Attribution Model of Composition in Modern Chinese (On the Example of Medical Terms)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/3byajm70Keywords:
Collocation, Copulative Model,, Attributive Model,, Term, Compound Word.Abstract
This articleanalyses the two-syllabic medical terms of the modern Chinese language, formed by the attributive model of compounding. This model within the framework of this lexico-semantic group has not been the subject of a special study yet. Thus, the linguistic units formed by this model were the material for solving the problem of systematizing ideas about speech formation. Terms are special concepts. Their specificity is based on the fact that, first of all, they do not lose their integrity, no matter how their content is transmitted. Regardless of whether the terms are monosyllabic words or polysyllabic phrases, they always represent one sign to which one concept corresponds. The main difference between the term and the common word is the specialized meaning of the term. Terms are commonly used in special areas of communication to mean expressing special concepts. Word- formation models are within the framework of the leading method of word-formation-compounding in the Chinese language. The medical terminology of modern Chinese is a kind of terminology. As you know, between the concepts of “word” and “term” there are certain lexical differences. Compound words - a product of collocation and lexicalization of phrases, consist entirely of root (significant) morphemes. The most productive class of compound words is two-syllable words consisting of two-root (significant) morphemes that are in certain relations. In medical terminology of modern Chinese language attribution model of compounding is the most effective. With the subordinate connection of the attributive model between the parts of a compound word, one part is subordinate to the other, and both parts, therefore, are in different semantic dependence. Subjunctive addition is a combination of morphemes, unequal in semantic and functionally syntactic relations. Most of the terms formed by the attributive model of word formation are noun terms, collocation terms, and borrowing terms.
Downloads
References
Bartoshevich A.K. To define the system of word formation / / The problems of linguistics. - 1972. - № 2. - 83-90.
[2]. Vinogradov V.V. Russian language ( Grammatical learning of word ) : Textbook for universities / The main editor G.A.Zolotova. – the 3rd edition, correct – M.: High school, 1986. – 640 c.
[3]. Vinokur G.O. Russian word formation’s notes / / The chosen works of Russian language. – 1959. [4]. Golovin B.N. The remarks to theory of word formation. – Gorkiy, 1967, 78th edition.
[5]. Kovalik I.I. Learning about word formation, 2nd edition, publ. of Lvov university, 1961. [6]. Kubryakova E. What is the word formation. – M.: Science, 1965. – 78 c.
[7]. Pokrovskiy M. M. The chosen works of linguistics, M., 1959.
[8]. Saxarnyy L.V. The word formation as a syntactic process / / The problems of the structures of word and sentence. – Perm’: publ., 1974. 3-30.
[9]. Yantsenetskaya M.N. The semantic problems of theory of word formation. – Tomsk: Tomsk university’s
publ., 1979. – 242 c.
[10]. Korotkov I.N. The main features of morphological structure of Chinese (Grammatical character of word). – M.: Science, 1968. – 400 c.
[11]. Xamatova A.A. The word formation of the modern Chinese. M., “Muravey”, 2003. – 224 p.
[12]. Shutova E.I. The composing of important monosyllabuses as grammatical way of modern Chinese/ / Questions of linguistics. - 1997. - № 1. - 58-72
[13]. Semenas A.L Lexicology of Chinese language 2000. - 320 с.
[14]. Shutova E.I. The composing of important monosyllabuses as grammatical way of modern Chinese/ / Questions of linguistics. - 1997. - № 1. - 58-72
[15]. Karapetyanch A.M Typology of main standart of Chinese language 10. 02. 19. - М. , 1992. - 324 p.
[16]. Kotelova N.Z Question about term of specificity – Linguistic problems of science-technic terminology 1970, p.124.
[17]. Ivanov V.V terminology and borrowing from “СКЯ”. М., Science, 1973 y., p. 118 [18]. Florov O.P Word-formation in vocabulary terminology, 1981 y., p.6
[19]. Gorelov V.I Lexicology of Chinese language, 1984 y., p. 31 [20]. Chinese-russian vocabulary, 1986 y.
[21]. Xamatova A.A. The word formation of the modern Chinese. M., “Muravey”, 2003. – 224 p. [22]. http://www.wanfangdata.comProfessional orientalist forum.
[23]. http://www.wanfangdata.comProfessional orientalist forum. [24]. Given terms we were conditionally denoted as numerals
[25]. Xamatova A.A. The word formation of the modern Chinese. M., “Muravey”, 2003. – 90 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
