Comparıson Study of The Poisson Regression Model Parameters Estımated With Different tow Methods(statistical study)

Authors

  • Muthanna Ali Hussein Iraqi Ministry of Education/ General Directorate of Educational Planning/Iraq Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/fdtfzs48

Keywords:

Generalized linear model, Maximum Likelihood Method, linear least squares

Abstract

The aim of this study is a comparative examination of the estimation methods that can be employed to estimate Poisson regression model parameters. The occurrence number of any events that take place within a specified time period as a result of conducted experiments can be expressed as count data. The poisson regression model is employed as an important data interpretation tool to analyze this kind of count data. Poisson regression models are regarded as a sub-branch of generalized linear models.

The following two methods are used for parameter estimation: 1 (maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), 2) linear least squares (OLS). MATLAB-packaged software is used for generation of simulation data and for parameter estimates. Poisson regression model parameters were estimated, and models were generated by using Monte Carlo simulation with sample sizes of 30, 60, 90, and 100 in accordance with Poisson distribution.

Mean square error (MSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) criteria were used for comparison of estimated parameters in terms of their effectiveness

Mean square error (MSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) criteria were used for comparison of estimated parameters in terms of their effectiveness. As a result of comparison, it was shown that MLE gives better results than other methods, OLS. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Nasir, A. M., & Rashid, D. H. (1988). Statistical Inference, Baghdad University, Higher Education Printing Press, Iraq, Baghdad.

Atkins, D.C., Gallop, R.J. (2007). Rethinking How Family Researchers Model Infrequent Outcomes: A Tutorial On Count Regression And Zero-Inflated Models, Journal Of Family Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 4, Pp. 726–735.

Batah, F. S. (2010). A New Estimator By Generalized Modefied Jackknife Ridge Regression Estimator, Journal of Basrah Researches (Sciences), Vol. 37, No. 4, Pp. 138-149.

Binjie, G., Feng, P. (2013). Modified Gravitational Search Algorithm With Particle Memory Ability And Its Application, Jiangnan University, China.

Brent, R.P. (1973). Algorithms for Minimization Without Derivatives, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prenticehall, Cambridge University Press, USE, P. 78.

Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2013). Regression Analysis of Count Data (Vol. 53). Cambridge University Press.

Cameron, A.C., Trivedi, P.K. (1998). Essentials of Count Data Regression, Cambridge University Press, New York, USA

Chan, Y.H. (2005). Log-Linear Models: Poisson Regression. Singapore Med. J. 46(8), pp. 377–386.

De Jong, P., and Heller, G. Z. (2008). Generalized Linear Models for Insurance Data (Vol. 136). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dobson, J.A. (1990), An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models, New South Wales, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics Australia, pp. 30–33.

Fallah, N., Gu, H., Mohammad, K., Seyyedsalehi, S. A., Nourijelyani, K., & Eshraghian, M. R. (2009). Nonlinear Poisson regression using neural networks: a simulation study. Neural Computing and Applications, 18(8), 939-943.

Downloads

Published

30.04.2020

How to Cite

Ali Hussein, M. (2020). Comparıson Study of The Poisson Regression Model Parameters Estımated With Different tow Methods(statistical study). International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(2), 9757-9768. https://doi.org/10.61841/fdtfzs48