Psycho-dynamic Forcefulness through the lens of George R. R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire: A Lacanian Reading

Authors

  • Thulfiqar Abdulameer Sulaiman Alhmdni PhD Candidate, Department of Foreign Languages, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran Author
  • Fazel Asadi Amjad Professor, Department of Foreign Languages, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/q4t4nz72

Keywords:

Desire, Lacan, Dynamic, A Game of Thrones, Symbolic Order

Abstract

A Song of Ice and Fire, which is the focal point of this article, overflows with the subjects as family, obligation and honor strung in confounded courses in our current reality where dream and genuine move side by side. By booming through the first two books of this series, A Game of Thrones and A Clash of Kings, one finds the assortment of the points of view and delves profound into the personalities and their activities which lead to every one of the contentions and disturbances. This effort tries to reveal insight into the convoluted ways and the grave choices of the characters are blossomed that give fierce shake to their entire world; for this we attract upon Lacanian Psychoanalysis to portrait how the most complicated political interests just as the most flawless privileged demonstrations that are seen all through these books are predicated upon desire, which is, as Lacan says, ‘desire of the other’. This work attempts to show the appliance of desire, dynamism and vitality by examining the characters and occasions and afterward talk about the way that the craving of the Other brings forth every code of honor, intolerable hostility, desire for power.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1977). Anti-Oedipus. Viking Penguin Publication. Print.

[2] Wells-Lassagne, S. (2014). Religious Aesthetics in Game of Thrones. TV/Series 5. Web.

[3] Habib, R. (2005). A History of Literary Criticism: From Plato to the Present. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub. Print.

[4] Silverman, E. J., et al. The Ultimate Game of Thrones and Philosophy. Print.

[5] Carroll, L. (2013). Humorous Verse of Lewis Carroll. Dover Publications. Print.

[6] Frankel, V. E. (2014). Women in Game of Thrones. McFarland and Company, Inc. Print.

[7] Hall, D. E. (2004). Subjectivity. Routledge Publication. Print.

[8] Homer, S. (2005). Lacan. Routledge Publication. Print.

[9] Martin, G. R. R. (2013). A Song of Ice and Fire. New York, NY: Bantam Books. Print.

[10] Mondschein, K. (2017). Game of Thrones and the Medieval Art of War. McFarland & Company. Print.

[11] Purdon, J. (2000). Thinking in Painting: Gilles Deleuze and the Revolution from Representation to Abstraction (PhD thesis). University of Warwick.

[12] Zizek, S. (2008). In Defense of Lost Causes. Verso Publication. Print.

[13] Zizek, S. (2005). Interrogating the Real. Bloomsbury Academics. Print.

[14] Martin, G. R. R. (1996). A Game of Thrones. New York: Bantam Spectra.

[15] Martin, G. R. R. (1999). A Clash of Kings. New York: Bantam Spectra.

[16] Martin, G. R. R. (2000). A Storm of Swords. New York: Bantam Spectra.

[17] Martin, G. R. R. (2005). A Feast for Crows. New York: Bantam Spectra.

[18] Martin, G. R. R. (2011). A Dance with Dragons. New York: Bantam Spectra

Downloads

Published

09.10.2025

How to Cite

Sulaiman Alhmdni, T. A., & Amjad, F. A. (2025). Psycho-dynamic Forcefulness through the lens of George R. R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire: A Lacanian Reading. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 23(6), 1557-1566. https://doi.org/10.61841/q4t4nz72