ETTING STARTED IN INTERNAL SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: EVALUATION OF INTEGRATION BETWEEN SOCIAL ACCOUNTING AUDIT AND INTERNAL CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: REVIEW OF LITERATURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/8xvdb636Keywords:
-social accounting and audit,, -internal corporate social responsibility, business ethics, social accounting.Abstract
Social accounting and audit and internal corporate social responsibility are similar concepts that share equal value within the sphere of social activities. However, a comprehensive review that portray understanding of academic concept alongside other non-academic event that influence social expectations with respect to employee as an internal stakeholder is missing in the existing studies. The purpose of this paper is to examine social integration that exist between social accounting and audit and internal corporate social responsibility by reviewing the most relevant information that have contributed to their understanding and definitions. It should be noted that the integration of the two concepts continue to be the subject to multiple perceptions. The analysis conducted shed light on the group of issues that emerged with regards to politics, economic and stakeholder’s interests which must be continuously explore in order to respond to social demand of employees with respect to job. Social accounting and audit and internal corporate social responsibility is expected to remain part of organization’s sustainable development. Therefore, there is plausible future for social accounting and audit and internal corporate social responsibility if considerable attention is given to their integrative approach.
Downloads
References
1. Adhikari, A., Biswas, I., & Avittathur, B. (2019). Green retailing: a new paradigm in supply chain management Green Business: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1489-1508): IGI Global.
2. Ahmad, I., Shahzad, K., & Zafar, M. A. (2017). Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Attributions on Workplace Deviance Behaviors. Journal of Managerial Sciences, 11(2).
3. Amira, N., Hanim, & Mazlina. (2018). Benefit and Challenges of CSR Implementation: Evidence from Manufacturing Sector in Malaysia Journal of Engineering and Technology., 2(29), 215 -218.
4. André, Cho, & Laine. (2018). Reference Points for Measuring Social Performance: Case Study of a Social Business Venture. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(5), 660-678.
5. Andreaus, M., Costa, E., & Parker, L. D. (2014). Accountability and social accounting for social and non- profit organizations: Emerald Group Publishing.
6. Bebbington, J., & Unerman, J. (2018). Achieving the United Nations sustainable development goals. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.
7. Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9-19.
8. Brieger, S. A., Anderer, S., Fröhlich, A., Bäro, A., & Meynhardt, T. (2019). Too much of a good thing? On the relationship between CSR and employee work addiction. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-19.
9. Brown, J., & Fraser, M. (2006). Approaches and perspectives in social and environmental accounting: an overview of the conceptual landscape. Business strategy and the Environment, 15(2), 103-117.
10. Camilleri, M. A. (2015). Environmental, social and governance disclosures in Europe. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal.
11. Chia-Chun. (2010). How Corporate Social Responsibility Influences Employee Job Satisfaction in the Hotel Industry University of Nevada. Las Vegas Professional Paper.
12. Crane, A., Matten, D., Glozer, S., & Spence, L. (2019). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization: Oxford University Press, USA.
13. Crowther, D. (2000). Social and Environmental Accounting, London: Financial Times Prentice Hall. Davis, SW and Sherman, WR (1996) The Accounting Change Commission: a Critical Perspective.
14. De Roeck, K., & Maon, F. (2018). Building the theoretical puzzle of employees’ reactions to corporate social responsibility: An integrative conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(3), 609-625.
15. Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2010). Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and divergences. Journal of social entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32-53.
16. Delphine, & Simon, A. (2018). Environmental Management Accounting: The Missing Link to Sustainability? Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 38(1), 1 -18.
17. Dey, C. (2007). Social accounting at Traidcraft plc: A struggle for the meaning of fair trade. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3), 423-445.
18. Dežmar-Krainz, K. (2015). Enhancing wellbeing of employees through corporate social responsibility context. Megatrend revija, 12(2), 137-153.
19. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility, Multi-faceted Job- Products, and Employee Outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(2), 319-335. doi:10.1007/s10551- 014-2286-5
20. Edwards, M., & Fowler, A. (2002). The Earthscan reader on NGO management: Earthscan.
21. El Akremi, A., Gond, J.-P., Swaen, V., De Roeck, K., & Igalens, J. (2015). How do Employees Perceive Corporate Responsibility? Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Corporate Stakeholder Responsibility Scale. J. Manag. doi:10.1177/0149206315569311
22. Europe, S. E. a. t. E. I. (2020). Information about the European Union in all the Official Languages of the EU is Available on the Europa Website At: Http://Europa.Eu. Comparative Synthesis Report 2020
23. Gibassier, D., & Alcouffe, S. (2018a). Environmental management accounting: the missing link to sustainability? : Taylor & Francis.
24. Gibassier, D., & Alcouffe, S. (2018b). Environmental Management Accounting: The Missing Link to Sustainability? . Social and Environmental Accountability Journal., 38(1), 1 - 18.
