Influence Openness to Experience, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Neuroticism on Performance with Self-Efficacy as Mediator

Authors

  • Nolla Puspita Dewi Faculty of Economics, University of Batam, Riau Islands, Indonesia Author
  • Bambang Satriawan Faculty of Economics, University of Batam, Riau Islands, Indonesia Author
  • Sri Yanti Faculty of Economics, University of Batam, Riau Islands, Indonesia Author
  • Ana Faizah Faculty of Economics, University of Batam, Riau Islands, Indonesia Author
  • Nurhatisyah Faculty of Economics, University of Batam, Riau Islands, Indonesia Author
  • Chablullah Wibisono Faculty of Economics, University of Batam, Riau Islands, Indonesia Author
  • Muamar Khaddafi Faculty of Economics, University of Batam, Riau Islands, Indonesia Author
  • Tohara Faculty of Economics, University of Batam, Riau Islands, Indonesia. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/a3jqcm18

Keywords:

Openness to Experience, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Neuroticism, Selfefficacy, Performance and SMEs

Abstract

Micro, small, and medium enterprises (SMEs) have a crucial role in the commercial growth of a country. Some researchers suggest that the inability of SMEs to improve competitiveness is caused by the SMEs that have various limitations, such as lack of ability to adapt to the environment, lack of agility in business opportunities, and lack of creativity and innovation in anticipation of a variety of environmental challenges in the industry. 4.0 revolution era. The population in this survey at the Department of Cooperatives and SMEs in Batam, the number of samples used in this study after calculation by the formula Slovin, is 150. The data were analyzed using a structural equation model. The software used for the structural analysis is AMOS and SPSS for descriptive studies. Research shows that: Extroversion on performance through self-efficacy had a significant effect, Agreeableness on performance through self-efficacy has a significant impact, Neuroticism on performance through self-efficacy has a significant effect. From the results of this study, it is suggested that the government support the findings of research outcome variables that will be done and SMEs prepare for the evolution of Indonesian SMEs towards digital marketing. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Alwi Hasan, e. a. (2001). Dictionary of Indonesia. Jakarta: Library.

[2] Ardi. V, A.E. (2017). Pengaruh Self Efficacy terhadap Employee Engagement dan Kinerja Karyawan

(Studi pada Karyawan PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Regional V Surabaya). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis

(JAB), 52(1), 163-172.

[3] Bandura. (1990). Multidimensional Scales of Perceived Academic Efficacy. Stanford: Stanford University.

[4] Chasanah. (2008). Analisis Pengaruh Empowerment, Self Efficacy, dan Budaya Organisasi terhadap

Kepuasan Kerja dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Karyawan (studi empiris pada karyawan PT. Mayora Tbk)

Regional Jateng dan DIY). Thesis.

[5] Daniel, J.C. (2005). Structural Interdependence, Personality, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior.

Emerald Group.

[6] Entrialgo M, F.E. (2000). Psychological Characteristic and Process: The Role of Entrepreneurship in

Spannish SMEs. European Journal of Management , 3 (3), 137-149.

[7] Feist, J., & F.G. (2010). Teori Kepribadian. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

[8] Friedman HS, S. M. (2006). Personality Theory of Classical and Modern Research: Third Edition. Jakarta:

Erlangga.

[9] Jawahar IM, C.D. (2007). Conscientiousness and Contextual Performance. Journal of Managerial

Psychology, 22(1), 330-349.

[10] John OP, D.E. (1991). The Big Five Inventory—Version 4a and 54. Berkeley: Institute of Personality and

Social Research, University of California.

[11] Lau VP, M.S. (1999). Career Success: The Effect of Personality. Career Development International , 4,

225-230.

[12] Lau, V.D. (1999). Career Success: The effects of Personality. Career Development International , 4, 225-

230.

[13] Luthans, F. & Peterson, S. (2002). Employee Engagement and Manager Self-Efficacy Implications for

Managerial Effectiveness and Development. Journal of Management Development, 21(5), 367-387.

[14] Luthan, F. (2010). Organizational Behavior. Singapore: Megraw Hill Book co.

[15] Mathis, J.R. (2010). Human Resource Management. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

[16] Nikolaou. (2003). Fitting the Person to the Organization. Journal of Managerial Psychology , 18 (7), 639-

648.

[17] Noviawati, D.R. (2016). Pengaruh Self Efficacy Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Dengan Motivasi Sebagai

Variabel Intervening (Studi Pada Karyawan Divisi Finance dan Divisi Human Resource PT. Cola-Cola)

Distribution Indonesia, Surabaya). Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 4(3), 32-44.

[18] Pepe, S.J. (2010). Work Self-Efficacy Scale and Search for Work Self-Efficacy Scale. Madrid: ISSN.

[19] Pillai, R. and Williams, E. (2004). Transformational leadership, self-efficacy, group cohesiveness,

commitment and performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17, 144-152.

[20] Purnomo, R. (2010). Pengaruh Personality, Self-efficacy and Locus of Control Terhadap Perception of

Business Performance: Small Scale and Medium. Journal of Business and Economics (JBE) , 17 (21), 144-

160.

[21] Rimper, R.R. (2014). Pengaruh Perencanaan Karir dan Self Efficacy Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan pada PT.

PLN (Persero) Area Manado. Journal EMBA.

[22] Robbins, S.P. (2003). Organizational Behavior. Jakarta: Index.

[23] Stephen, P.R. (1996). Perilaku Organisasi, konsep, Kontroversi dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: PT Bhuana Ilmu

Popular.

[24] Taormina RJ, K.M. (2007). Measuring Chinese Entrepreneurial Motivation: Personality and Environmental

Impact. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 13(4), 200-221.

Downloads

Published

31.05.2020

How to Cite

Puspita Dewi, N., Satriawan, B., Yanti, S., Faizah, A., Nurhatisyah, Wibisono, C., Khaddafi, M., & Tohara. (2020). Influence Openness to Experience, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Neuroticism on Performance with Self-Efficacy as Mediator. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(3), 1507-1516. https://doi.org/10.61841/a3jqcm18