India-Pakistan Trade as a Catalyst for Peace process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/n659ds30Keywords:
Trade, positive list, Kashmir, composite dialogue, peaceAbstract
Historically, the Indian subcontinent was well connected as one integrated economic entity. At the time of partition in 1947, India and Pakistan formed not only one political entity but also one integrated economy. Greater Punjab was one economic entity for centuries before partition bifurcated it between India and Pakistan in 1947. Karachi and Bombay were closely tied sister cities on the sea under the same administrative unit of the Bombay Presidency of the British Raj. Today these regions are all but severed. Earlier, these regions enjoyed trade complementarities and thus interdependence between them. A salient feature of this interdependence is that Pakistan produced raw materials while India processed, thus earning a much higher rate of return. After the 1950s, both countries tried to minimize their trade interdependence. Thereafter, trade volume witnessed a steep decline. The India-Pakistan war of 1965 brought to a halt even the limited amount of trade that was there at the time. This was followed by the Bangladesh War in 1971. Trade on a limited scale resumed only in 1975. In 1996, India and Pakistan became signatories to the South Asia Preferential Trade Agreement, requiring member states to reform tariffs and increase intra-regional trade. In the same year, India granted Pakistan the Most Favored Nation status, and Pakistan decided to expand its positive list (imports from India) to include 596 items. The positive list went on expanding till 2012, when it was finally replaced by a negative list of 1209 items. The present volume of official bilateral trade hovers around US$ 2.3 billion as of 2018. But the bilateral trade balance is heavily in favor of India. Greater India-Pakistan trade will increase the prospects of peace in South Asia.
Downloads
References
1. The composite dialogue is a type of structured dialogue process between India and Pakistan. Under this dialogue process, eight issues of bilateral dispute are being discussed. The eight issues are: (i) Peace and Security, including CBMs (ii) Jammu and Kashmir (iii) Siachen (iv) Wullar Barrage Project/Tulbul Navigation Project (v) Sir Creek (vi) Terrorism and Drug Trafficking (vii) Economic and Commercial Cooperation and (viii) Promotion of Friendly Exchanges in various fields. The composite dialogue process was originally started in 1997, but due to the Kargil War it was halted. It was only in 2004 that the dialogue process was revived by Pakistan President General Pervez
Musharraf and Indian Prime Minister Shri Vajpayee in Islamabad.
2. Wirsing, Robert (2004). Kashmir in the Shadow of War: Regional Rivalries in a Nuclear Age. Gurgaon, India: Spring Books, p. 17.
3. The two foreign secretaries agreed to discuss ‘all outstanding issues of concern, including, inter alia: (a) peace and security, including CBMs; (b) Jammu and Kashmir; (c) Siachen; (d) Wullar Barrage Project/Tulbul Navigation Project; (e) Sir Creek; (f) terrorism and drug trafficking; (g) economic and commercial cooperation; and (h) promotion of friendly exchanges in various fields. It was decided that the first two issues would be dealt with at the level of foreign secretaries, who will also coordinate and monitor the progress of work of all the working groups.
4. Noorani, A. G. (2008). India-Pakistan Peace Process. Institute of Regional Studies, Seminar Papers, Islamabad, 20-21 Oct. 2008, pp. 136-137.
5. Pattanaik, S. & Arpita Anan. (2010). Cross-LoC Confidence Building Measures between India and Pakistan: A Giant Leap or a Small Step towards Peace?. Institute for Defense Studies and Analyses, Issue Brief, February 12, 2010.
6. For details, see Joint Statement: President Musharraf and PM Vajpayee, Islamabad, January 6, 2004. Retrieved from: http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/countries/india/document/papers/indo_pak-6jan04.htm
7. The Actual Ground Position Line refers to the existing position that divides Indian and Pakistani troops in the Siachen Glacier region. The line extends from the northernmost point of the LoC to Indira Col. The AGPL is about 110 kilometers long.
