Relationship of oxidative enzymes with biochemical parameters in breast cancer patients

Authors

  • Yogesh Bansal Dr. Yogesh Bansal, Department of Biochemistry, Rajshree Medical Research Institute, Bareilly (U.P.)- 243501 Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/28bbv551

Keywords:

Breast Cancer, Antioxidant Enzymes, Biochemical Parameters, Liver-function enzymes

Abstract

Background - Breast cancer has a complex aetiology. Significant breast cancer risk factors include age, food, obesity, inactivity, hormone replacement therapy, family history, and others. Our current study's objective was to evaluate the electrolyte and biochemical parameter values in both breast cancer patients and healthy individuals. We have also investigated the link between the antioxidant enzymes and levels of electrolytes.

Methods- The data came from 292 individuals who took part in closely supervised clinical research on the correlation between oxidative enzymes and biochemical indicators in breast cancer patients. Finding the connection between biochemical markers and oxidative enzymes in breast cancer patients was the goal of this open, non-randomized study.

Results- Aside from albumin, which has significantly increased in the healthy control patients (P = 0.04), no alterations in liver indicators like amylase and glucose were found. The most notable increases in K+, Ca2+, and PO43 were seen in patients with low baseline levels (P = 0.05). In the group of patients with breast cancer, it was also discovered that Na+ and PO43 increased significantly (P = 0.05).

Conclusion- Patients with breast cancer had elevated levels of YGT, LDH, ALP, urea, and phosphate, which might be employed as serum indicators for early identification of breast cancer. Antioxidant enzyme levels, on the other hand, were considerably lower in breast cancer patients.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ludwig H, Van Belle S, Barrett-Lee P, et al. The European Cancer Anaemia Survey (ECAS): a large, multinational, prospective survey defining the prevalence, incidence, and treatment of anaemia in cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40(15):2293-2306.

2. Hong J, Woo HS, Kim H, et al. Anemia as a useful biomarker in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP immunochemotherapy. Cancer Sci. 2014;105(12):1569-1575.

3. Shaikh AJ, Bawany SA, Masood N, et al. Incidence and impact of baseline electrolyte abnormalities in patients admitted with chemotherapy induced febrile neutropenia. J Cancer. 2011;2:62-66.

4. Field KM, Dow C, Michael M. Part I: Liver function in oncology: biochemistry and beyond. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(11):1092-1101.

5. Geerse DA, Bindels AJ, Kuiper MA, Roos AN, Spronk PE, Schultz MJ. Treatment of hypophosphatemia in the intensive care unit: a review. Crit Care. 2010;14(4):R147.

6. Penack O, Rempf P, Eisenblatter M, et al. Bloodstream infections in neutropenic patients: early detection of pathogens and directed antimicrobial therapy due to surveillance blood cultures. Ann Oncol. 2007;18(11):1870-1874.

7. Karihtala P, Soini Y. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant mechanisms in human tissues and their relation to malignancies. APMIS. 2007;115:81-103.

8. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: cancer and chemotherapy-induced anemia. NCCN, USA, vol 2, p 47. 2009.

9. Saulter KH, Acharia CR, Walters KS, et al. An integrated approach to the prediction of chemotherapeutic response in patients with breast cancer. PLoS One. 2008;3(4):e1908.

10. Niki E. Lipid peroxidation: physiological levels and dual biological effects. Free Radic Biol Med. 2009;47:469-484.

11. Schrijvers D. Role of red blood cells in pharmacokinetics of chemotherapeutic agents. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42(9):779-791.

12. Hadzic T, Aykin-Burns N, Zhu Y, et al. Paclitaxel combined with inhibitors of glucose, hydroperoxide metabolism enhances breast cancer cell killing via H2O2 mediated oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 2010;48:1024-1033.

13. Ilyasova D, Mixon G, Wang F, et al. Markers of oxidative status in a clinical model of oxidative assault: a pilot study in human blood following doxorubicin administration. Biomarkers. 2009;14(5):321-325.

14. Chala E, Manes C, Iliades H, Skaragkas G, Mouratidou D, Kapantais E. Insulin resistance, growth factors and cytokine levels in overweight women with breast cancer before and after chemotherapy. Hormones. 2006;5(2):137-146.

15. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC. Free radicals in biology and medicine. 4th ed. Oxford University, New York, 2007.

16. Aebi H. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 1984;105:121-126.

17. Marklund S, Marklund G. Involvement of the superoxide anion radical in the autoxidation of pyrogallol and a convenient assay for superoxide dismutase. Eur J Biochem. 1974;47:474-496.

18. Sedlak J, Lindsay RH. Estimation of total, protein-bound, and nonprotein sulfhydryl groups in tissue with Ellman’s reagent. Anal Biochem. 1968;25:192-205.

19. Repetto M, Reides C, Carretero MLG, Costa M, Griemberg G, Llesuy S. Oxidative stress in blood of HIV infected patients. Clin Chim Acta. 1996;225:107-117.

20. Simao ANC, Suzukawa AA, Casado MF, Oliveira RD, Guarnier FA, Cecchini F. Genistein abrogates pre-hemolytic and oxidative stress damage induced by 2,2-azobis(amidinopropane). Life Sci. 2006;78:1202-1210.

21. Reznick AZ, Packer L. Oxidative damage to proteins: spectrophotometric method for carbonyl assay. Methods Enzymol. 1994;233:357-363.

22. Miller GL. Protein determination for large numbers of samples. Anal Chem. 1959;31:964.

23. Barbosa DS, Cecchini R, El Kadri MZ, Dichi I. Decrease oxidative stress in patients with ulcerative colitis supplemented with fish oil omega-3 fatty acids. Nutrition. 2003;19:837-841.

24. Fossey J, Lefort D, Sorba J. Free Radicals in Organic Chemistry. Wiley, New York, 1995.

25. Beckman JS, Koppenol WH. Nitric oxide, superoxide, and peroxynitrite: the good, the bad, and ugly. Am J Physiol. 1996;271:C1424-C1437.

Downloads

Published

18.12.2019

How to Cite

Bansal, Y. (2019). Relationship of oxidative enzymes with biochemical parameters in breast cancer patients. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 23(6), 1838-1841. https://doi.org/10.61841/28bbv551