Debates As One of the Most Effective form of Interactive English Language Learning for Medical Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/sqppq488Keywords:
Language, Teaching, Interactive Method,, Communicative Method,, DebatesAbstract
The article deals with peculiar type of interactive learning in the form of debates. The theoretical justification of this approach in the context of solving some specific educational objectives is observed. The potential of communicative approach in teaching medical universitystudents an English language is explored.
Downloads
References
[1] Newspaper «Narodnoyeslovo» (National word), 11.12.2012 г., № 240 (5630)
[2] Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 Motivational Self System. In Z. Dornyei, & E. Ushioda (Eds.) Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
[3] Isabelli-Garcia, C. (2002) Study abroad social networks, motivation, and attitudes: Implications for second language acquisition. In E. Churchill & M. DuFon (Eds.), Language learners in study abroad contexts (pp. 231-258). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters
[4] Fazli D (2003) Debate Method of Teaching at the University, Social.
[5] Bartlett, R.L.and Ferber, M.A. (1998), inBrownson, C. (2013) Classroom participation and knowledge gain. Journal of Education and Practice. 4(18), pp.78-83
[6] Rogers K.P. “Creativity as strengethingoneself” // Questions of psychology. – 1990. – №1. – С.164-168.
[7] Stanford's Online Strategy -Campus Technology
[8] Zare, P.and Othman, M. (2013) Classroom debate as a systematic teaching/learning approach. World Applied Sciences Journal. 28(11), pp.1506-13
[9] The Communicative Approach to Language Teaching / Ed. by Ch. Brumfit and K. Johnson. – Oxford :
Oxford Univ. Press, 1991. – 243 p
[10] Michael D. Evans, Ph.D. Social Education 57(7), 1993, pp. 370
[11] Frijters, S., Dam, G. and Rijlaarsdam, G. (2006) Effects of dialogic learning on value-loaded critical thinking. Learning and Instruction. 18(-), pp.66-82.
[12] Hadavi TM (2004), Green Time, Tehran: Khane Kherad Publication
[13] Kennedy, R. (2007) Inclass debates: Fertile ground for active learning and the cultivation of critical thinking and oral communication skills. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 19(2), pp.183-90.
[14] Spolsky, B (1989). Conditions for Second Language Learners. Oxford: Oxford University Press
[15] Gardner, R.C. (1985), Social Psychology and Second Language Learning: The role of attitudes and motivation, London:
[16] Wang, C. M. (1989). Chinese Students‟ Learning Patterns of Foreign Languages. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 4.
[17] Snyder, K.D. (2003), in Brownson, C. (2013) Classroom participation and knowledge gain. Journal of Education and Practice. 4(18), pp.78-83.
[18] National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project (1999). Standards for foreign language learning in the 21st century
[19] Soraya SM (2005) Debates Procedure, Tehran: growth Publications.
[20] Phajoohande MH (2001) Education Efficient in Islamic Culture, Journal of Philosophy and Mysticism No. 29, August and September.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
