The Analysis of Broken Cap Brand Violation (Study of Decisions in Mahkamah Agung (Number 85 / Pk / Pdt.Sus-Haki / 2015)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/rdwx9129Keywords:
Intellectual Property Rights, Foreign Trademarks, Priority RightsAbstract
In the global environment, every company carries out economic activities such as producing a product that could be purchased by the public and accepted by the society. The intended strategy is in producing a product, the product is expected to have its own attraction, then the product must be given a Brand as a sign. The Trademark Case is the subject of this study, i.e. in the dispute over ownership of the "Cap Kaki Tiga" Brand, this mark was accused by Russell Vince, a Plaintiff in the Commercial Court, saying that Wen Ken Drug Co. was a company. Pte. Ltd, as the owner of the Brand Cap Kaki Tiga has imitated the symbol of the British country Isle of man. This thesis produce the formulation of the problem on how legal protection of Foreign Trademarks in Indonesia and the legal consequences for the Cap Kaki Tiga brand after the decision Number 85 / PK / PK / Pdt.Sus-HaKI / 2015. This thesis uses the normative juridical method. The author also obtained primary, secondary and tertiary data sources Including agreements between countries such as TRIPs agreements or agreements governing other trademarks. In protecting foreign brands in Indonesia, efforts that can be made are preventive and repressive efforts. The legal consequences after the verdict that is, causing Cap Kaki Tiga does not get legal protection for their brand in Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
