Review on Strategic Human Resource Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/4wc7fd78Keywords:
Business Strategy, Competitive Advantage, HPWS, HR Strategy, SHRM, Organizational PerformanceAbstract
The aim of this paper is to discuss the important relationship between the High Performance Working System (HPWS) as the main component of Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) and organizational performance as the basis for the determination of sustainable competitive advantage. It also explores the link between HR strategy and business strategy. Findings validated the association between SHRM-HPWS and the financial as well as non-financial (employee outcome) organizational performance based on literature review as demonstrated. HR strategy is also linked to business strategy as it contributes to maintaining high-quality customer satisfaction, performing high-quality, loving employees, and maintaining employee dedication and commitment to the organization for successful and sustainable competitive advantage. It thus strengthens employee growth, motivation and willingness to remain in the company longer. To conclude, to maintain the competitive advantage, organizational efficiency can be achieved through different sources. Also the conceptual framework illustrates how the study comes into conclusion.
Downloads
References
[1] C. Caldwell and V. Anderson, Strategic human resource management. 2018.
[2] D. Shin and A. M. Konrad, “Causality Between High-Performance Work Systems and Organizational Performance,” J. Manage., 2017, doi: 10.1177/0149206314544746.
[3] A. Bish, C. Newton, and K. Johnston, “Leader vision and diffusion of hr policy during change,” J. Organ. Chang. Manag., 2015, doi: 10.1108/JOCM-12-2013-0248.
[4] J. D. Kammeyer-Mueller, “Human Resource Management Practices,” in The Encyclopedia of Adulthood and Aging, 2015.
[5] A. Bharadwaj, O. A. El Sawy, P. A. Pavlou, and N. Venkatraman, “Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights,” MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst., 2013, doi: 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37:2.3.
[6] G. Santhoshkumar, S. Jayanthy, and R. Velanganni, “Employee engagement,” J. Adv. Res. Dyn. Control Syst., 2019, doi: 10.5373/JARDCS/V11/20192677.
[7] R. Ball, J. Gerakos, J. T. Linnainmaa, and V. V. Nikolaev, “Deflating profitability,” J. financ. econ., 2015,
doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.02.004.
[8] P. Management, “International Journal od Productivity and Performance Management,” Int. J. od Product. Perform. Manag., 2019.
[9] C. A. O’Reilly and M. L. Tushman, “Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future,” Acad. Manag. Perspect., 2013, doi: 10.5465/amp.2013.0025.
[10] J. P. Faguet, “Decentralization and Governance,” World Dev., 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.002.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
