ALTERNATIVES TO ALGINATE IMPRESSION MATERIALS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/zwvjwt18Keywords:
Alternatives, Alginate, Impression material, Dust freeAbstract
The review is about alternatives to alginate impression material. It is an irreversible hydrocolloid used to study cast and fabricate models for intraoral appliances and is commonly used impression material. It is effective but hydrophilic which makes it difficult. Alginate impression materials produces an imprint which provides all the details which has good accuracy and undercut is also recorded. It is a most commonly used material in daily practice. The applications of alginates include thickeners and stabilizers in the food, pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries. It is well tolerated by patients and accounts for the primary prosthetic, orthodontic and dental imprints. Method:Articles were collected from search engines like PubMed, Google scholar, Medline etc
Downloads
References
1. Willms M, Washington M, Sheridan C. Dental assisting education and curriculum design. Dental Nursing 2012;8:384–6. https://doi.org/10.12968/denn.2012.8.6.384
2. Jyothi S, Robin PK, Ganapathy D, Anand Selvaraj. Periodontal Health Status of Three Different Groups Wearing Temporary Partial Denture. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2017; 10:4339.
3. Inside Story. Volume 41, Number 3, June 2014 2019. https://doi.org/10.1287/orms.2014.03.01
4. Selvan SR, Ganapathy D. Efficacy of fifth generation cephalosporins against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-A review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2016;9:1815. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2016.00369.3
5. Skinner EW, Carlisle FB. The use of alginate impression materials in the Sears’ hydrocolloid impression technique. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1956;6:405–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(56)90060-9
6. Ranganathan H, Ganapathy DM, Jain AR. Cervical and Incisal Marginal Discrepancy in Ceramic Laminate Veneering Materials: A SEM Analysis. Contemp Clin Dent 2017; 8:272–8.
7.Website n.d. Rubel BS. Impression Materials: A Comparative Review of Impression Materials Most Commonly Used in Restorative Dentistry [Internet]. Vol. 51, Dental Clinics of North America. 2007. p. 629–42. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2007.03.006
(accessed June 9, 2020).
8. Ashok V, Suvitha S. Awareness of all ceramic restoration in rural population. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2016;9:1691. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2016.00340.1
9. Taylor RL, Wright PS, Maryan C. Disinfection procedures: their effect on the dimensional accuracy and surface quality of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials and gypsum casts. Dent Mater 2002;18:103–10.
10. Subasree S, Murthykumar K, Dhanraj. Effect of Aloe Vera in Oral Health-A Review. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2016; 9:609.
11. Sorrentino R, Gherlone EF, Calesini G, Zarone F. Effect of Implant Angulation, Connection Length, and Impression Material on the Dimensional Accuracy of Implant Impressions: An In Vitro Comparative Study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2009;12:e63–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00167.x
12. Ganapathy DM, Kannan A, Venugopalan S. Effect of Coated Surfaces influencing Screw Loosening in Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World Journal of Dentistry 2017;8:496–502. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1493
13. Ratnaweera PM, Yoshida K, Miura H, Kohta A, Tsuchihira K. A clinical evaluation of the agar alginate combined impression: dimensional accuracy of dies by new master crown technique. J Med Dent Sci 2003;50:231–8.
14. Kannan A, Venugopalan S. A systematic review on the effect of use of impregnated retraction cords on gingiva. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2018;11:2121. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2018.00393.1
15. Website n.d. Christensen GJ. Making fixed prostheses that are not too high [Internet]. Vol. 137, The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2006. p. 96–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0027
(accessed June 9, 2020).
16. Basha FYS, Ganapathy D, Venugopalan S. Oral Hygiene Status among Pregnant Women. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2018;11:3099. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2018.00569.3
17. Website n.d. Rubel BS. Impression Materials: A Comparative Review of Impression Materials Most Commonly Used in Restorative Dentistry [Internet]. Vol. 51, Dental Clinics of North America. 2007. p. 629–42. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2007.03.006
(accessed June 9, 2020).
