A Review on Indian Social Entrepreneurship

Authors

  • Bibhuti B Pradhan Department of Management Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/phmgbe30

Keywords:

Bottom of the pyramid, economic entrepreneurs, Social entrepreneurship, Social Innovation, s, Social needs, social entrepreneurs

Abstract

The idea of philanthropy has been considered to be somewhat fascinating. It provides the most appealing mix of social services and business. It's so special in nature. Entrepreneurship is typically tied to economic activity, wealth and social benefits or social stability are skilfully overlooked. Society changes have become more or less evident throughout the world in the present era of rapid industrialization and economic growth, including India with the concept of social entrepreneurship growing in India and around the world helping to represent the business more meaningfully than ever, and the spirit of entrepreneurship as it is lived. Social enterprise is not a modern term, but in recent times the idea has risen to new heights. Since Indian Government has made CSR more realistic than formality, companies are now looking for their bigger roles to help society in an economically as well as socially beneficial way. In the concept of social enterprise itself, the fine mix of capitalism and social benefits is explained. Recently, the term took new meanings and manifestations and was adopted in a broader range. This form of business was accepted by some prominent organizations in India and shaped society very positively. This is the aim of social enterprise, which is now more important than making income for society and its well-being. In the opinion of scholars, the proposal tackles also the social need and technological developments as a whole; social entrepreneurship simply considers social needs and solves them with a unique social invention. This is the differentiating between social and business enterprises, economic enterprise focuses on economic necessity, while social enterprise focuses on social needs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] S. V. Ramani, S. SadreGhazi, and S. Gupta, “Catalysing innovation for social impact: The role of social enterprises in the Indian sanitation sector,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 2017.

[2] N. M. F. Ahmed, “Women Entrepreneurship in India,” Int. J. Trend Sci. Res. Dev., 2017.

[3] P. Tiwari, A. K. Bhat, and J. Tikoria, “An empirical analysis of the factors affecting social entrepreneurial intentions,” J. Glob. Entrep. Res., 2017.

[4] M. Chand and M. Ghorbani, “National culture, networks and ethnic entrepreneurship: A comparison of the Indian and Chinese immigrants in the US,” Int. Bus. Rev., 2011.

[5] N. Baporikar, “Youth Entrepreneurship in Indian Scenario,” Int. J. Asian Bus. Inf. Manag., 2014.

[6] M. S. Satar and S. John, “A conceptual model of critical success factors for Indian social enterprises,” World J. Entrep. Manag. Sustain. Dev., 2016.

[7] P. Tiwari, A. K. Bhat, and J. Tikoria, “The role of emotional intelligence and self-efficacy on social entrepreneurial attitudes and social entrepreneurial intentions,” J. Soc. Entrep., 2017.

[8] “Youth Entrepreneurship as a Way of Boosting Indian Economic Competitiveness: A Study of Orissa,” Int. Rev. Manag. Mark., 2012.

[9] R. Oberoi, “Conceptualization of social entrepreneurship: Narratives on avant garde social entrepreneurs from India,” Dev. Corp. Gov. Responsib., 2016.

[10] P. Bhatt and A. J. Ahmad, “Financial social innovation to engage the economically marginalized: insights from an Indian case study,” Entrep. Reg. Dev., 2017.

[11] C. C. Williams and A. Gurtoo, “Evaluating competing theories of street entrepreneurship: Some lessons from a study of street vendors in Bangalore, India,” Int. Entrep. Manag. J., 2012.

[12] A. Agrawal and P. Kumar, Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Business Models: The Case of India. 2018.

Downloads

Published

08.11.2019

How to Cite

Pradhan, B. B. . (2019). A Review on Indian Social Entrepreneurship. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 23(6), 44-51. https://doi.org/10.61841/phmgbe30