Importance of the Using Phraseological Units of the Concept “Faith” and “Religion” in Foreign Languages Teaching
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/d7njhe86Keywords:
phraseological units, concept, fate, religion, English, Turkish, TatarAbstract
Concepts, constantly developing and modifying with the help of various linguistic means, cannot be fully expressed in speech; therefore, the search for optimal verbal language means of expressing the concept continues. The set of concepts of a particular ethnic group makes up its conceptual sphere. Each individual concept will have its own concept sphere, which, in turn, can be one of the constituent elements of the general concept sphere of an individual and the whole nation. The categorization process, i.e., the formation of categories—extremely general concepts that are not subject to further generalization—does not have a generic concept. The emergence of such a scientific direction as conceptology, and the whole after it of comparative conceptology, in our opinion, contributed to the formation of linguoculturology as a theoretical discipline. The study of the indicated broad problems entailed the creation of a metalanguage of description and the development of a terminological apparatus. Phraseological units, as a kind of set of wisdom, quite clearly describe the way of life and history and national characteristics of people. This layer of vocabulary gives a complete picture of the linguistic picture of the world of the people being studied. In general, phraseological units are highly informative units of language, one of the language universals, since there are no languages without phraseological units. It is also necessary to note the importance of the internal form and connotation in the phraseological meaning, where emotionality, expressiveness, evaluativeness, intensity, and functional-stylistic characteristics are intertwined. All these reasons make the phraseological nomination much more complex than the lexical one. The results can be used both when studying intercultural processes and by culture experts, philologists, ethnologists, and other groups interactions and analyzing cultural and research issues and processes of the studying languages and in the process of teaching foreign languages.
Downloads
References
1. Galeeva, L.I., Sadykova, A.G., Kajumova, D.F., Valiullina, G.F. & Iakovleva, E.L. (2017). Social and
pedagogical conditions of formation the students culture of communication by means of socio-cultural
creativity.”. Man in India, 97(3), 53-65.
2. Galperin, I.R. (1981). Text as an object of linguistic research. Moscow: Nauka.
3. Great Encyclopedic Dictionary. (1991). Great encyclopedic dictionary. Moscow: VYUZSH MVD SSSR.
4. Likhachev, M.I. (1984). Ethics Dictionary. Moscow: Prosveschenie.
5. Mukhametzyanova, L.Y., Aleksandrova, N.S., Greek, A.D., Zatsepina, M.B., Prokopyev, A.I.,
Gaidamashko, I.V. (2018). Culture-oriented component scientific and methodical support of students’
humanitarian training in university. XLinguae, 11(1), 230-241.
6. Ordoğan Fehmi Türk atasözü. (1973). Ordoğan Fehmi Türk atasözü. İstanbul: Özyürek Yayınevi.
7. Pushkarev, V.V., Cherdymova, E.I., Prokopyev, A.I., Kochurov, M.G., Shamanin, N.V., Ezhov, S.G.,
Kamenskaya, S.V. & Kargina, N.V. (2019). Requirements for Green Restoration and Renovation of
Existing Buildings. Dilemas contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores, 41, 132-142.
8. Püsküllüoğlu, A. (1998). Türkçe deyimler sözlüğü. Istanbul: Arkadaş yayınevi.
9. Ryazapova, L.Z. & Anufriev, A.F. (2019). EcoArt Therapy as a Factor of Students’ Environmental
Consciousness Development. Ekoloji, 107, 687-693.
10. Tayebiniya, N.K., & Khorasgani, N.S. (2018). The relationship between workplace spirituality and job
performance among staff of Azad Islamic University, Iran. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 6(1),
14-18.
11. Tumasheva, D.G. (1977). Dialects of Siberian Tatars. Kazan: Publishing house of Kazan University.
12. Vinogradov, V.V. (1975). About the category of modality and modal words in the Russian language. Selected works. Studies on Russian grammar. Moscow: Science
13. Yusupova, A.Sh., Mugtasimova, G.R. & Nabiullina, G.A. (2015). Proverbs of the Tatar People as Part of Ethnic Identity. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(6), 161-16.
14. Zamaletdinov, R.R. (1999). Linguodidactic fundamentals of teaching Tatar reading to primary school students in Russian schools. Kazan: Master-lain.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
