Biological Metaphysical Scientism in Addressing the Issue of Altruism and Egoism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/acagem75Keywords:
Metaphysical Scientism, Altruism, Egoism, Sociobiology, Evolutionary Ethics, EthologyAbstract
The relevance of the study is predetermined by the problematization of knowledge about a human in modern philosophic and scientific discourse, a crisis in understanding the morality and moral being of a human, a deficit of altruism, and growing egoism in society. We need to comprehend modern approaches to the study of these ethical aspects, since, on the one hand, there is a contradictory and ambiguous view of altruism and egoism in humanitarian knowledge, and, on the other hand, some apology of naturalism when rapidly developing biological sciences are sure that they can explain this problem. Therefore, this paper aims at studying altruism and egoism and their functional peculiarities in nature and culture from the perspective of <> metaphysical scientism. The leading method of study is a dialectic method. It enables the discovery of the specifics of a new form of scientism, which implies that science (biology) takes the functions of philosophy (metaphysics) and tries to address the issue of altruism and egoism in nature and human activity independently. The novelty of this paper is a critical analysis of important biological concepts and approaches to the explanation of altruism and egoism. We have proved that their conceptualization in a biological discourse is, in fact, a methodological and worldview expansion of biology, which can be qualified as a biological form of metaphysical scientism and denoted by the term “biocracy.” We have revealed two types of such scientism: traditional, where nature is a subject that exceeds a human in its power and wisdom, and innovative, where nature is an object that can be technically modernized up to biotechnological modernization of morality (“ethical eugenics”). We have shown that sociobiology is a kind of reverse toward traditional biological scientism. It implicitly expresses a concern for the modern scale of innovative transformations of human nature and argues that since altruism performs a function of species protection in the animal world, it has the functions of human protection and culture protection in human society. The materials of the paper are of practical and theoretical value for the research of modern tendencies in the development of natural scientific and humanitarian knowledge of altruism and egoism. They enlarge the field of reflection on the bases and methodological peculiarities of scientific and cognitive practices and new forms of culture scientification.
Downloads
References
[1] Apresyan R.G. Egoism Electronic resource Electronic of the RAS Institute of Philosophy New Philosophic Encyclopedia // URL: http://iphras.ru/elib/3495.html (accessed date April 27, 2017).
[2] Grudinkin А. Za Muraveinikom – Cheloveinik, A Human Anthill. Znanie – Sila. 2014. No. 6. Pp. 94-101.
[3] Gusseinov A.A. Ethics and Moral in Modern World. Ethical Thought: Modern Research. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya, 2009. P. 5-18.
[4] Denisov S.F. Scientism in Metaphysics: Monograph. Omsk. Publishing House of Omsk State Pedagogical University. 2011. 298 p.
[5] Dockins R. Electronic resource Ethology. Ru. Access mode: URL: http://ethology.ru/library/?id=56 (access
date December 23, 2016).
[6] Zinchenko V. Electronic resource Psychologies. Access mode: URL: http://www.psychologies.ru/selfknowledge/behavior/vladimir-zinchenko-dobrota-suschestvuet-radi-sebya-samoy/ (access date April
27, 2017).
[7] Ilyin E.I. Psychology of Aid. Altruism. Empathy. St. Petersburg. Piter, 2013. 304 p.
[8] Kant, I., Anthropology from the Pragmatic Viewpoint. Kant, I. Collected Works: in 6 v. V. 6. Moscow. Myself,
1966. Pp. 349-587.
[9] Karpinskaya R. S., Nikolskiy S. S.A. Sociobiology: A Critical Analysis. Moscow. Mysl, 1988. 203 p.
[10] Krasikov V.I. V Ekstrime. Interdisciplinary Philosophic Study of the Reasons, Forms and Patterns of
Radical Consciousness. Moscow, 2006. 506 p.
[11] Krasikov V.I. Scientific and Philosophic Hybrids: Scientification of Philosophy in the XIX-XX Centuries.
Bulletin of Kuzbass State Technical University. 2013. No. 1. P. 159-162.
[12] Kutyrev V.A. Apology of Human: Prerequisites and Contours of Conservative Philosophy. Collection of
articles. Moscow. Berlin. Direkt-Media, 2015. 316 p. Pp. 64-93.
