Review Paper on Downsizing

Authors

  • Sasmita Mohanty Department of Management, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/8nywrp11

Keywords:

Delayering, Employee downsizing, Layoffs, Redundancy and Triangulation method

Abstract

As the downsizing of employees has become increasingly ubiquitous in recent years, the study of this phenomenon has taken on greater importance. The paper explores an integrative structure that combines environmental and organizational contexts, as well as downsizing consequences for individuals and organizations. Core scientific studies are checked, finding important trends and inconsistencies. The incidences of downsizing activities across economies and across organizations have been growing globally. This was seen as the basis on which to deal with increased competition. The present paper is looking into some downsizing studies. The paper focuses mainly on the research methodology used in those studies. This paper analyzes the approaches used for downsizing research and proposes the optimal study methods for: a) organizational outcomes and b) individual outcomes, including victims, survivors, and implementers. The recommendation is to have context-specific and problem specific studies with greater emphasis on the triangulation of qualitative and quantitative methods in order to improve study soundness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] D. K. Datta, J. P. Guthrie, D. Basuil, and A. Pandey, “Causes and effects of employee downsizing: A review and synthesis,” Journal of Management. 2010, doi: 10.1177/0149206309346735.

[2] E. Bernard, L. A. O. Penna, and E. Araújo, “Downgrading, downsizing, degazettement, and reclassification of protected areas in Brazil,” Conserv. Biol., 2014, doi: 10.1111/cobi.12298.

[3] P. M. Norman, F. C. Butler, and A. L. Ranft, “Resources Matter: Examining the Effects of Resources on the State of Firms Following Downsizing,” J. Manage., 2013, doi: 10.1177/0149206312443560.

[4] D. Van Dierendonck and G. Jacobs, “Survivors and victims, a meta-analytical review of fairness and organizational commitment after downsizing,” Br. J. Manag., 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00724.x.

[5] J. M. Lahner, B. Hayslip, T. N. McKelvy, and D. M. Caballero, “Employee age and reactions to downsizing,” Int. J. Aging Hum. Dev., 2014, doi: 10.2190/AG.79.3.c.

[6] S. Modrek and M. R. Cullen, “Job insecurity during recessions: Effects on survivors’ work stress,” BMC Public Health, 2013, doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-929.

[7] F. Gandolfi and M. Hansson, “Causes and consequences of downsizing: Towards an integrative framework,” Journal of Management and Organization. 2011, doi: 10.1017/s1833367200001413.

[8] R. Watson, “Quantitative research,” Nurs. Stand., 2015, doi: 10.7748/ns.29.31.44.e8681.

[9] A. K. Bekhet and J. A. Zauszniewski, “Methodological triangulation: An approach to understanding data,” Nurse Res., 2012, doi: 10.7748/nr2012.11.20.2.40.c9442.

[10] A. Maxmen, “Big pharma’s - Cost-cutting challenger,” Nature, 2016, doi: 10.1038/536388a.

Downloads

Published

29.11.2019

How to Cite

Mohanty, S. (2019). Review Paper on Downsizing. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 23(6), 606-612. https://doi.org/10.61841/8nywrp11