8. On the eve of Id ul Fitr, Pakistani Prime Minister Zafarullah Jamali announced a ceasefire offer to India along the International Border (IB) and the Line of Control (LoC) on 23 November 2003. India proposes extension of the ceasefire along the Actual Ground Position Line (AGPL) in Siachen. Formal ceasefire between India and Pakistan along the International Border (IB), Line of Control (LoC), and Actual Ground Position Line (AGPL) in Jammu and Kashmir began at midnight on November 25, 2003.
9. The composite dialogue process between India and Pakistan has been replacing enmity with amity. The peace process between India and Pakistan has been on a cordial path. Since the rapprochement began in April 2003, significant progress has been made in normalizing relations between the belligerent neighbors. This began after then Indian Prime Minister A.B. Vajpayee’s Srinagar statement in April 2003. The goodwill gesture was well received by the then Prime Minister of Pakistan, Zafarullah Jamali. He responded positively not only rhetorically, but he also took practical initiatives to materialize the good will gesture. Consequently, diplomatic representation at the two capitals has been restored; a ceasefire was declared at the Siachen and LoC; road, rail, and air links have been revived; delegations of businessmen, Members of Parliament, artists, and poets have exchanged visits; and cricket ties resumed after a break of nearly a decade and a half. Above all, both sides’ rulers and higher government officials met a number of times to ameliorate India-Pakistan relations.
10. Noorani, A.G. opacity., p. 132.
11. Behuria, Ashok. (2011). Pakistan-India Relations: An Indian Narrative. Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development and Transparency (PILDAT), Background Paper, January 2011, p. 9.
a. Retrieved from: http://www.pildat.org/publications/publication/FP/PakistanIndiaRelations-AnIndianNarrative.pdf
12. Vakil, C.N. & G. Raghava Rao. (1968). Economic Relations between India and Pakistan: Need for International Cooperation, Bombay: Vora & Co., 1968, pp. 156-57.
13. For details, see India-Pakistan Trade Agreement, 23 January 1975. Available at: http://www.commonlii.org/in/other/treaties/INTSer/1975/5.html
14. Bajpai Kanti et al. (1995).Brass-tacks and Beyond: Perception and Management of Crisis in South Asia, New Delhi: Manohar, pp. 9-10.
15. Annual Report 1983-84, MEA Library, Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, p. 3. The Hindu, April 11, 1999.
16. Naqvi, Zareen. (2009). Pakistan-India Trade Potential and Issues, The Lahore Journal of Economics, Lahore: Lahore School of Economics, Vol. 14, September 2009, p. 179.
17. Misra, Ashutosh. (2007). An audit of the India-Pakistan peace process. Australian Journal of International Affairs, Volume 61, Issue 4, 2007, p. 520. Retrieved from:
18. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10357710701684955
19. Manjunath, KS, Seema Sridhar, and Beryl Anand. (2006). Indo-Pak Composite Dialogue 2004-05: A Profile.Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS), New Delhi, Special Report 12, February 2006.
Retrieved from:
b. http://www.ipcs.org/pdf_file/issue/1372586579IPCS-Special-Report-12.pdf
c. Ibid.
20. Joint Statement, Third Round of Pakistan-India Talks on Economic and Commercial Cooperation, Islamabad, 29 March 2006.
Retrieved from:
21. Joint Statement on the Fourth Round of India-Pakistan Talks on Economic and Commercial Cooperation, New Delhi, August 1, 2007.
a. Retrieved from:
22. Ibid.
23. For details, see “Joint Statement of the 5th round of talks on Commercial and Economic Cooperation between
Commerce Secretaries of India and Pakistan”. Available at:
24. http://www.indiapakistantrade.org/data/jointstatements/Joint%20Statement%2028%20April%202011.pdf
25. In September 2011, Pakistan’s Commerce Minister, Makhdoom Amin Fahim met his Indian counterpart, Anand
Sharma to kick start talks to normalize trade. Fahim became Pakistan's first Commerce Minister to visit India in 35
years and the trade ministries of both nations made a joint statement to lay out a timeline for removing all non-tariff
barriers.
