AI IN AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES: SAFETY AND CHALLENGES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/qybzxe08Keywords:
Ai, vehicles, sensor, radar, safety, av, speed, roads, autopilot, brakesAbstract
Artificial intelligence in autonomous vehicles aims to ensure the safety of vehicles on public roads. An autonomous vehicle (AV) coordinates complex insight and limitation parts to make a model of its general surroundings, which is then used to explore the vehicle securely. AI (ML)-based models are unavoidably utilized in these parts to extricate objects in arrangement from uproarious sensor information. The prerequisites for these parts are essentially set to accomplish as much as could really be expected. With current AVs conveying numerous sensors (cameras, radars, and lidar), handling every one of the pieces of information in constant prompts engineers making compromises, which may bring about a less than ideal framework in specific driving circumstances. Because of the absence of exact necessities on individual components, secluded testing and approval additionally becomes challenging. In this paper, we plan the issue of determining stomach muscle extract world model precision required for safe AV conduct from high-level driving situation recreations. This is computationally costly as the world model can contain a large number of objects with a few credits, and an AV extricates a world model each time step during the reproduction. We depict ways to effectively address the issue and infer part-level necessities and tests.
Downloads
References
1. G. A. Lewis, s. Bellomo, and a. Galyardt, “Component mismatches are a critical bottleneck to fielding AI-enabled systems in the public sector,” 2019.
2. Ozkaya, “What is really different in engineering AI-enabled systems?” Ieee software, 2020.
3. W. Xu, “From automation to autonomy and autonomous vehicles: challenges and opportunities for human-computer interaction,” magazine, 2020.
4. Ullrich and M. Pfennigbauer, “Advances in lidar point cloud processing,” in Proceedings of the Laser Radar Technology and Applications International Society for Optics and Photonics, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, May 2019.
5. McGoldrick, v. Rabsatt, and m. Gerla, “Independent Active Aging: Role of 5G and Autonomous Vehicles, IEEE MMTC e-letter, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2015.
6. Chaudhary, “Reconfigurable computing for smart vehicles,” in Proceedings of the Smart Cities, Springer, Toulouse, October 2018.
7. J. London and d. Danks, “Regulating autonomous vehicles,” in proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACAM conference on AI, ethics, and society, New York, NY, USA, December 2018.
8. X. Zhao, k. Salako, l. Strigini, v. Robu, and d. Flynn, “assessing safety-critical systems from operational testing: a study on autonomous vehicles,” information and software technology, 2020. S. Ali,
9. Globalautoregs. 2020. Wp.1 agreement: 1968 Vienna Convention on Road Traffic.
10. Godoy, j.; pérez, j.; onieva, e.; villagrá, j.; milanés, v.; haber, r. 2015. A driverless vehicle demonstration on motorways and in urban environments, transport
11. Goodfellow, I.; Bengio, Y.; Courville, A. 2016. Deep learning. Mit press. 800 p. Grzywaczewski, a. 2017. Training AI for self-driving vehicles: the challenge of scale. Available from internet https://devblogs.nvidia.com/training-self- driving-vehicles-challenge-scale
12. Török, á.; Pauer, g. 2018. Optimization of linear traffic distribution problem in terms of the road toll structure assuming an autonomous transportation system, International journal for traffic and transport engineering.
13. R. K. Kaushik Anjali and D. Sharma, "Analyzing the effect of partial shading on performance of grid-connected solar PV systems," 2018 3rd international conference and workshops on recent advances and innovations in engineering (icraie).
14. R. Kaushik, o. P. Mahela, p. K. Bhatt, b. Khan, s. Padmanaban, and f. Blaabjerg, "a hybrid algorithm for recognition of power quality disturbances," in ieee access, 2020.
15. Kaushik, R. K. "pragati. Analysis and case study of power transmission and distribution." j adv res power electro power sys 7 (2020).
16. Sharma, Richa, and Kumar, Gireesh. "Availability modelling of cluster-based systems with software aging and optional rejuvenation policy." Cybernetics and Information Technologies, 2019.
17. G. Kumar and R. Sharma, "Analysis of software reliability growth model under two types of faults and warranty cost," 2017 2nd international conference on system reliability and safety (ICSRS), Milan, Italy, 2017.
18. Kumar, G., Kaushik, M., and Purohit, R. (2018), “reliability analysis of software with three types of errors and imperfect debugging using the Markov model,” international journal of computer applications in technology.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
