A Study on Perceptions on Managers on corporate social responsibility (CSR)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/8vaq2j11Keywords:
Manager, corporate, socialAbstract
Creating a strong business and building a better world are not conflicting goals; they are both essential ingredients for long term- success.” – William Clay Corporate and markets are not created by God or nature, but by the business man. Intention of business must travel beyond the walls of the rigid corporate structure flowing into the lives of the needy and the anxious. In fact, it must contribute to the growth of the society since a business enterprise is a growth stimulator of society. “The purpose of business is to serve the society,” so said one of the successful business legends of India, J R D Tata. Business corporations are perhaps the most influential organizations in society and have long been recognized as important contributors to the common good. Society, grants corporations unique privileges in order to harness their great capacities to serve its needs. Today, companies realize their responsibility to serve the stakeholder and society to whom they owe their existence. Millions of people lack in basic amenities and dwell in poverty: a situation that cannot be resolved by the government alone, which is the only hope of the people. But one single hand can’t make a sound. That is an adequate reason, for concerted action on the part of powerful corporations, those who contribute to make the difference in society. For example, in the 1940’s, the founding father of Adithya Birla group of companies Shri G.D. Birla espoused the ‘Trusteeship’ concept of management. With that motive, they started to invest part of their profits beyond business, for the larger good of society.
Downloads
References
1. Abagail McWilliams, Donald S. Siegel (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications, Chicago Working Papers in Economics Department of Economics, USA. Number 0506, May.
2. Abdul Farooq Khan (2009). Managerial Responses to Social Responsibility Challenge. Indian Management Vol.20, No9, pp.13-19.
3. Agata Chudzicka Czupała (2013). Ethical Ideology as a Predictor of Ethical Decision Making. Department of Psychology, University of Silesia, Poland, The International Journal of management and Business, June Vol. 4 Issue 1.
4. Barry R. Schlenker, Donelson R. Forsyth (1977). On the Ethics of Psychological Research University of Florida. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13, 369-396.
5. Bert van de Ven, Johan (2006). Strategic and Moral Motivation for Corporate Social Responsibility. JCC 22, Summer 2006, Tilburg University, Nether land.
6. Catherine Mc Cabe Rhea Ingram Mary Conway Dato (2006). The Business of Ethics and Gender. Journal of Business Ethics 64: 101–116 _ DOI 10.1007/s10551005-3327-x 2006.
7. Chamhuri Siwar, Siti Haslina Md Harizan (2007). A Study on Corporate Social Responsibility Practices amongst Business Organizations in Malaysia.
8. Donaldson T and Dunfee T.W. (2000), Précis for: Ties that Bind. Business and Society Review, 105, p
436.stitute for Environment and Development (LESTARI) University, Malaysia.
9. Ford R.C, Richardson W D. (1994). Ethical Decision Making: A Review of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics.13, pp.205-221.
10. Gill Leinbach. (1983). Corporate Social Responsibility in Hong Kong. California Management Review, Vol. XXV, No. 2, January, pp. 107-109.
11. Hand book of Corporate Social Responsibility (2013). CSR Handbook, India, Price Water House Coopers Private Limited. NJ 123 - Nov 2013.
12. Jensen M C (1986). Agency Cost of Free Cash Flow. Corporate Finance and Takeovers’, American Economic Review, 76.
13. LailaMemdani (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility of Small and Medium Enterprises in India, National Monthly Refereed Journal of Research in Commerce and Management, vol.no.1, Issue No.10, ISSN No.2277- 1166.
14. Martin J Osborne and Ariel Rubinstein (1994). A course in Game Theory. MIT Press ISBN 0-262-65040-1.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.