Smart Battery Management Systems for Optimizing Electric Vehicle Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/n7x6mz37Keywords:
Electric Vehicles (EVs), Battery Management Systems (BMS), Smart BMS, OptimizationAbstract
The proliferation of electric vehicles (EVs) has sparked a growing interest in optimizing their performance and extending their driving range while ensuring battery longevity. This research paper delves into the critical role of Smart Battery Management Systems (BMS) in achieving these objectives. Traditional BMS systems are limited in their ability to adapt to real-time conditions, leaving room for performance improvements. Smart BMS, which integrates advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, and the Internet of Things (IoT), has the potential to revolutionize the way we manage EV batteries. By continuously monitoring and controlling critical parameters like voltage, current, temperature, and state of charge (SoC), smart BMS enables precise battery management, thermal control, and state estimation. This, in turn, leads to optimized EV performance, extended battery life, and improved safety. Through a comprehensive review of existing literature, detailed analysis, and empirical evidence, this paper explores the advantages of smart BMS in enhancing EV performance and addresses the challenges and considerations associated with its implementation. It provides insights into practical implications, showcases real-world examples of EVs equipped with smart BMS, and underscores the significance of smart BMS technology in shaping the future of electric mobility. In a rapidly evolving automotive landscape, the findings of this study offer valuable guidance to industry stakeholders, researchers, and policymakers. The paper concludes with a call for further research and the widespread adoption of smart BMS to promote the sustainable development of electric vehicles, ultimately reducing our carbon footprint and advancing the adoption of clean and efficient transportation.
Downloads
References
1. C. Zhang, F. Yang, X. Ke, Z. Liu, and C. Yuan, “Predictive modeling of energy consumption and greenhouse gas
emissions from autonomous electric vehicle operations,” Applied Energy, vol. 254, p. 113597, Nov. 2019, doi:
10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113597.
2. F. Yang, Y. Xie, Y. Deng, and C. Yuan, “Predictive modeling of battery degradation and greenhouse gas emissions
from U.S. state-level electric vehicle operation,” Nature Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, Jun. 2018, doi:
10.1038/s41467-018-04826-0.
3. T. Stephens, J. Sullivan, and G. Keoleian, “A Microsimulation of Energy Demand and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
from Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Use,” World Electric Vehicle Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 789–799, Sep. 2012,
doi: 10.3390/wevj5030789.
4. L. J. Aaldering, J. Leker, and C. H. Song, “Analysis of technological knowledge stock and prediction of its future
development potential: The case of lithium-ion batteries,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 223, pp. 301–311,
Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.174. Stephan, C. R. Bening, T. S. Schmidt, M. Schwarz, and V. H.
Hoffmann, “The role of inter-sectoral knowledge spillovers in technological innovations: The case of lithium-ion
batteries,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 148, p. 119718, Nov. 2019, doi:
10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119718.
5. K. Shukla, M. Janmaijaya, A. Abraham, and P. K. Muhuri, “Engineering applications of artificial intelligence: A
bibliometric analysis of 30 years (1988–2018),” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 85, pp. 517–
532, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2019.06.010.
6. P. K. Muhuri, A. K. Shukla, and A. Abraham, “Industry 4.0: A bibliometric analysis and detailed overview,”
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 78, pp. 218–235, Feb. 2019, doi:
10.1016/j.engappai.2018.11.007.
7. M. A. Hannan, M. S. H. Lipu, A. Hussain, and A. Mohamed, “A review of lithium-ion battery state of charge
estimation and management system in electric vehicle applications: Challenges and recommendations,” Renewable
and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 78, pp. 834–854, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.001.
8. M. U. Ali, A. Zafar, S. H. Nengroo, S. Hussain, M. J. Alvi, and H.-J. Kim, “Towards a Smarter Battery Management
System for Electric Vehicle Applications: A Critical Review of Lithium-Ion Battery State of Charge Estimation,”
Energies, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 446, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.3390/en12030446.
9. W. Wang and J. Mu, “State of Charge Estimation for Lithium-Ion Battery in Electric Vehicle Based on Kalman Filter
Considering Model Error,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 29223–29235, 2019, doi: 10.1109/access.2019.2895377.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
