Ethics in Finance, Financial Globalization and Stakeholder Responsibility: New Concept of Corporate Finance

Authors

  • Abshor Marantika STIE Bangkinang, Riau, Indonesia Author
  • Harishchandra Singh Rathod Professor, Shri Jairambhai Patel Institute of Business Management, Gandhinagar, India Author
  • Rahul Chauhan Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Parul Institute of Business Administration, Parul University, Baroda, India. Author
  • Librina Tria Putri STIE Bangkinang, Riau, Indonesia Author
  • Andino Maseleno Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Malaysia. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/n37an695

Keywords:

Descriptive, Ethics in Finance, Financial Theories, Corporate Finance, Internationalization, Stakeholder.

Abstract

This article deals with the foundation of financial theory into corporate finance. Using analysis and synthesis scientific methods, and especially with the requirements for the successful application of these methods, in this article is not only review the financial literature but also it is shown the future approach of the expected financial paradigm. The aim of the paper is to describe and review financial theories in terms of classical, modern and actual approach; but also it is described the future approach of corporate finance in terms of financial function to establish the evolution and the cultural situation that affects the financial theories. This financial paradigm integrates ethics in finance, financial globalization, ICTs and stakeholder responsibility. The main result of this paper shows that it is necessary to take into consideration into financial paradigm aspects relate to the ethics, and concern to broad stakeholders interests to improve the efficiency of corporate finance that carry out the common good of the society. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Amram, M. and N. Kulatilaka. 2000. Opciones reales. Barcelona: Gestión 2000.

[2] Anbalagan, C. 2011. “Impact of International Business Ethics, Economic Systems and Intellectual Property

Rights in Business and Management”, International Journal of Marketingand Management Research 2(1),

pp. 57-75.

[3] Argandoña, A. 1996. Una nota sobre las relaciones entre ética, economía y finanzas. Barcelona: IESE.

[4] Asher, C.C., Mahoney, J.M. and J.T. Mahoney. 2005. “Towards a property rights foundation for a

stakeholder theory of the firm”, Journal of Management and Governance 9, pp. 5-32.

[5] Azofra, V. 2005. “Acerca de una nota crítica sobre la investigación actual en finanzas”, Cuadernos de

Economía y Dirección de la Empresa 24, pp. 121-150.

[6] Badawy, M. 2009. “A new paradigm for understanding management technology: a research agenda for

technocologists”, International Journal of Technology Management, 12 (5/6), pp. 717-732.

[7] Beim, D. 2001. What Triggers a Systemic Banking Crisis?. Columbia: Columbia Business Press.

[8] Berger, A. and L. Black. 2011. “Bank size, lending technologies, and small business finance”, Journal of

Banking and Finance 35 (3), pp. 724-735.

[9] Black, F. and M. Scholes. 1973. “The pricing of options and corporate liabilities”, Journal of Political

Economy 81 (3), pp. 637-654.

[10] Boatright, J. 2010. Finance Ethics: Critical Issues in Theory and Practice. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons

Ltd.

[11] Brealey, R., Myers, S. and F. Allen. 2006. Principles of corporate finance (8th ed.). New York: McGrawHill.

[12] Brealey, R., Myers, S. and F. Allen. 2007. Fundamentals of Corporate Finance (5th ed.). New York:

McGraw-Hill International.

[13] Brennan, M. 1995. “Corporate Finance over the past 25 years”, Financial Management, 24 (2), 9-22.

[14] Brynjolfsson, E., and L. Hitt. 2000. “Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational

transformation and business performance”, Journal of Economic Perspective 14

[15] (4), pp. 23-48.

[16] Caprio, G., and D. Klingebiel. 1997. Bank Insolvency: Bad Luck, Bad Policy, or Bad Banking? In I. M.

(eds.), Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics (págs. 79-104). Washington: World

Bank.

[17] Carra, C. A. and C. Tomkins. 1998. “Context, Culture and the Role of the Finance Function in Strategic

Decisions. A Comparative Analysis of Britain Germany, the U.S.A. and Japan”, Management Accounting

Research 9 (2), pp. 213-239.

[18] Chari, A. and P. Henry. 2004. “Risk Sharing and Asset Prices: Evidence from a Natural Experiment”,

Journal of Finance 59 (3), pp. 1295-1324.

[19] Cuervo, A. 1971. “Consideraciones sobre algunos aspectos de la moderna función empresarial”, Revista de

Economía Política 57, pp. 250-261.

[20] Detragiache, E. and G. Ho. 2010. Responding to Banking Crises: Lessons from Cross Country Evidence.

IMF Working Paper: IMF Institute.

[21] Dewing, A. 1914. Corporate promotions and reorganizations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

[22] Deyoung, R. 2001. “The fi nancial performance of pure play Internet banks”, Economic Perspectives 25 (1),

pp. 60–76.

[23] Dobson, J. 1997. “Ethics in Finance II”, Financial Analysts Journal 53 (1), pp. 15-25.

[24] Eije, H. and W. Westerman. 2002. “Multinational cash management and conglomerate discounts in the euro zone”, International Business Review 11 (4), pp. 1–25.

[25] Errunza, V. 2001. “Foreign Portfolio Equity Investments, Financial Liberalization, and Economic

Development”, Review of International Economics 9 (4), pp. 703-726.

[26] Fama, E. F. 1970. “Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work”, Journal of Finance

25 (2), pp. 383-417.

[27] Fanjul, G. and L. Valdunciel. 2009. “Impacto español de las nuevas tecnologías en el negocio bancario

español”, Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa 15 (1), pp. 81-93.

[28] Fernandez, J. 2004. Finanzas y ética: La dimensión moral de la actividad financiera y elgobierno

corporativo. Madrid: Universidad Pontifica de Comillas.

[29] Flórez, L. S. 2008. “Evolución de la Teoría Financiera en el Siglo XX”, Ecos de Economía (27), pp. 145-

168.

[30] Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman: Boston, 2nd edition, 2010.

[31] Gerstenberg, C. 1924. Financial organization and management of business. New York: Prentice-Hall.

Downloads

Published

29.02.2020

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 1 (2020): 24 (1) 2020

Section

Articles

License

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

How to Cite

Marantika, A., Singh Rathod, H., Chauhan, R., Tria Putri, L., & Maseleno, A. (2020). Ethics in Finance, Financial Globalization and Stakeholder Responsibility: New Concept of Corporate Finance. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(1), 1556-1563. https://doi.org/10.61841/n37an695