Developing an English communicative competence training course for non-English-major teachers in Thailand
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/d7m8yj04Keywords:
English, Communication, Competency, Training Course, on-English major teachers, ASEANAbstract
In the contemporary communicative landscape and for the foreseeable future, professionals need to be competent users of English given that this language is used worldwide. On this basis, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has designated English a “working language” among ASEAN countries. Further, the government of Thailand requires that all Thai students learn English as their first foreign language. However, this is problematic inasmuch as most English teachers, particularly those teaching at the primary level, did not graduate with a major in English. Therefore, they are unlikely to be able to provide the most effective instruction to their students.
This study focuses on developing English communicative competence training courses for and evaluating the English communicative competence of non-English-major teachers in Thailand. The training course was developed and designed in reference to seven elements: (1) the principles and significance of the training course, (2) objectives, (3) structure of the program, (4) activities and duration (5) the media used during the training course, (6) assessment, and (7) expected benefits. On completing the course, the participants’ scores on an English- language test improved significantly, by 0.05 on average. The participants’ scores for all elements of English pronunciation and communication in the classroom were higher after the training course than before it. Further, the participants reported a high level of satisfaction with the program, with an average value of 4.50 and a standard deviation of 0.47. Overall, the program was shown to benefit the development of English communication competence on the part of English teachers without a degree in English.
Downloads
References
1. Allen, M. (2017). The Sage encyclopedia of communication research methods. London: Sage Publications.
2. Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford
3. University Press.
4. Basturkmen, H. (2010). Developing courses in English for specific purposes. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Chaisom, W. (2018).The Important of English in Era of Industrial Revolution. [Online] Available: http://ejournal.nidtep.go.th/PDF/pdf5be2aa21d52dc.pdf (January 12, 2019)
6. Chavangklang, P., & Chavangklang, T. (2018). A development of foreign language training course for local youth guides of Dankwian community in Thailand. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(4),
187. doi: 10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.4p.187
7. Dahbi, M. (2017). Towards an ESP course for engineering students in vocational schools in Morocco: The case of the National School of Applied Sciences. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2895541
8. Davies, A., & Munby, J. (1981). Communicative syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 15(3),
9. 332. doi: 10.2307/3586758
10. Doungprom, U., Phusee-on S, & Prachanant, N. (2016). The development desire of non-English major teachers in small rural primary schools in Thailand: Participatory action research. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(16), 1612–1621. doi: 10.5897/ERR2015.2415
11. Dhanasobhon, S. (2006). English language teaching dilemma in Thailand. [Online] Available: http://www.curriculumandinstruction.org/index.php?lay=show&ac=article&Id=539134523& Ntype=7 (January 12, 2019).
12. Duangphummet, N., & Chandransu, N. (2016). Approaches to enhance English communicative competence of Thai people: A synthetic account of targeted research series in English learning promotion. Journal of Language and Culture, 35(2) (July–December 2016), 77–96.
13. Faeen, J. A. M. (2017). ESP syllabus design: Developing a needs based communicative course to enhance the employability skills of engineering students. GYANODAYA – The Journal of Progressive Education, 10(2), 55. doi: 10.5958/2229-4422.2017.00016.0
14. Flora, D. F. (2008). Developing English for General Academic Purposes (EDAP) Course in an Indonesian University. English Department, Faculty of Letters, Petra Christian University. 10(1), June 2008: 53–62. [Online] Available: http://www.petra.ac.id/~puslit/journals/dir.php?DepartmentI D=ING.
15. Graves, K. (1996). Teachers as course developers. England: Cambridge University Press.
16. Harrison, R. (1996). The training of ESP teachers in Russia. English for Specific Purposes – Russia, 2: 24–26.
17. Hirch, R. (2017). Developing an ESP Course for Hairstylists. [Online] Available: https://rhirch.public.iastate.edu/hairproject/textbook/needsanalysis.pdf (January 8, 2019)
18. Hyland, K. (2000). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach; Tony Dudley-Evans and Maggie-Jo St John. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998, 301 pp. English for Specific Purposes, 19(3), 297–300. doi:10.1016/s0889-4906(99)00026-5
19. Hutchison, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A learner-centered approach. England: Cambridge University Press.
20. Janpha Thadphoothon (2017). English Language Competence of Thai School Teachers, Economics & Management Innovations, 1(1) :154-156.