26. Yousaf, Kamran. (2011). SAARC summit: PMs Pledge ‘new chapter’ in ties. The Express Tribune, Pakistan,
November 10, 2011. Retrieved from:
a. http://tribune.com.pk/story/289627/saarc-summit-gilani-singh-eye-future-progress-at-talks/
27. For details, see “Joint Statement of the 6th round of talks on Commercial and Economic Cooperation between
Commerce Secretaries of India and Pakistan”, November 16, 2011. Available at:
28. http://commerce.nic.in/trade/Minutes14-16Nov2011.pdf
29. Joint Statement of the 7th Round of talks on Commercial and Economic Co-Operation between Commerce
Secretaries of India and Pakistan, 21 September 2012.
30. NDTV News. (2012). New check post opened at Attari, to boost sub-continental trade. April 13, 2012.
a. Available at: http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/new-checkpost-opened-at-attari-to-boost-sub-continental-trade-476526
31. For more details, see “Joint Statement of the 7th round of talks on Commercial and Economic Cooperation between
Commerce Secretaries of India and Pakistan”, September 21, 2012. Available at:
a. http://www.pib.nic.in/newsite/erelease.aspx?relid=87891
32. Raihan,Selim and Prabir De. (2013). India-Pakistan Economic Cooperation: Implications for Regional Integration
in South Asia. A Report, Commonwealth Secretariat, London, UK, April 2013, p. 46.
33. Taneja, Nisha and Samridhi Bimal. (2012). Liberalizing India-Pakistan Investment Flows.India-Pakistan Trade
Newsletter, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), October 2012, p. 2.
34. Ibid., p. 3.
35. Taneja,Nisha and Samridhi Bimal. (2012). FDI-a major milestone in Indo-Pak ties.The Hindu Business Line,August
22, 2012.
36. Taneja, Nisha and Samridhi Bimal. Liberalizing India-Pakistan Investment Flows. p. 3.
37. For details, see “Joint Statement of the 5th round of talks on Commercial and Economic Cooperation between
Commerce Secretaries of India and Pakistan”. Available at:
38. http://www.indiapakistantrade.org/data/jointstatements/Joint%20Statement%2028%20April%202011.pdf
39. For details see, “Joint Press Statement of the Commerce Ministers of India and Pakistan”, 18 January 2014, New
Delhi. Available at:
a. http://www.commerce.gov.pk/Readmore/Pak_India_Ministers_Joint_Statement_18012014.pdf
40. For details see, “The India Show: Land of Limitless Opportunities”, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Govt. of
Indian & FICCI, February 14-16, 2014. Available at:
a. http://www.ficci.com/events/21770/Add_docs/India-show-Pakistan-2014.pdf
41. Chowdhury, Jhinuk. (2014). Can trade be the game changer in Indo-Pak relations Network, June 12, 2014.
a. Retrieved from: http://rt.com/op-edge/165324-india-pakistan-relations-trade/
42. The principle of non-discrimination stipulates that a member of the WTO shall not discriminate between “like”
products from different trading partners (giving them equally “most favored nation” or MFN status, GATT Article
I); and between its own and like foreign products (giving them “national treatment”, GATT Article III).
43. Chowdhury, Jhinuk, loc.cit.
44. E-mail conversation with the researcher, 6th June 2014.
a. Conversation with the researcher on 9th June 2014.
45. Ibid.
46. E-mail communication to the researcher, 10th June 2014.
47. Haider, Mateen. 2014). Nawaz. The Dawn, Pakistan, June 13, 2014.
a. Retrieved from: http://www.dawn.com/news/1112499
b. E-mail communication to the researcher, 10th June 2014.
48. Personal conversation with the author, 29th June 2014, University of Kashmir, Srinagar.
a. Chowdhury, Jhinuk, loc. cit.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
