POLITICAL AND COMMUNAL CONFLICT ON MURDER CASES IN INDIA

Authors

  • Dr. Balasaheb Sonajirao Garje Associate Professor, Legal Studies & Research, Himalayan University, Itanagar, AP. Author
  • Dr. Atibha Vijaya Singh Assistant Professor, Legal Studies, Usha Martin University, Ranchi, Jharkhand. Author
  • Mr. Jitendra Yadav Assistant Professor, ILSR, Mangalayatan University, Beswan, Uttar Pradesh. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/4x9brd35

Keywords:

Political, Communal, India, Conflict on Murder

Abstract

Conflicts that resulted in murder were examined in detail, as well as the formal and informal options available to and selected by the parties involved, as well as how a crime came to be committed, as well as the role played by criminal justice systems and any other relevant elements. Three years of data from the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) reveal a modest but practically consistent rise of statistics related to violent categories, with the numbers of crimes against bodies exceeding crimes against property and murder statistics indicating a little incline despite this. According to the 2013 Global Homicide Study, a substantial majority of killings are the result of interpersonal conflict, with India accounting for the highest percentage of homicides linked to interpersonal conflict at 48 percent (UNODC, 2014) 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Elliott Ash, Sam Asher (2021), "In-group bias in the Indian judiciary: Evidence from 5 million criminal cases." December 21, 2021

2. Neelo Farooqui & Absar Ahmad (2021), "Communal Violence, Mental Health and Their Correlates: A Cross-Sectional Study in Two Riot-Affected Districts of Uttar Pradesh in India,” Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, Volume 41, 2021, Issue 3

3. Violette Graff,” hindu-muslim communal riots in India (1947-1986),” 15 July, 2013

4. Underberg, D.; Rainer, H.; Wadsworth, J.; Wilson, T. (2013). ‘Unemployment and Domestic Violence: Theory and Evidence’ Discussion Paper No. 7515, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn. Retrieved on 21st Oct 2016 from Unemployment and Domestic Violence: Theory and Evidence—IZA

5. Angus, C. (2015). ‘Domestic and Family Violence’ Briefing Paper No. 5. NSW Parliamentary Research Service. Australia. Retrieved on 24th Jan 2016 from Domestic and Family Violence—Australian Policy Onlineapo.org.au/files/.../domestic_and_family_violence_briefing_paper_0.pdf

6. Tracy A. Bowell. 2020. What about isms, arguments, and argumentative harm? (2020).

7. Saloni Dash, Dibyendu Mishra, Gazal Shekhawat, and Joyojeet Pal. 2021. Divided We Rule: Influencer Polarization on Twitter During Political Crises in India. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.08361 (2021).

8. Adrian Little and Juliet Brought Rogers. 2017. The politics of ‘what about’: The problem of trauma trumping the political in conflictual societies. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19, 1 (2017), 172–187.

9. Rishabh Mehrotra, Scott Sinner, Wray Buntline, and Flexing Xian. 2013. Improving LDA topic models for microblogs via tweet pooling and automatic labeling. In Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, 889–892.

10. Dibyendu Mishra, Syeda Zainab Akbar, Arshia Arya, Saloni Dash, Rynaa Grover, and Joyojeet Pal. 2021. Rihanna versus Bollywood: Twitter Influencers and the Indian Farmers’ Protest. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.04031 (2021).

11. Naveen Mishra. 2018. Broadcast Media, Mediated Noise, and Discursive Violence—High Decibel TV Debates and the Interrupted Public Sphere. KOME: AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PURE COMMUNICATION INQUIRY 6, 1 (2018), 1-13.

12. Michael Roader, Andreas Both, and Alexander Hinesburg. 2015. Exploring the space of topic coherence measures. In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 399–408

Downloads

Published

30.04.2020

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 2 (2020): 24 (2) 2020

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

How to Cite

Sonajirao Garje, B., Vijaya Singh, A., & Yadav, J. (2020). POLITICAL AND COMMUNAL CONFLICT ON MURDER CASES IN INDIA. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(2), 9844-9850. https://doi.org/10.61841/4x9brd35