Evaluating District and Sub-Divisional Court Management in West Bengal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/pmsx1n49Keywords:
Court performance and governance, Court management, Court managers, Evolution of Indian court management, Judicial administration in ancient India, Key managerial areas of Judiciary, Obstacles for Indian trial courtsAbstract
The society in a democratic polity cannot be conceived without a strong and independent judicial system. India, the world’s largest democracy, suffers from more than four crore pending cases across several district and taluka (sub-divisional) courts at par with the National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG), and such a number has been raised by 13 percent only between 2019 and 2020. There are a number of judicial or legal procedural factors that contribute to the backlog that always lies in the limelight. On the other hand, the conflict and contrast between the aspiration and achievement of performance of the courts and judges are hardly measured. It is undeniable that without the development of internal management and governance, the judicial organisation cannot serve up to the expectations of the people. Accordingly, evolution of the Indian court management system as well as a few marginalised arenas of the district and sub-divisional courts’ management and governance have been explored under this study. Furthermore, comprehensiveness of the specific problems spotted under each domain has been empirically verified from the perspective of different stakeholders of the justice delivery system (such as judges, lawyers, academicians, administrators, and litigants) within the state of West Bengal. This study reveals that an effective and efficient judicial administration prevailed in ancient India. Under this research, nearly 9 out of 10 litigants believe that courts are functioning at a less than optimal level, as well as interestingly, every 3 out of 4 judges disclose that they spend more time in judicial work and less in administration. The study finds that some of those problems are glaring for all the stakeholders, while few of these are stakeholder-specific. The statistical analysis also supports that all the stakeholders have commonality in some of the specific problems, like: length of trial of a case is uncertain; workload in court delays timely justice; court lacks policy for time-bound and cost-effective justice; and courts have poor infrastructure.
Downloads
References
1. All India Judges’ Association v. Union of India, 17 SCC para 12(ix) (Ind. Sup. Ct., 2018).
2. Brody, D. C. (2008), p. 115. The use of judicial performance evaluation to enhance judicial accountability, Judicial Independence, and Public Trust, 86 Denver University Law Review.
3. Chandrashekaran, S., et al. (Aug., 2019), p. 12. Building Better Courts: Surveying the Infrastructure of India’s District Courts Vidhi-Center for Legal Policy.
4. Dhavan, Justice S.S. (1960), p. 1. The Indian Judicial Survey: A Historical Survey, Allahabad High Court. Retrieved from: https://www.allahabadhighcourt.in/event/The IndianJudicialSystem_SSDhavan.pdf.
5. DiFrancesco, J.M. & Berman, S.J. (Summer 2000), pp. 29-36. Human Productivity: The New American Frontier, National Productivity Review.
6. Faizan, N. (2017), p. 300. Need of the Court Management in the Present Scenario, 4(6) South Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies.
7. Gallas, G., & Gallas, E. C. (1993), pp. 605-617. Court Management Past, Present, and Future: A Comment on Lawson and Howard, 15(2) Justice System Journal.
8. Government of India, Ministry of Finance, (Jul., 2019), pp. 98-114. Ending Matsyanyaya: How to ramp up capacity in the Lower Judiciary, 1 Economic Survey 2018-19.
9. Gupta, K. K. L. (Oct. 29, 2013). Induction of National Court Management Authority in Indian Judicial System: Need of the Hour, Live Law. Retrieved from https://www.livelaw.in/amp/induction-of-national-court-managementauthority-in-indian-judicial-system-need-of-the-hour-2/.
10. Hall, D. J. (2009), p. 935. The journey towards court excellence: trends and practices to meet the future, 51 South Texas Law Review.
11. Heller, P. (2000), pp. 484-519. Degrees of Democracy: Some comparative lessons from India, 52 (4) World Politics.
12. Jain, Dr. A. (n.d.). Inclusion of ancient Indian management techniques in management courses, Silicon India, Retrieved from: https://www.education.siliconindia.com/ viewpoint/cxoinsights/inclusion-of-ancient-indianmanagement-techniques-in-manageme nt-cources-nwid-25012.html.
13. Jeuland., E. (2018), pp. 18-19. Towards a New Court Management?, General Report. [Research Report] Université Paris 1—Pantheon Sorbonne.
14. Kaul, A. (2020). Court managers in the Indian Judiciary, Bar, and Bench. Retrieved from https://www.barandbench.com/columns/court-managers-in-the-indian-judiciary.
15. Koontz, H., & O’Donnell, C. (1955). Principles of Management: An Analysis of managerial functions (New York: McGraw-Hill).
16. Kumar., R. (Sep. 2013), pp. 80-82. Concept of Judiciary in Ancient India, 2(9) Global Research Analysis.
17. Lawson, H. O., & Dennis, E. H. (1993), pp. 580-604. Development of the Profession of Court Management: A History with Commentary, 15(2) Justice System Journal.
18. Lloyed, R. & Aho, W. (2020), pp. 27-46. The Four Functions of Management: An Essential Guide to Management Principles, Digital Press Book.
19. Lokur, J. M. B. (May 3-4, 2003). Case Management and Court Administration, Law Commission of India International Conference on ADR and Case Management, in New Delhi.
20. McConnell, E. B. (1991), pp. 710-721. Court management: The Judge’s role and responsibility, Justice System Journal.
21. Menon, Prof. N.R.M. (Sep. 2008). Law and Justice: A Look at the Role and Performance of Indian Judiciary, addressed at the Berkeley Seminar Series on Law and Democracy, University of California.
22. Pound, R. (Aug. 29, 1906). The causes of popular dissatisfaction with the administration of justice, addressed before the annual convention of the American Bar Association at 14 Am. Law. 445.
23. Rajendranan, Dr. C. (2010). Management precepts and practices in ancient India, Amrita Viswa Vidyapeetham. Retrieved from: https://www.amrita.edu/news/management-presepts-and-practices-in-ancient-india/.
24. Rambhau, S. S. (2014), pp. 256-283. Online Court-Case Management: Need of the Hour [Suggested Method for Subordinate Civil Courts], 1(7) International Journal of Research.
25. Re, Edward D. (Winter 1994), p. 3. The Causes of Popular Dissatisfaction with the Legal Profession, 68(1) St. John’s Law Review.
26. Saikia, B. (Apr. 2020). The Indian Legal History—from the times of the origin of the state to the English East India company, The Law Bug. Retrieved from: https://www.thelawbug.com/the-indian-legal-history-from-the-times-of/.
27. Sathiya, V. (July-Dec. 2016), p. 74. Judicial Administration during Ancient period in India, 3(2) HuSS: International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Sciences.
28. Sharma, S. (Spring 2005), p. 4. A Vedic Integration of Transitions in Management Thought: Towards Transcendental Management, 1 Gurukul Business Review.
29. Van Duizend, R. (2010), pp. 186-190. The international framework for court excellence, Future Trends in State Courts, National Center for State Courts.
30. Vattikoti, K. (2015), p. 139. The Legal Management: Court Administration, 4(1) Journal of Civil & Legal Sciences.
31. Veya, S.M.S., (Dec. 2017), pp. 88-95. Judiciary in ancient India, 19(12) IOSR Journal of Business and Management.
32. Yadav, Dr. V.K. (Mar. 2019), pp. 390-399. Judicial administration and justice in ancient India, 16(4) Journal of Advances and Scholarly Research in Allied Education.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
