RELEVANCE ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR OMITTING COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT IN INDONESIA

Authors

  • Chryssantus Kastowo Faculty of Law, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Sleman Regency Author
  • Theresia Anita Christianib Faculty of Law, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Sleman Regency Author
  • Anny Retnowati Law Graduate Programme, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Sleman Regency Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/xf91zc30

Keywords:

economic right, infringement, law enforcement, omission

Abstract

Indonesia is committed to protecting copyright. Indonesia participates in various international conventions in the field of intellectual property and amends copyright laws. Indonesia changed the nature of the ordinary offense to complaint offense as a form of recognition that copyright is a personal right. This change in the offense should change the paradigm of copyright as private property. This article will discuss how this paradigm shift in copyright has implications for the enforcement of copyright law in Indonesia. This article base on normative legal research focusing on secondary data. The analysis in this study uses a conceptual approach. The results showed that copyright regulation as individual rights. The right owner is personally responsible for the copyrights he owns. Until now, copyright violations are still widespread in society. Copyright infringement does not always have the economic motivation, so it does not always result in losses for the creator—the results in violations of rights, which does not always lead to disputes. The absence of a dispute does not mean there is no copyright infringement. Based on economic considerations, the creator allowed the budgeting to occur, and without a law enforcement process. Copyright rules as an expression of appreciation from the state for creative subjects are meaningless if there is the elimination of violations. The creator should support all efforts to protect copyright, mainly if copyright infringement occurs.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Antariksa, B. (2020, Januari 15). http://kemenpar.go.id/asset_admin/assets/uploads/media/old_all/Art_19Landasan%20Filosofis%20H KI.pdf. Retrieved from Kemeterian Pariwisata dan Ekonomi Kreatif: http://www.kemenparekraf.go.id/

2. Ashok, A. (2009). Economic Rights of Authors under Copyright Law: Some Emerging. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 46-54.

3. Budi, H. S. (2011). HAK CIPTA TANPA HAK MORAL. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

4. Campbell, H. (1997). Blac’s Law Dictionary. St. Paul Minn : West Publishing Co.

5. Hadjon, P. M. (2007). Perlindungan Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bina Ilmu.

6. Halim, P. P. (1996). Hak Milik Keadilan dan Kemakmuran Tinjauan Falsafah Hukum. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

7. https://dgip.go.id/images/humas/Images/Media-HKI-vol-5.pdf. (2020, Januari 5). Retrieved from Direktoral Jenderal Kekayaan Inteletual: https://dgip.go.id

8. https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/reports-and-publications/2020. (2020, January 6). Retrieved from United States Trade Representative: https://ustr.gov

9. Jened, R. (2014). Hukum Hak Cipta. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

10. Mahmud, P. (2017). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

11. Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

12. Mertokusumo, S. (2018). Mengenal Hukum. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma.

13. Saidin, H. O. (2013). Aspek Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo.

14. Sardjono, A. (2010). Hak Cipta Bukan Hanya Copyright. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, Universitas Indonesia., 252-269.

15. Sofwan, S. S. (2000). Hukum Perdata: Hukum Benda. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

16. Sumaryono. (2003). Etika Hukum Relevansi Teori Hukum Kodrat Thomas Aquinas. Yogyakarta: Kanisius

Downloads

Published

30.06.2020

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 6 (2020): 24 (6) 2020

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

How to Cite

Kastowo, C., Christianib, T. A., & Retnowati, A. (2020). RELEVANCE ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR OMITTING COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT IN INDONESIA. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(6), 10383-10392. https://doi.org/10.61841/xf91zc30