[13] Lamsden Ch. J., Wilson E.O. Prometheus's Fire: A Fragment from the Book. Ethical Thought 1001. Moscow.
Republik, 1992. 446 p. Pp. 325-341.
[14] Lorenz K. The Other Side of the Mirror. Moscow: Respublika, 1998. 493 p. Pp. 243-488.
[15] Markov, A. Human Evolution. In 2 books. Book 2 Obeziyany, Neirony i Dusha [Monkeys, Neurons and
Soul]. Moscow. AST: CORPUS, 2013. 512 p.
[16] Moiseev N.N. A Human and Noosphere. Moscow: Molodaya Gvardiya, 1990. 351 p.
[17] Nikolskiy S. А. Is Sociobiology a Biosociology of a Human?. Access mode URL:
http://ethology.ru/library/?id=166 (accessed date April 27, 2017)
[18] Palmer J., Palmer L. Evolutionary Psychology. Secrets of Homo Sapiens Behavior. St. Petersburg, PraimEvroznak. Moscow, OLMA-PRESS, 2003. 383 p.
[19] Petrenko V. F. Basic Metaphors of Psychological Theories. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 14.
Psychology. 2013. No 1. Pp. 4-23.;
[20] Petrenko V. F. Basic Metaphors of Psychological Theories. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 14.
Psychology. 2013. No. 1. Pp. 4-23.
[21] Pecchei А. Human Qualities. Moscow. Progress, 1980. 302 p.
[22] Ruse, M. Evolutionary Ethics: Healthy Perspective or Final Decrepitude? Voprosy Filosofii. 1992. No. 3. Pp.
34-52.
[23] Ruse M., Wilson E. Darwinism and Ethics. Voprosy Filosofii. 1987. No. 1. Pp. 94-108.
[24] Rand А. Добродетель эгоизма = The Virtue of Selfishness: A New Concept of Egoism. Alpina Publisher.
Moscow, 2011. 185 p.
[25] Rand A. Answers: About Ethics, Art, Policy, and Economy. Alpina Publisher. Moscow, 2012. 282 p.
[26] Simon G. What is Altruism? V Mire Nauki. 1991. No. 5. P. 59.
[27] Satdinova N.Kh. Sociobiology - Pro and Contra. Voprosy Filosofii. 1982. No. 3. Pp. 129-136.
[28] Sekatskaya M.A. Moral Responsibility without Freedom of Will. Argument for naturalist ethics. Voprosy
Filosofii. 2014. No. 10. Pp. 151-161.
[29] Skulachev V.P. Phenoptosis or Programmed Death of Organism. Access mode: URL:
[30] Smith N. Modern systems of psychology. St. Petersburg. Prime-Euroznak. 2003. 384 p.
[31] Smith, R. A. A human between biology and culture. Chelovek. 2000. No. 1. 25-36.
[32] Tischenko P.D., Yudin B.G. Heyday of Philosophy. Voprosy Filosofii. 2015. No. 12. Pp. 198-203.
[33] Wilson E. Masters of the Earth. Social Conquest of the Planet by Humanity. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2014. 352 p.
[34] Wilson E.O. Sense of Human Existence [Electronic resource Postnauka.ru] – Access mode: URL:
https://postnauka.ru/longreads/48108 (access date December 23, 2016).
[35] Chernigovskaya T.G. Human in a Human: Consciousness and Neuron Network. Consciousness in Philosophy and Science. The RAS Institute of Philosophy, 2008, Pp. 325-360
[36] Egin D. Proschai, Farewell to the Egoistic Gene!. Electronic resource Этология. ру // access mode URL:
http://ethology.ru/library/?id=301,%202007 (accessed date April 27, 2017)
[37] Yakimova E.V., Meloni M. Moralization of Biology: Pluses and Minuses of a Gracious Look on Nature. Social and humanitarian sciences. Russian and foreign literature. Series 11: Sociology. Reference journal. 2014. No. 3. Pp. 100-109.
[38] Yakimova Е. V. Phenomenon of Altruism: New Aspects and Modern Analytical Tendencies. Sociological Annual: Collection of scientific works. Moscow, 2013. 362 p. Pp. 241-266.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
