ. Financ., vol. 25, no. 15, pp. 5–13, 2015.
[22] Y. Tang, “When does competition mitigate agency problems?,” J. Corp. Financ., vol. 51, no. 2017, pp. 258– 274, 2018.
[23] Q. T. Tran, “Corruption, agency costs and dividend policy: International evidence,” Q. Rev. Econ. Financ., 2019.
[24] J. Berzins, Ø. Bøhren, and B. Stacescu, “Dividends and taxes: The moderating role of agency conflicts,” J. Corp. Financ., vol. 58, no. January 2018, pp. 583–604, 2019.
[25] M. W. Dirsmith, J. B. Heian, and M. A. Covaleski, “Structure and agency in an institutionalized setting: The application and social transformation of control in the big six,” Accounting, Organ. Soc., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–27, 1997.
[26] M. Jensen, “American Economic Association Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers,” Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 323–329, 1986.
[27] E. F. Fama and M. C. Jensen, “Separation of ownership and control,” Value Creat. Board Corp. Gov. Organ. Behav., vol. XXVI, no. June, pp. 90–111, 2008.
[28] M. Yolles, “The complexity continuum, part 2: modelling harmony,” Kybernetes, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 1626– 1652, 2019.
[29] J. Fu and Y. Geng, “Public participation, regulatory compliance and green development in China based on provincial panel data,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 230, pp. 1344–1353, 2019.
[30] C. Milanés Batista, J. A. Planas, R. Pelot, and J. R. Núñez, “A new methodology incorporating public participation within Cuba’s ICZM program,” Ocean Coast. Manag., vol. 186, no. January, 2020.
[31] M. Stojanovska, M. Miovska, J. Jovanovska, and V. Stojanovski, “The process of forest management plans preparation in the Republic of Macedonia: Does it comprise governance principles of participation, transparency and accountability?,” For. Policy Econ., vol. 49, pp. 51–56, 2014.
[32] T. Johnson, “Public participation in China’s EIA process and the regulation of environmental disputes,”
Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., vol. 81, no. January, p. 106359, 2020.
[33] S. Zhang, “Public participation in the Geoweb era: Defining a typology for geo-participation in local governments,” Cities, vol. 85, no. November 2018, pp. 38–50, 2019.
[34] X. Zhang, J. gang Xu, and Y. Ju, “Public participation in NIMBY risk mitigation: A discourse zoning approach in the Chinese context,” Land use policy, vol. 77, no. July 2016, pp. 559–575, 2018.
[35] Z. Tu, T. Hu, and R. Shen, “Evaluating public participation impact on environmental protection and ecological efficiency in China: Evidence from PITI disclosure,” China Econ. Rev., vol. 55, no. March, pp. 111–123, 2019.
[36] R. Das, B. Laishram, and M. Jawed, “Public participation in urban water supply projects – The case of South-West Guwahati, India,” Water Res., vol. 165, p. 114989, 2019.
[37] L. López and G. Fontaine, “How transparency improves public accountability: The extractive industries transparency initiative in Mexico,” Extr. Ind. Soc., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1156–1167, 2019.
[38] X. S. Lin, Z. X. Chen, S. J. Ashford, C. Lee, and J. Qian, “A self-consistency motivation analysis of employee reactions to job insecurity: The roles of organization-based self-esteem and proactive personality,”
J. Bus. Res., vol. 92, no. October 2017, pp. 168–178, 2018.
[39] E. Chatzivgeri, L. Chew, L. Crawford, M. Gordon, and J. Haslam, “Transparency and accountability for the global good? The UK’s implementation of EU law requiring country-by-country reporting of payments to governments by extractives,” Crit. Perspect. Account., no. xxxx, 2019.
[40] L. Devaney, “Good governance ? Perceptions of accountability , transparency and effectiveness in Irish food risk governance,” Food Policy, vol. 62, pp. 1–10, 2016.
[41] T. M. Harrison and D. S. Sayogo, “Transparency, participation, and accountability practices in open government: A comparative study,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 513–525, 2014.
[42] R. P. Lourenço, “An analysis of open government portals: A perspective of transparency for accountability,”
Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 323–332, 2015.
[43] L. F. Ackert, B. K. Church, S. Venkataraman, and P. Zhang, “The joint impact of accountability and transparency on managers’ reporting choices and owners’ reaction to those choices,” J. Account. Public Policy, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 130–145, 2019.
[44] A. T. Atmadja, K. A. K. Saputra, and M. K. Koswara, “The Influence Of Village Conflict, Village Apparatus Ability, Village Facilitator Competency And Commitment Of Local Government On The Success Of Budget Management,” Acad. Account. Financ. Stud. J., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2018.
[45] K. A. K. Saputra, B. Subroto, A. F. Rahman, and E. Saraswati, “Issues of morality and whistleblowing in short prevention accounting,” Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 77–88, 2020.
[46] G. Zhang, N. Deng, H. Mou, Z. G. Zhang, and X. Chen, “The impact of the policy and behavior of public participation on environmental governance performance: Empirical analysis based on provincial panel data in China,” Energy Policy, vol. 129, no. December 2018, pp. 1347–1354, 2019.
[47] H. Da Wang, C. H. Lin, and C. C. Cho, “The dark and bright sides of agency problems: Evidence from insider compensation of family pyramidal firms,” Asia Pacific Manag. Rev., 2018.
[48] P. Loyalka, Y. Song, J. Wei, W. Zhong, and S. Rozelle, “Information, college decisions and financial aid: Evidence from a cluster-randomized controlled trial in China,” Econ. Educ. Rev., vol. 36, pp. 26–40, 2013.
[49] E. Sujana, K. A. K. Saputra, and D. T. H. Manurung, “Internal control systems and good village governance to achieve quality village financial reports,” Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang., vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 98–108, 2020.
[50] A. T. Atmadja and K. A. K. Saputra, “Pencegahan Fraud Dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa,” J. Ilm. Akunt. dan Bisnis, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 7–16, 2017.
[51] A. Williams, “A global index of information transparency and accountability,” J. Comp. Econ., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 804–824, 2015.
[52] P. Yang, “Who gets more financial aid in China? A multilevel analysis,” Int. J. Educ. Dev., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 560–569, 2010.
[53] M. R. Aczel, K. E. Makuch, and M. Chibane, “How much is enough? Approaches to public participation in shale gas regulation across England, France, and Algeria,” Extr. Ind. Soc., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 427–440, 2018.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
