DIFFERENT TYPES OF GINGIVAL SHADES USED IN FABRICATING AN AESTHETIC FIXED PARTIAL DENTURE

Authors

  • Karthik EVG Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai-77 Author
  • Dr.Venkatesh Kommi Senior lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai Author
  • Dr.Uma Maheshwari T.N Professor and Head Of Admin, Dept. Of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai-77 Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/xfefzt27

Keywords:

Celtra ceram shade guide, Fixed partial denture, Gingival ceramics, Shade matching

Abstract

A heavy global burden of periodontal disease can have an undeniable negative. Replacing the partially edentulous area in the anterior region can be challenging in achieving an optimal aesthetic result. In the field of dentistry, its superior basis for achieving aesthetics and to replace and replicate the appearance of teeth to mimic nature to its closest sense and form.The aim of the study is to check the frequency of gingival shades used in the fabrication of fixed partial denture.The current study is an institutional based retrospective study performed over a review of 49832 cases.The results obtained shows the frequency ranges of gingival shades used in a fixed partial denture with gingival ceramics.Within the limitations of the study, The most common type of shade used was G2 and the most common gender undergoing treatment were male subjects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ariga P, Nallaswamy D, Jain AR, Ganapathy DM. Determination of Correlation of Width of Maxillary Anterior Teeth using Extraoral and Intraoral Factors in Indian Population: A Systematic Review [Internet]. Vol. 9, World Journal of Dentistry. 2018. p. 68–75. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1509

2. Ganapathy D, Sathyamoorthy A, Ranganathan H, Murthykumar K. Effect of Resin Bonded Luting Agents Influencing Marginal Discrepancy in All Ceramic Complete Veneer Crowns. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Dec;10(12):ZC67–70.

3. Bhuvaneswaran M. Principles of smile design. J Conserv Dent. 2010 Oct;13(4):225–32.

4. Sonune SJ, Kumar S, Jadhav MS, Martande S. Gingival-colored Porcelain: A Clinical Report of an Esthetic-prosthetic Paradigm. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2017 Oct;7(4):275–7.

5. Ganapathy DM, Kannan A, Venugopalan S. Effect of Coated Surfaces influencing Screw Loosening in Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [Internet]. Vol. 8, World Journal of Dentistry. 2017. p. 496–502. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1493

6. Basha FYS, Ganapathy D, Venugopalan S. Oral Hygiene Status among Pregnant Women [Internet]. Vol. 11, Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018. p. 3099. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2018.00569.3

7. Wahbi MA, Al Sharief HS, Tayeb H, Bokhari A. Minimally invasive use of coloured composite resin in aesthetic restoration of periodontially involved teeth: Case report. Saudi Dent J. 2013 Apr;25(2):83–9.

8. Sadaqah NR, Tair JAA. Prosthetic reconstruction using gingiva-colored ceramic agent in fixed partial restoration in a 24-year old patient. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2012 Nov 30;4:37–41.

9. Ajay R, Suma K, Ali S, Sivakumar JK, Rakshagan V, Devaki V, et al. Effect of surface modifications on the retention of cement-retained implant crowns under fatigue loads: An In vitro study [Internet]. Vol. 9, Journal Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences. 2017. p. 154. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_146_17

10. Ankli V, Limeira FIR, Yamauti M, Sá TCM. Gingival Veneer Used as Prosthetic Solution for Esthetic Compromised Malpositioned Dental Implant. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Jan;9(1):123–7.

11. Ashok V, Nallaswamy D, Benazir Begum S, Nesappan T. Lip Bumper Prosthesis for an Acromegaly Patient: A Clinical Report. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014 Dec;14(Suppl 1):279–82.

12. Ashok V, Suvitha S. Awareness of all ceramic restoration in rural population [Internet]. Vol. 9, Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016. p. 1691. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2016.00340.1

13. Keyf F. Gingival epithesis in periodontally compromised patient for esthetic solution [Internet]. Vol. 7, SRM Journal of Research in Dental Sciences. 2016. p. 255. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-433x.195674

14. Manappallil J. Denture Resins and Polymers [Internet]. Basic Dental Materials. 2016. p. 529–529. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp/books/12669_30

15. Papaspyridakos P, Amin S, El-Rafie K, Weber H-P. Technique to Match Gingival Shade when Using Pink Ceramics for Anterior Fixed Implant Prostheses. J Prosthodont. 2018 Mar;27(3):311–3.

16. Bokadia GS, Sneha. Bokadia G, Sathish, Ariga P. Trauma Due to Occlusion – A Review [Internet]. Vol. 11, Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018. p. 3577. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2018.00658.3

17. Shetty P, Bhat S, Anand M. Shade matching in fixed prosthodontics using instrumental color measurements and computers [Internet]. Vol. 7, The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2007. p. 179. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.41068

18. Jyothi S, Robin PK, Ganapathy D, Anandiselvaraj. Periodontal Health Status of Three Different Groups Wearing Temporary Partial Denture [Internet]. Vol. 10, Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2017. p. 4339. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2017.00795.8

19. Zahnfabrik V. VITA shade guides [Internet]. VITA Zahnfabrik. [cited 2020 Jun 8]. Available from: https://www.vita-zahnfabrik.com/en/VITA-shade-guides-31233.html

20. Sikri VK. Color: Implications in dentistry. J Conserv Dent. 2010 Oct;13(4):249–55.

21. Powers JM. Commentary. shade guide optimization-a novel shade arrangement principle for both ceramic and composite shade guides when identifying composite test objects [Internet]. Vol. 23, Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2011. p. 33–33. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00384.x

22. Corciolani G, Vichi A, Louca C, Ferrari M. Color match of two different ceramic systems to selected shades of one shade guide [Internet]. Vol. 105, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2011. p. 171–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(11)60025-5

23. Subasree S, Murthykumar K, Dhanraj. Effect of Aloe Vera in Oral Health-A Review [Internet]. Vol. 9, Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016. p. 609. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2016.00116.5

24. Vijayalakshmi B, Ganapathy D. Medical management of cellulitis [Internet]. Vol. 9, Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016. p. 2067. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2016.00422.4

26. Ranganathan H, Ganapathy DM, Jain AR. Cervical and Incisal Marginal Discrepancy in Ceramic Laminate Veneering Materials: A SEM Analysis. Contemp Clin Dent. 2017 Apr;8(2):272–8.

27. Venugopalan S, Ariga P, Aggarwal P, Viswanath A. Magnetically retained silicone facial prosthesis. Niger J Clin Pract. 2014 Mar;17(2):260–4.

Farhat Yaasmeen Sadique Basha, Rajeshkumar S, Lakshmi T, Anti-inflammatory activity of Myristica fragrans. Int. J. Res. Pharm. Sci., 2019;10(4), 3118-3120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26452/ijrps.v10i4.1607

28. Kannan A, Venugopalan S. A systematic review on the effect of use of impregnated retraction cords on gingiva [Internet]. Vol. 11, Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018. p. 2121. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2018.00393.1

Downloads

Published

02.12.2019

How to Cite

EVG, K., Kommi, V., & TN, U. M. (2019). DIFFERENT TYPES OF GINGIVAL SHADES USED IN FABRICATING AN AESTHETIC FIXED PARTIAL DENTURE . International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 23(6), 899-907. https://doi.org/10.61841/xfefzt27