FMEA Approach of Lean Sig Sigma Implementation: Estimating the Value of COPQ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/jp567861Keywords:
Lean, Sig Sigma, COPQ, FMEAAbstract
Lean and Six Sigma are comprehensive concepts in business systems. The strength of this concept is that it is able to provide tangible results for the company, so it requires implementation and measurable evaluation steps. The implementation step of Lean Six Sigma must use two approaches: a lean approach to eliminate waste processes and reduce variations in products. This article discusses the changes resulting from the implementation of Lean Six Sigma because there are differences in the cost of quality between the conditions before and after the implementation. Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ) is the cost due to defects in processes, products, and services. COPQ is defined as the costs that must be incurred to resolve failures and damage in the process. The measurement method used to estimate the value of CPOQ requires initial measurements. The constraint faced in this estimation was that there was no measure available at the start of the project. To overcome these limitations, we use a weighted risk approach based on potential failures to calculate the costs of the ongoing process. Furthermore, the paper also presents the steps in Lean Six Sigma. In addition, the evaluation mechanism uses Lean Six Sigma with the FMEA approach to COPQ.
Downloads
References
Aboelmaged, M. G. (2010). Six Sigma quality: a structured review and implications for future research.
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 27(3), 268-317.
https://doi.org/10.1108/02656711011023294
Antony, J., Snee, R., & Hoerl, R. (2017). Lean Six Sigma: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. International Journal of
Quality & Reliability Management, 34(7), 34(7),1073-1093. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-03-2016-0035
Ben-Daya, M. (2009). Failure Mode and Effect Analysis. In: Ben-Daya M., Duffuaa S., Raouf A., Knezevic J., AitKadi D. (eds) Handbook of Maintenance Management and Engineering. London: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-472-0_4
Brue, G. (2002). Six Sigma for Managers. Jakarta: Canary.
Čiarnienė, R., & Vienažindienė, M. (2012). Lean Manufacturing: Theory and Practice. Economics and Management,
17(2), 726-732. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.em.17.2.2205
Dutta, S., & Jaipuria, S. (2020). Reducing packaging material defects in beverage production line using Six Sigma
methodology. International Journal of Sig Sigma and Competitive Advantage, 12(1), 59-82.
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCA.2020.107477
Edgeman, R., & Bigio, D. (2004). Sig Sigma as Metaphor: Heresy or Holy Writ?. Quality Progress, 37(1), 25-30.
Ghaleb, A. A., El-Sharief, M. A., & El-Sebaie, M. G. (2014). Study of Tools, Techniques and Factors used in Lean
Sig Sigma. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 5(12), 1652-1658.
Ganguly, K. (2012). Improvement process for rolling mill through the DMAIC Six Sigma approach. International
Journal for Quality Research, 6(3), 221-231.
Gaspersz, V. (2002). Total Quality Management. Jakarta: Gramedia.
George, M. L. (2002). Lean Six Sigma: Combining Six Sigma Quality with Lean Speed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ghobadian, A., Speller, S., & Jones, M. (1994). Service Quality: Concepts and Models. International Journal of
Quality & Reliability Management, 11(9), 43-66. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656719410074297
Giakatis, G., Enkawa, T., & Washitani, K. (2001). Hidden quality costs and the distinction between quality cost and
quality loss. Total Quality Management, 12(2), 179-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09544120120011406
Harry, M., & Schroeder, R. (2000). Six Sigma: The Breakthrough Management Strategy Revolutionizing the World’s
Top Corporations. New York: Doubleday.
Hill, J., Thomas, A. J., Mason-Jones, R. K., & El-Kateb, S. (2018). The implementation of a Lean Six Sigma
framework to enhance operational performance in an MRO facility. Production & Manufacturing Research,
6(1), 26-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2017.1417179
Hammer, M., & Goding, J. (2001). Putting Sig Sigma in perspective. Quality, 40(10), 58–62.
Holden, R. J. (2011). Lean Thinking in Emergency Departments: A Critical Review. Annals of Emergency Medicine,
57(3), 265-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.08.001
Kusnadi, A., & Yudoko, K. (2016). Contractor Work Preparation Process Improvement Using Lean Six Sigma. The
South East Asian Journal of Management, 10(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.21002/seam.v10i1.5781
Krishnan, S. K. (2006). Increasing the visibility of hidden failure costs. Measuring Business Excellence, 10(4), 77-
101. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040610719290
Moen, R. M. (1998). A new quality cost model is used as a top management tool. The TQM Magazine, 10(5), 334-341.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09544789810231216
Montgomery, D. C., & Woodall, W. H. (2008). An Overview of Six Sigma. International Statistical Review, 76(3),
329-346.
Pande, P. S., Neuman, R. P., & Cavanagh, R. R. (2000). The Six Sigma way. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Petrusch, A., & Vaccaro, G. L. (2019). Attributes valued by students in higher education services: a lean perspective.
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 19(4), 862-882. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-07-2018-0062
Prashar, A. (2014). Adoption of Six Sigma DMAIC to reduce the cost of poor quality. International Journal of
Productivity and Performance Management, 63(1), 103-126. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2013-0018
Rahman, A., Shaju, S. U., Sarkar, S. K., et al. (2017). A Case Study of Sig Sigma Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control (DMAIC) Methodology in the Garment Sector. Independent Journal of Management &
Production, 8(4), 1309-1323. https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v8i4.650
Raisinghani, M. S., Ette, H., Pierce, R., et al. (2005). Six Sigma: concepts, tools, and applications. Industrial
Management & Data Systems, 105(4), 491-505. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570510592389
Ridwan, A., & Noche, B. (2014). Analyzing Process Capability Indices (PCI) and Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ) to
Improve Performance of Supply Chain in Port. The Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL).
Hamburg, Germany.
Schneider, H. (1996). Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA From Theory to Execution. Technometrics, 38(1),
80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1996.10484424
Schroedera, R. G., Lindermana, K., Liedtkeb, C., & Choo, A. S. (2008). Journal of Operations Management, 26(4),
536-554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.06.007
Snee, R. (2004). Six Sigma: The evolution of 100 years of business improvement methodology. International
Journal of Sig Sigma and Competitive Advantage, 1(1), 1-20. https://10.1504/IJSSCA.2004.005274
Sörqvist, L. (1997). EFFECTIVE METHODS for measuring the cost of poor quality. Measuring Business
Excellence, 1(2), 50-53. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb025484
Troy, K., & Schein, L. (1995). The quality culture: manufacturing versus services. Managing Service Quality: An
International Journal, 5(3), 45-47. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604529510796403
Wang, Z., You, J., Liu, H., & Wu, S. (2017). Failure Mode and Effect Analysis using Soft Set Theory and COPRAS
Method. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 10(1), 1002–1015.
https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.2017.10.1.67
Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (2005). Lean consumption. Harvard Business Review, 83(3), 58–68.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
