The Impacts of Selecting Various Industrial Competitors on the Risk Level of Viet Nam Hardware Industry during and After the Global Crisis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/pn8d8z33Keywords:
Risk Management, Competitive Firm Size, Market Risk, Asset and Equity Beta, Hardware IndustryAbstract
Using a one-factor model, this paperwork estimates the impacts of the size of firms’ competitors in the hardware industry on the market risk level, measured by equity and asset beta, of 22 listed companies in this category. This study identified that the risk dispersion level in this sample study could be minimized in case the competitor size doubles (measured by equity beta var of 0.678). Besides, the empirical research findings show us that the asset beta min value decreases from 0.054 to 0.030 when the size of the competitor doubles. Last but not least, most of the beta values are acceptable. Ultimately, this paper illustrates calculated results that might give proper recommendations to relevant governments and institutions in re-evaluating their policies during and after the financial crisis of 2007-2011.
Downloads
References
[1] Chen RR, Chidambaran NK, Imerman MB, Sopranzetti BJ. (2013). Liquidity, Leverage, and Lehman: A Structural Analysis of Financial Institutions in Crisis. Fordham School of Business Research Paper No. 2279686.
[2] Dexheimer, John, & Haugen, Carla. (2003). Sarbanes-Oxley: Its Impact on the Venture Capital Community, Minnesota Journal of Business Law and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 2(1).
[3] Eugene, Fama F., and French, Kenneth R. (2004). The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Economic Perspectives.
[4] Flifel, Kaouther. (2012). Financial Markets between Efficiency and Persistence: Empirical Evidence on Daily Data. Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 379-400
[5] Gunaratha V. (2013). The Degree of Financial Leverage as a Determinant of Financial Risk: An Empirical Study of the Colombo Stock Exchange in Sri Lanka. 2nd International Conference on Management and Economics Paper.
[6] Huy DTN. (2013). Estimating Beta of Viet Nam Listed Public Utilities, Natural Gas, and Oil Company Groups During and After the Financial Crisis of 2007-2011. Economic and Business Review, (15)1 : 57-71
[7] Litvak, Kate. (2008). Defensive Management: Does the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Discourage Corporate Risk-Taking?, Law and Economics Research Paper, No. 108.
[8] Ling, Amy. (2013), Tax Issues Relating to Intangibles, Asia-Pacific Tax Bulletin.
[9] Mamun MAA. (2013). Performance Evaluation of Prime Bank Limited in Terms of Capital Adequacy. Global Journal of Management and Business Research. (13)9: 26-29.
[10] Ovat OO. (2013). Liquidity Constraints and Entrepreneurial Financing in Nigeria: The Fate of Fresh Graduate Entrepreneurs. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, (13)9: 49-57.
[11] XiYing Zhang, Ivy. (2007). Economic consequences of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44 (2007) 74–115
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.