THE IMPACT TEACHER PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM IN INDONESIA ON SCIENCE TEACHERS’ KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND CRITIQUE

Authors

  • Yohanes Freadyanus Kasi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia and STKIP Nusa Bunga Floresta, NTT, Indonesia Author
  • Achmad Samsudin Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia Author
  • Ari Widodo Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia Author
  • Riandi Riandi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia Author
  • Muhammad Nurtanto Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Banten, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/b6vj8352

Keywords:

Teacher Professional Development, science teacher, Indonesia

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to provide a review of empirical studies investigating the impact of teacher professional development (TPD) program in Indonesia on science teachers’ knowledge and practices. Across 11 articles that satisfied the definition we embraced, most were devoted to the improve the content knowledge (CoK/CK), general pedagogical knowledge (GPK), pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), and science teaching practices. Although a small number of studies have an implicit focus on variable affective, we set out to examine the studies in science education. Analysis of the related studies resulted in the following the TPD program in Indonesia can help teachers improving their CoK/CK, GPK, PCK, and may facilitate the change in teacher practices, science teachers' activities focusing on student learning in TPD program are more likely to change their practice. However, based on the analysis the TPD program in Indonesia still lacks using a partnership approach, technology, and ethnoscience. The recommendation for further research is still needed to more fully justify the expansion of the TPD program in Indonesia for science teachers using a partnership approach, technology, and ethnoscience to increase knowledge of the TPD program and their role to improve science teaching and learning in class.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. M. L. L. Gaikhorst, L., Beishuizen, J.J., Zijlstra, B.J.H. & Volman, ‘Contribution of a professional development programme to the quality and retention of teachers in an urban environment’, Eur. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 41–57, 2015.

2. T. Lee, H., Longhurst, M. & Campbell, ‘Teacher learning in technology professional development and its impact on student achievement in science’, Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 0693, no. June, 2017, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2017.1327733.

3. B. J. Förtsch, C., Werner, S., Kotzebue, L. V. & Neuhaus, ‘Effects of biology teachers ’ professional knowledge and cognitive activation on students ’ achievement cognitive activation on students ’ achievement’, Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–25, 2016.

4. Z. Trabona, K., Taylor, M., Klein, E. J., Munakata, M. & Rahman, ‘Professional Development in Education Collaborative professional learning : cultivating science teacher leaders through vertical communities of practice leaders through vertical communities of practice’, Prof. Dev. Educ., vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–16, 2019.

5. V. L. Ufnar, J.A., & Shepherd, ‘The Scientist in the Classroom Partnership program: an innovative teacher professional development model’, Prof. Dev. Educ., vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 642–658, 2018.

6. W. Jin, X., Li, T., Meirink, J., Van des Want, A. & Admiraal, ‘Learning from novice–expert interaction in teachers’ continuing professional development’, Prof. Dev. Educ., pp. 1–18, 2019.

7. D. Geeraerts, K., Tynjälä, P., Heikkinen, H. L. T., Markkanen, I., Pennanen, M. & Gijbels, ‘European Journal of Teacher Education Peer-group mentoring as a tool for teacher development’, Eur. J. Teach. Educ., pp. 37–41, 2015.

8. M. Nurtanto, P. Pardjono, Widarto -, and S. D. Ramdani̇, ‘The Effect of STEM-EDP in Professional Learning on Automotive Engineering Competence in Vocational High School’, J. Educ. Gift. Young Sci., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 633–656, Jun. 2020, Accessed: Mar. 18, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jegys/645047.

9. H. Snoek, M., Knezic, D., Van Den Berg, E., Emmelot, Y., Heyma, A. & Sligte, Sligte, ‘Impact of in-service Master of Education programmes on teachers and their working environment’, Eur. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 620–637, 2018.

10. L. Lund, ‘Improving Schools When school-based , in-service teacher training sharpens pedagogical awareness’, Improv. Sch., pp. 1–15, 2018.