21. Jones, P. (2013). How to Gain Confidence to Speak English [online] available: http://www.ehow.com/how_8131189_gain-confidence-speak-english.html
22. Krashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and applications. New York, NY: Longman.
23. Land, G. (1983). A made-to-measure ESP course for banking staff. The ESP Journal, 2(2), 161–171. doi: 10.1016/0272-2380(93)90005-r
24. Lee, H.-K. (2009). A study of an ESP program for university engineering students. English Language Teaching, 21(3), 69–85. doi: 10.17936/pkelt.2009.21.3.004
25. Marjanovikj-Apostolovski, M. (2019). Developing teaching materials for ESP courses: The last option many ESP teachers resort to. SEEU Review, 14(1), 160–177. doi: 10.2478/seeur-2019-0009
26. Ministry of Education, 2019. The Guidelines on English language teaching and Learning Reforming Policy. Bangkok
27. Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2010). Language curriculum design. New York, NY: Routledge.
28. National Institute of Educational Testing Service (Public Organization). (2018). Summary O-NET Results in 2018. [Online] Available: http://www.newonetresult.niets.or.th/AnnouncementWeb/Login.aspx
29. Nazarova, T. (1996). English for specific purposes in Russia: a historical perspective. English for Specific Purposes – Russia, 1, 4–5.
30. Niamhom, W., Srisuantang S., & Tanpichai, P. (2018). Satisfaction study towards classroom language training courses of English teachers in primary educational service area office, Nakhon Pathom province, Thailand. Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2). doi: 10.26500/jarssh-03- 2018-0201
31. Noom-ura, S. (2013). English-teaching problems in Thailand and Thai teachers’ professional development needs. English Language Teaching, 6(11). Canadian Center of Science and Education (139–147).
32. Noopong, D. (2002). English teaching problems and the needs for professional development of teachers of English in education extended schools under the Jurisdiction of the Office of Primary Education, Nakhon Ratchasima. Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University. English Program.
33. Nunan, D. (1988). Syllabus design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology. Hemel Hempstead: Phoenix ELT.
35. Oliva, P. F. (1992). Developing the curriculum (3rd ed.). New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.
36. Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2018). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues. England: Pearson Education.
37. Pavel V. Sysoyev (2000). Developing an English for Specific Purposes Course Using a Learner Centered Approach: A Russian Experience. The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. VI, No. 3, March 2000. [Online] Available: http://iteslj.org/
38. Pongsitthakorn, P. (2012). Training curriculum development on standard-based learning unit design for Thai language teachers of the secondary education level. SDU Research Journal Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(2), 121–135.
39. Qing Xie. (2016). Developing communicative competence for the globalized workplace in English for occupational purposes course in China. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(6), 1142–1152, November 2016. [Online] Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0706.12
40. Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511667220
41. Robinson, P. C. (1980). English for specific purposes Esp ; the present position. Oxford, NY, Toronto, Sydney, Paris, Kronberg/Taunus: Pergamon Press.
42. Robinson, P. C. (1991). ESP today: A practitioner’s guide. London: Prentice Hall International.
43. Sabri T. S. Ahmed. (2018). Communicative competence in English as a Foreign Language: Its meaning and the pedagogical considerations for its development. The Creative Launcher: An International, Open Access, Peer Reviewed & Refereed E-Journal in English, II(VI), 301–311.
44. Simpson, J. (2011). Integrating project-based learning in an English language tourism classroom in a Thai university (Doctoral dissertation) Australian Catholic University,Sydney, Australia. https://doi.org/10.4226/66/5a961e4ec686
45. Strevens, P. (1978a). Special-purposes language learning. London: Pergamon.
46. Susilowati, E. (2008). ESP as an Approach Of English Language Teaching In Its. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora,
1(1). doi: 10.12962/j24433527.v1i1.680
47. Sysoyev, P. (1999). Principles of teaching English for Specific Purposes in Russia. English for Specific Purposes – Russia, 11, 13–15.
48. Ulla, M. B. (2018). English language teaching in Thailand: Filipino teachers’ experiences and perspectives. Issues in Educational Research, 28(4), 1080–1094. [Online] Available: http://www.iier.org.au/iier28/ulla2.pdf
49. Vorobieva N. (1996). Needs analysis for an international relations department. English for Specific Purposes – Russia, 2, 15–18.
50. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
51. Wanthong, N. (2018). Development of English Teaching curriculum through problem-based learning approach of Teachers in SANUK province cluster. College of Asian Scholar Journal. 8th Special Edition (October 2019), 193–201.
52. Wiriyachitra, A. (2002). English-language teaching and learning in Thailand in this decade. Thai TESOL Focus, 15(1), 4–9.
53. Woodrow, L. (2017). Needs analysis and ESP course design. Introducing Course Design in English for Specific Purposes, 21–31. doi: 10.4324/9781315143279-3
54. Yongjiranon, P. (2010). Needs analysis to develop an ESP course for recruitment consultants at Manpower (Thailand). Bangkok, Thailand: Language Institute, Thammasat University.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
