A REVIEW ON BELIEF IN MAGIC AND THE SUPERNATURAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/y1t39993Keywords:
supernatural reasoning, mystical convictions, psychological working, Social correspondenceAbstract
They typically spread overview on supernatural viewpoint in existing contemporary cultures conflicts that captivated convictions are a lot of analytical marvels that proceed today as a meaningless development to a considerably different substantial arrangement of customary convictions. Against this view, the study proposed in this research, which motivates that the beliefs in sorcery are an essential quality of the individual brain. People can purposely think of themselves as a sensible populace and decline to trust supernatural power, even withholding a subliminal faith in the divine. Exploration demonstrates how dedication to spiritual thinking can increase intellectual working, like imaginative reasoning, discernment, and memory. Furthermore, this research proposes that specific social consistency and acceptance to power genuinely progressed from mystical acts of brain control are sustained through the recognized faith in the supernatural. At last, the research representations everyday issues, like direction, religion, political effect, profession, army, and political concern, and diversion, in which transcendent thinking, and convictions of existing day citizens, can find practical applications.
Downloads
References
Atkin, C. (1983). Effects of realistic TV violence vs. fictional violence on aggression. Journalism Quarterly, 60, 615–621.
Bolton, D., Dearsley, P., Madronal-Luque, R., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2002). Magical thinking in childhood and adolescence: Development and relation to obsessive compulsion. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 479–494.
Boyer, P., & Walker, S. (2000). Intuitive ontology and cultural input in the acquisition of religious concepts. In Rosengren, K. S., Johnson, C. N., & Harris, P. L. (Eds.).
Boyer, P. (1994). The naturalness of religious ideas: A cognitive theory of religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bushman, B. J., & Huesmann, L. R. (2001). Effects of televised violence on aggression. In Singer, D. G., & Singer, J. L. (Eds.), Handbook of Children and the Media (pp. 223–254). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Comstock, G., & Scharrer, E. (2006). Media and pop culture. In Damon, W., Lerner, R. M. (Eds.-in-Chief), Renninger, K. A., & Sigel, I. (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology (6th ed., Vol. 4, pp. 817–863). New York, NY: Wiley.
Einstein, D. A., & Menzies, R. G. (2004). Role of magical thinking in obsessive-compulsive symptoms in an undergraduate sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 215–225.
Eisenberger, R., Haskins, F., & Gambleton, P. (1999). Promised reward and creativity: Effects of prior experience. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 308–325.
Frasier, J. (1993, April 14–18). Magic in a classroom: Using conjuring to teach selectivity and general semantics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Central States Communication Association, Lexington, KY.
Frazer, J. G. (1959). The golden bough: A study in magic and religion. New York, NY: Macmillan. (Original work published 1890).
George, L., & Neufeld, R. W. (1987). Magical ideation and schizophrenia. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 778–779.
Harari, Y. N. (2015). Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. London: Vintage.
Hawkins, J., Pea, R. D., Glick, J., & Scribner, S. (1984). Merds that laugh don’t like mushrooms: Evidence for deductive reasoning by preschoolers. Developmental Psychology, 20, 584–594.
Hudson, M. (2012). The 7 laws of magical thinking: How irrational beliefs keep us happy, healthy, and sane. New York, NY: Penguin.
Leevers, H. J., & Harris, P. L. (1999). Persisting effects of instruction on young children’s syllogistic reasoning with incongruent and abstract premises. Thinking & Reasoning, 5, 145–173.
Lévy-Brühl, L. (1966). Primitive mentality. Boston, MA: Beacon Press. (Original work published 1923).
Lillard, A. S. (1996). Body or mind: Children's categorizing of pretense. Child Development, 67, 1717–1734.
Lillard, A. S., & Sobel, D. (1999). Lion kings or puppies: The influence of fantasy on children's understanding of pretense. Developmental Science, 2, 75–80.
Lindeman, M., & Aarnio, K. (2007). Superstitious, magical, and paranormal beliefs: An integrative model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 731–744.
Luhrman, T. M. (1989). Persuasions of the witch’s craft: Ritual magic and witchcraft in present-day England. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Mauss, M. (1972). A general theory of magic (B. Brain, Trans.). New York, NY: Norton Library. (Original work published 1903).
Morillo, C., Belloch, A., & Garcia-Soriano, G. (2007). Clinical obsessions in obsessive-compulsive patients and obsession-relevant intrusive thoughts in non-clinical, depressed, and anxious subjects: Where are the differences? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 1319–1333.
Nemeroff, C., & Rozin, P. (2000). The making of the magical mind: The nature and function of sympathetic magical thinking. In Rosengren, K. S., & Johnson, C. N. (Eds.).
Noyes, R., & Hoehn-Saric, R. (2006). The anxiety disorders. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Piaget, J. (1971). The child’s conception of the world. London, England: Routledge. (Original work published 1929).
Principe, G. F., & Smith, E. (2008). Seeing things unseen: Fantasy beliefs and false reports. Journal of Cognition and Development, 9, 89–111.
Pronin, E., Rodriguez, S., Wegner, D. M., & McCarthy, K. (2006). Everyday magical powers: The role of apparent mental causation in the overestimation of personal influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 218–231.
Rachman, S. (2006). The fear of contamination: Assessment and treatment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Richards, C. A., & Sanderson, J. A. (1999). The role of imagination in facilitating deductive reasoning in 2-, 3-, and 4-year-olds. Cognition, 72, B1–B9.
Shafran, R., Thordarson, M. A., & Rachman, S. (1996). Thought-action fusion in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 10, 379–391.
Simonds, L. M., Demetre, J. D., & Read, C. (2009). Relationships between magical thinking, obsessive-compulsiveness, and other forms of anxiety in a sample of non-clinical children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 457–471.
Sobel, D. M., & Lillard, A. S. (2001). The impact of fantasy and action on young children’s understanding of pretence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 85–98.
Subbotsky, E., & Matthews, J. (2011). Magical thinking and memory: Distinctiveness effect in TV advertisements with magical content. Psychological Reports, 109, 1–11.
Subbotsky, E. (2010a). Magic and the mind: Mechanisms, functions, and development of magical thinking and behavior. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Subbotsky, E., Hysted, C., & Jones, N. (2010). Watching films with magical content facilitates creativity in children. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 111, 261–277.
Tambiah, S. J. (1990). Magic, science, religion, and the scope of rationality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, E. B. (1929). Primitive culture (Vol. 1, Rpt.). London, England: J. Murray.
Tissot, R., & Burnard, Y. (1980). Aspects of cognitive activity in schizophrenia. Psychological Medicine, 10, 657–663.
Wiseman, R., & Watt, C. (2004). Measuring superstitious beliefs: Why lucky charms matter. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1533–1541.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