25. Gibbon, R. J. (2010). Enacting social accounting within a community enterprise: actualising hermeneutic conversation. University of St Andrews.
26. Giles, & Murphy. (2016). The Relationship Between SLAPP Suits and Changed ESG Reporting by Firms. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(1), 44–79.
27. Gond, J.-P., & Herrbach, O. (2006). Social Reporting as an Organisational Learning Tool? A Theoretical Framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 65(4), 359-371. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-6405-9
28. Gray, R. (2001). Thirty years of social accounting, reporting and auditing: what (if anything) have we learnt? Business ethics: A European review, 10(1), 9-15.
29. Gray, R. (2002). The social accounting project and Accounting Organizations and Society Privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique? Accounting, organizations and society, 27(7), 687-708.
30. Gray, R., Brennan, A., & Malpas, J. (2014). New accounts: Towards a reframing of social accounting. Paper presented at the Accounting Forum.
31. Hameed, I., Riaz, Z., Arain, G. A., & Farooq, O. (2016). How do internal and external CSR affect employees' organizational identification? A perspective from the group engagement model. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 788.
32. Im, Chung, & Yang. (2017). Employees Participation in Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Person–CSR Fit. . Sustainability, 9(1), 28.
33. John, P. (1999). Providing Best Value Through the Social Audit:. Liverpool 13.
34. Johnstone, L. (2018). Theorising and modelling social control in environmental management accounting research. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 38(1), 30-48.
35. Kim, H.-R., Woo, E., Uysal, M., & Kwon, N. ( 2018). The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on Employee Well-Being in the Hospitality Industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management., 30(3), 1584-1600.
36. Lee, M. D. P. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 53-73.
37. Mäkelä, H., Gibbon, J., & Costa, E. (2017). Social enterprise, accountability and social accounting. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 37(1), 1-5.
38. O'Dwyer. (2007). NGO Accountability. In Sustainability Accounting and Accountability.Edited By: Unerman, J., Bebbington, J. And O'Dwyer, B. London: Routledge., 285–306. .
39. Pay, C. (2001). Social accounting: a method for assessing the impact of enterprise development activities. EDIAIS. Traidcraft exchange.
40. Pearce, J. (2002). Some contemporary issues in social accounting and audit. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 22(1), 1-7.
41. Pearce, J. (2009). Social economy: engaging as a third system? The Social Economy: international perspectives on economic solidarity, London: Zed Books Ltd, 22-33.
42. Pearce, J., Kay, A., & Network, S. A. (2008). Really telling accounts. Social Audit Network, 1-32.
43. Rinaldi, L. (2019). Accounting for sustainability governance: The enabling role of social and environmental accountability research: Taylor & Francis.
44. Ritson, P. (2009). Social Accounting, Mega Accounting and Beyond: A Festschrift in Honour of MR Mathews. The Accounting Review, 84(6), 2043.
45. Romi, A., Cook, K. A., & Dixon-Fowler, H. R. (2018). The influence of social responsibility on employee productivity and sales growth. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal.
46. Rotheroe, N., & Richards, A. (2007). Social return on investment and social enterprise: transparent accountability for sustainable development. Social Enterprise Journal.
47. Sarfraz, M., Qun, W., Abdullah, M. I., & Alvi, A. T. (2018). Employees’ Perception of Corporate Social Responsibility Impact on Employee Outcomes: Mediating Role of Organizational Justice for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). Sustainability, 10(7), 2429.
48. Schaltegger, S. (2018). Linking Environmental Management Accounting: A Reflection on (Missing) Links to Sustainability and Planetary Boundaries. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 38(1), 19-29. doi:10.1080/0969160X.2017.1395351
49. Shearer, T. (2002). Ethics and accountability: from the for-itself to the for-the-other. Accounting, organizations and society, 27(6), 541-573. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00036-8
50. Situ, H., & Tilt, C. (2018). Mandatory? Voluntary? A Discussion of Corporate Environmental Disclosure Requirements in China. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 38(2), 131-144. doi:10.1080/0969160X.2018.1469423
51. Vik, P. (2017). What’s so social about Social Return on Investment? A critique of quantitative social accounting approaches drawing on experiences of international microfinance. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 37(1), 6-17.
52. Vlachos, Panagopoulos, Bachrach, & Morgeson. (2017). The Effects of Managerial and Employee Attributions for Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives. . Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(7), 1111-1129.
53. Vlachos, P. A., Panagopoulos, N. G., Bachrach, D. G., & Morgeson, F. P. (2017). The effects of managerial and employee attributions for corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of organizational behavior, 38(7), 1111-1129. doi:10.1002/job.2189
54. Voegtlin, C., & Greenwood, M. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and human resource management: A systematic review and conceptual analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 26(3), 181-197.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