11. S. Kilpatrick, S. & Fraser, ‘Using the STEM framework collegially for mentoring , peer learning and planning learning and planning’, Prof. Dev. Educ., vol. 5257, pp. 1–13, 2018.

12. B. F. Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S. & Birman, ‘Effects of Professional Development on Teachers ’ Instruction : Results from a Three-year Longitudinal Study’, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 81–112, 2015.

13. J. Correia, C., Dinis, L.T., Pinheiro, R., Fraga, H., Ferreira, H., Goncalves, I., Costa, J., Oliveira, A., Malheiro, A. & Mountinho-Pereira, ‘Climate change and adaptation strategies for human health’, J. Int. Sci. Publ. Agric. Food Vol., vol. 2, no. June, pp. 1314–8591, 2014.

14. O. Avidov-ungar, O. & Herscu, ‘Professional Development in Education Formal professional development as perceived by teachers in different professional life periods’, Prof. Dev. Educ., vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–12, 2019.

15. T. Swennen, A. & Bates, ‘The professional development of teacher educators’, Prof. Dev. Educ., vol. 36, pp. 1–7, 2010.

16. C. Shein, P. P. & Tsai, ‘International Journal of Science Impact of a Scientist – Teacher Collaborative Model on Students , Teachers , and Scientists’, Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 37, no. 13, 2015, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1068465.

17. G. Morine-Dershimer and T. Kent, ‘The Complex Nature and Sources of Teachers’ Pedagogical Knowledge’, Examining Pedagog. Content Knowl., pp. 21–50, 1999.

18. L. Shulman, ‘Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform’, Harv. Educ. Rev., vol. 57, no. 1,

pp. 1–23, 1987.

19. A. Rahman, B., Abdurrahman and N. E. Kadaryanto, B. & Rusminto, ‘Teacher-based scaffolding as a teacher professional development program in Indonesia’, Aust. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 66–78, 2015.

20. Y. Rochintaniawati, D., Riandi, R., Kestianty, J., Kindy, N. & Rukayadi, ‘The analysis of biology teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge development in lesson study in West Java Indonesia’, J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 201–210, 2019.

21. H. J. Anif, S., Sutopo, A. & Prayitno, ‘Lesson Study Validation : Model for Social and Natural Sciences Teacher Development in the Implementation of National Curriculum in Muhammadiyah Schools , Indonesia’, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 253–259, 2020.

22. I. N. Purwoko, A. A., Andayani, Y., Muntar, M. & Diartha, ‘Efforts in improving teachers’ competencies through collaboration between teacher forum on subject matter (MGMP) and pre-service teacher training institution (LPTK)’, J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 11–15, 2017.

23. F. Misnasanti., Dien, C. A. & Azizah, ‘The roles of lesson study in the development of mathematics learning instrument based on learning trajectory’, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 983, no. 1, 2018.

24. C. P. Sari, E. & Lim, ‘Design-based Research: Understanding its application in a teacher professional development study in Indonesia’, Asia-Pac. Educ. Res., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 28–38, 2012.

25. E. R. Sari, ‘Online learning community: A case study of teacher professional development in Indonesia’,

Intercult. Educ., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 63–72, 2012.

26. M. Harjanto, I., Lie, A., Wihardini, D., Pryor, L. & Wilson, ‘Community-based teacher professional development in remote areas in Indonesia’, J. Educ. Teach., vol. 7476, no. December, pp. 1–20, 2017.

27. NRC, National Science Education Standards. 1996.

28. N. B. M. Anif, S., Sutama., Prayitno, H. J. & Idrus, ‘Effectiveness of pedagogical competence: A development model through association of biology teachers’ forum’, J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 22–31, 2019.

29. S. Winarsih, A. & Mulyani, ‘Peningkatan profesionalisme guru IPA melalui lesson study dalam pengembangan model pembelajaran PBI’, J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 2012.

