INSTITUTION MODEL ON MANAGEMENT OF REGIONAL WASTE PROCESSING SITE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/dgt5e011Keywords:
Final Waste Processing Site, SWOT Analysis, Regional Technical Implementation UniT, Regional Public Service Board.Abstract
The main problem of waste management in urban areas is the limited land available for the location of the Final Waste Processing Site (TPAS). To overcome this problem, the city government cooperated with the district government in handling the final processing of waste together (TPAS Regional) with TPAS locations in the district area. This condition occurs in the cities of Yogyakarta and Denpasar, which have collaborated in the management of Regional TPAS with surrounding districts. Yogyakarta City Government cooperates with Sleman Regency and Bantul Regency, known as TPAM Regional Kartamantul. While the Denpasar City Government collaborated with Bandung Regency, Gianyar Regency, and Tabanan Regency, known as TPAS Regional Sarbagita. In the implementation of the Regional TPAS, it is less effective due to among others: institutional structures that are too large, lack of coordination between institutions, overlapping of leading tasks, and institutional functions between districts if problems occur. This study aims to choose the right institutional model for regional TPAS management so that it can develop and be independent. This research uses exploratory methods and discussed using SWOT analysis. The SWOT analysis results show that the Regional Technical Implementation Unit (UPTD) of Province is superior to the District UPTD. The existence of UPTD institutions under the Provincial Government as the manager of the Regional TPAS facilitates supervision and control in the field. Districts/cities involved in cooperation can send waste to the TPAS location, with only a tipping fee charged according to the volume of waste sent. Whereas the transportation of debris from the waste source to the TPAS location remains the responsibility of each district/city. This research conducted in two areas, TPAM Regional Kartamantul and TPAS Regional Sarbagita. The most appropriate institution to manage Regional TPAS to be able to develop and be independent is the Provincial UPTD by applying the Financial Management Pattern of the Regional Public Service Board (PPK-BLUD).
Downloads
References
1. Anggraini, F. (2011). Aspek Kelembagaan pada Pengelolaan Tempat Pemrosesan Akhir Sampah Regional. Jurnal Permukiman, 6(2), 78–84.Government Regulation No. 41/2007 concerning the Organizational Structure of Regional Offices.
2. Government Regulation Number 14 of 1987 concerning Submission of Partial Government Affairs in the Field of Public Works to the Regions.
3. Government Regulation Number 23 of 2005 concerning Financial Management of Public Service Agencies, Jo. Government Regulation Number 74 of 2012 regarding Amendments to Government Regulation Number 23 of 2005 regarding Financial Management of Public Service Bodies.
4. Government Regulation Number 81 Year 2012 concerning Management of Household Waste and Similar Household Waste.
5. Law Number 33 of 2004 concerning Financial Balance between the Central Government and Regional Governments.
6. Minister of Home Affairs Regulation No. 33 of 2010 concerning guidelines for Waste Management.
7. Minister of Home Affairs Regulation No. 61 of 2007 concerning Technical Guidelines for Financial Management of Regional Public Service Agencies.
8. Nugroho, Panji, 2013. Panduan Membuat Kompos Cair. Jakarta: Pustaka Baru Press.
9. Rangkuti, Freddy. 2001. Analisis SWOT Teknik Membedah Kasus Bisnis PT.Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta.
10. Regulation of the Minister of Public Works Number 3 of 2013 concerning Management of Household Waste and Household Trash.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
