AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON APPLICATION AND SIGNIFICANCE OF DNA FORENSICS

Authors

  • Laxmi Kirana Pallathadka Manipur International University, Imphal, Manipur, India Author
  • Harikumar Pallathadka Manipur International University, Imphal, Manipur, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/h9q9qf91

Keywords:

DNA, FINGERPRINTING, FORENSIC, CRIMINAL ASPECTS

Abstract

Every person on the planet can be identified at an atomic level thanks to a significant level of polymorphism in their DNA development. The person obtains from their organic guardians and is indistinguishable in every body cell. DNA fingerprinting, as this arrangement of explicit confirmation is called, can assert the parentage of an individual with sureness. DNA profiling in the criminal value system is an indispensable issue for criminal experts today. The advancement is changing rapidly, and a couple of new methods are becoming unmistakably open. DNA profiling has been portrayed as a viable accomplishment in criminological science.DNA is available in the vast majority of the cells in our body, which is one of a kind in every individual, and we leave a path of it wherever we go. It has become advantageous for measurable agents who use DNA to determine the ID of casualties who have also been blamed in wrongdoing scenes. The tremendous eventuality of DNA invention as an ID device has resulted in a massive shift in felonious justice and is a common misunderstanding. The DNA information base is a data resource for the criminological DNA jotting community that contains information on generally used short couple reappraisal (STR) DNA labels. DNA profiling is a progressive method that works dependent on the standard of polymorphism in DNA succession and distinguishes people by their one-of-a-kind hereditary cosmetic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Amankwaa, A. O. (2018). Forensic DNA retention: Public perspective studies in the United Kingdom and around the world. Science & Justice, 58(6), 455–464.

2. Amankwaa, A. O., & McCartney, C. (2019). The effectiveness of the UK national DNA database. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 1, 45–55.

3. Arnaud, C. H. (2017). Thirty years of DNA forensics: How DNA has revolutionized criminal investigations. Chemical & Engineering News, 95(37), 16–20.

4. De Moor, S., Vandeviver, C., & Vander Beken, T. (2018). Integrating police-recorded crime data and DNA data to study serial co-offending behaviour. European Journal of Criminology, 15(5), 632–651.

5. Di Resta, C., Galbiati, S., Carrera, P., & Ferrari, M. (2018). Next-generation sequencing approach for diagnosing human diseases: Open challenges and new opportunities. EJIFCC, 29(1), 4–14.

6. Diegoli, T. M., Linacre, A., & Coble, M. D. (2014). Population genetic data for 15 X chromosomal short tandem repeat markers in three US populations. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 8(1), 64–67.

7. Doleac, J. L. (2017). The effects of DNA databases on crime. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9(1), 165–201.

8. Garrido-Ramos, M. A. (2017). Satellite DNA: An evolving topic. Genes (Basel), 8(9), 230.

9. Hu, N., Cong, B., Li, S., Ma, C., Fu, L., & Zhang, X. (2014). Current developments in the forensic interpretation of mixed DNA samples (Review). Biomedical Reports, 2(3), 309–316.

10. Katsanis, S. H., & Katsanis, N. (2013). Molecular genetic testing and the future of clinical genomics. Nature Reviews Genetics, 14(6), 415–426.

11. Kayser, M. (2015). Forensic DNA phenotyping: Predicting human appearance from crime scene material for investigative purposes. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 18, 33–48.

12. Khare, P., Raj, V., Chandra, S., & Agarwal, S. (2014). Quantitative and qualitative assessment of DNA extracted from saliva for its use in forensic identification. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 6(2), 81–85.

13. Linacre, A., & Templeton, J. (2014). Forensic DNA profiling: State of the art. Research and Reports in Forensic Medical Science, 5, 25–33.

14. Ludwig, A. (2016). E ‘value’ ating forensic science. Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal, 7(3–4), 69–80.

15. Machado, H., & Silva, S. (2019). What influences public views on forensic DNA testing in the criminal field? A scoping review of quantitative evidence. Human Genomics, 13(1), 23.

16. Moumita, S., Mitashree, M., Rao, A., & Isukapatla. (2017). DNA fingerprinting applications in forensic investigations. International Journal of Current Research, 9(1), 45542–45546.

17. Murphy, E. (2017). Forensic DNA typing. Annual Review of Criminology, 1, 497–515.

18. Pallathadka, H. (2020). An examination of the use of DNA technology in paternity disputes. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(6), 3163–3172.

19. Salceda, S., Barican, A., Buscaino, J., Goldman, B., Klevenberg, J., Kuhn, M., ... & King, D. (2017). Validation of a rapid DNA process with the RapidHIT® ID system using GlobalFiler® Express chemistry. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 28, 21–34.

20. Shetty, P. J. (2020). The evolution of DNA extraction methods. American Journal of Biomedical Science Research, 8(1), 39–45.

21. Shi, R., & Panther, D. R. (2017). A novel plant DNA extraction method using filter paper-based 96-well spin plate. Planta, 246(3), 579–584.

22. Struyf, P., De Moor, S., Vandeviver, C., Renard, B., & Vander Beken, T. (2019). The effectiveness of DNA databases in relation to their purpose and content: A systematic review. Forensic Science International, 301, 371–381.

23. Szkuta, B., Ansell, R., Boiso, L., Connolly, E., Kloosterman, A. D., Kokshoorn, B., ... & van Oorschot, R. A. H. (2019). Assessment of the transfer, persistence, prevalence, and recovery of DNA traces from clothing: An inter-laboratory study on worn upper garments. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 42, 56–68.

24. Toom, V., Granja, R., & Ludwig, A. (2019). The Prüm decisions as an aspirational regime: Reviewing a decade of cross-border exchange and comparison of forensic DNA data. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 41, 50–57.

25. Turina, S., Ferrian, M., Caratti, S., & De Leo, D. (2014). Evaluation of genetic parameters of 22 autosomal STR loci (PowerPlex® Fusion System) in a population sample from Northern Italy. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 128(2), 281–283.

26. Vitošević, K., Todorović, D., Slović, Z., Živković-Zarić, R., & Todorović, M. (2019). Forensic genetics and genotyping. Serbian Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research, 20(2), 75–86.

Downloads

Published

19.11.2020

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 10 (2020): 24 (10) 2020

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

How to Cite

Pallathadka, L. K., & Pallathadka, H. (2020). AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON APPLICATION AND SIGNIFICANCE OF DNA FORENSICS. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(10), 7962-7976. https://doi.org/10.61841/h9q9qf91