30. M. Nurtanto, H. Sofyan, P. Pardjono, and S. Suyitno, ‘Development model for competency improvement and national vocational qualification support frames in automotive technology’, Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ. IJERE, vol. 9, no. 1, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20447.

31. A. Soko, I. P., Setiawan, A. & Widodo, ‘Development of a Cultural-based Physics Learning Module for Teacher Education and Training Program to Enhance Teacher Pedagogical Content Knowledge’, 4th ICRIEMS Proc. Publ. Fac. Math. Nat. Sci., pp. 29–36, 2015.

32. R. Weitzel, H. & Blank, ‘Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Peer Dialogues between Pre-Service Biology Teachers in the Planning of Science Lessons . Results of an Intervention Study Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Peer Dialogues between Pre-Service Biology Teachers in the Planning’, J. Sci. Teach. Educ., vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–19, 2019.

33. A. Nilsson, P. & Elm, ‘Capturing and Developing Early Childhood Teachers ’ Science Pedagogical Content Knowledge Through CoRes Capturing and Developing Early Childhood Teachers ’ Science’, J. Sci. Teach. Educ., vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–19, 2017.

34. H. Bravo, P. & Cofré, ‘Developing biology teachers ’ pedagogical content knowledge through learning study : the case of teaching human evolution’, Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–28, 2016.

35. N. Coenders, F. Verhoef, ‘Professional Development in Education Lesson Study : professional development ( PD ) for beginning and experienced teachers’, Prof. Dev. Educ., vol. 5257, pp. 1–14, 2018.

36. P. J. Barnett, E. & Friedrichsen, ‘Educative Mentoring : How a Mentor Supported a Preservice Biology Teacher ’ s Pedagogical Content Knowledge Development’, J. Sci. Teach. Educ., vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 647– 668, 2015.

37. D. Sgouros, G. & Stavrou, ‘Teachers’ professional development in Nanoscience and nanotechnology in the context of a Community of Learners’, Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 41, no. 15, pp. 2070–2093, 2019.

38. C. Coenders, F. & Terlouw, ‘A Model for In-service Teacher Learning in the Context of an Innovation’, J. Sci. Teach. Educ., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 451–470, 2015.

39. G. Kadji-beltran, C., Zachariou, A. & Liarakou, ‘Professional Development in Education Mentoring as a strategy for empowering Education for Sustainable Development in schools’, Prof. Dev. Educ., vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 37–41, 2014, doi: 10.1080/19415257.2013.835276.

40. Z. Arifin, M. Nurtanto, W. Warju, R. Rabiman, and N. Kholifah, ‘The TAWOCK Conceptual Model for Content Knowledge for Professional Teaching in Vocational Education’, Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ. IJERE, vol. 9, no. 3, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v9i3.20561.

41. Z. Arifin, M. Nurtanto, M. Fawaid, and R. Rabiman, ‘The TAWOCK Framework: A Professional Innovation Teaching and Learning on Vocational Education’, J. Educ. Learn. EduLearn, vol. 14, no. 3, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v14i3.15946.

42. M. G. Juhler, ‘The Use of Lesson Study Combined with Content Representation in the Planning of Physics Lessons During Field Practice to Develop Pedagogical Content Knowledge’, J. Sci. Teach. Educ., no. 1, 2016.

43. F. E. Terrazas-arellanes, L. A. Strycker, E. D. Walden, L. A. Strycker, E. D. Walden, and E. D. Walden, ‘Web-Based Professional Development Model to Enhance Teaching of Strategies for Online Academic Research in Middle School’, J. Res. Technol. Educ., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–24, 2019, doi: 10.1080/15391523.2018.1564637.

Downloads

Published

30.06.2020

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 6 (2020): 24 (6) 2020

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

How to Cite

Kasi, Y. F., Samsudin, A., Widodo, A., Riandi, R., & Nurtanto, M. (2020). THE IMPACT TEACHER PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM IN INDONESIA ON SCIENCE TEACHERS’ KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND CRITIQUE. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(6), 9916-9929. https://doi.org/10.61841/b6vj8352