18. Ashok V, Nallaswamy D, Benazir Begum S, Nesappan T. Lip Bumper Prosthesis for an Acromegaly Patient: A Clinical Report. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 2014;14:279–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0339-6
19. Walker MP, Burckhard J, Mitts DA, Williams KB. Dimensional change over time of extended-storage alginate impression materials. The Angle Orthodontist 2010;80:1110–5. https://doi.org/10.2319/031510-150.1
20. Wadhwa S, Mehta R, Duggal N, Vasudeva K. The effect of pouring time on the dimensional accuracy of casts made from different irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry 2013;4:313. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237x.118368
21. Goodkind RJ, Schulte RC. Dimensional accuracy of pour acrylic resin and conventional processing of cold-curing acrylic resin bases. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1970;24:662–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(70)90103-4
22. Website n.d. Craig RG. Review of Dental Impression Materials [Internet]. Vol. 2, Advances in Dental Research. 1988. p. 51–64. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08959374880020012001(accessed June 9, 2020).
23. McKinnon M, White L. Simulation Facilities Compatibility in Design for Compatibility in Space. SAE Technical Paper Series 1987. https://doi.org/10.4271/871716
24. Crabill MP. Revised Main Disinfection Procedure. Journal - American Water Works Association 1953;45:832–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1953.tb16494.x
25. Lee K, Philips BA, McFadden RS, Mahajan S. Microstructural characteristics of mixed III–V epitaxial layers. Materials Science and Engineering: B 1995;32:231–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-5107(95)03013-1
26. Cervino G. Impression materials: does water affect the performance of alginates? Minerva Stomatologica 2020;69. https://doi.org/10.23736/s0026-4970.19.04293-6
27. Frey G, Lu H, Powers J. Effect of Mixing Methods on Mechanical Properties of Alginate Impression Materials. Journal of Prosthodontics 2005;14:221–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849x.2005.00047.x
28. Jow H, Amos W, Luo H, Zhang Y, Burroughs NJ. A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method for Estimating Population Mixing Using Y-chromosome Markers: Mixing of the Han People in China. Annals of Human Genetics 2007;71:407–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.2006.00329.x
29. Washizawa N, Narusawa H, Tamaki Y, Miyazaki T. Production of a calcium silicate cement material from alginate impression material. Dental Materials Journal 2012;31:629–34. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2012-027
30. https://paperpile.com/c/EdrSlA/QQ1B(accessed June 9, 2020).
31. Venugopalan S, Ariga P, Aggarwal P, Viswanath A. Magnetically retained silicone facial prosthesis. Niger J Clin Pract 2014;17:260–4.
32. Ganapathy D, Sathyamoorthy A, Ranganathan H, Murthykumar K. Effect of Resin Bonded Luting Agents Influencing Marginal Discrepancy in All Ceramic Complete Veneer Crowns. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:ZC67–70.
33. Ariga P, Nallaswamy D, Jain AR, Ganapathy DM. Determination of Correlation of Width of Maxillary Anterior Teeth using Extraoral and Intraoral Factors in Indian Population: A Systematic Review. World Journal of Dentistry 2018;9:68–75.
34. https://paperpile.com/c/EdrSlA/Bndv(accessed June 9, 2020).
35. Duraisamy R, Krishnan CS, Ramasubramanian H, Sampathkumar J, Mariappan S, NavarasampattiSivaprakasam A. Compatibility of Nonoriginal Abutments with Implants: Evaluation of Microgap at the Implant-Abutment Interface, With Original and Nonoriginal Abutments. Implant Dent 2019;28:289–95.
36. Vijayalakshmi B, Ganapathy D. Medical management of cellulitis. Intern Jour Contemp Microbiol 2016;9:2067.
37. Ajay R, Suma K, Ali S, Sivakumar JK, Rakshagan V, Devaki V, et al. Effect of surface modifications on the retention of cement-retained implant crowns under fatigue loads: An In vitro study. Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences 2017;9:154. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_146_17
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
