The Use of Swear Words in The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): Sociolinguistics Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/naq8rm51Keywords:
swear words, corpus, COCA, theme of swear words, function of swear words, sociolinguistics, politenessAbstract
The title of this study is The Use of Swear Words in the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): Sociolinguistics Study. The aim of this study is to analyse and scrutinize the frequently used swear words in the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) in view of their themes and functions. The method used in carrying out the study is the descriptive analysis method. The source of data used is taken from the official website of the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). The result of the research demonstrates that there are four frequently used swear words in the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). They are motherfucker with 770 occurrences (2%), asshole with 2386 occurrences (5%), fuck with 11098 occurrences (22%), shit with 17008 occurrences (34%), and damn with 18407 occurrences. There are four themes of swear words found: the religious theme, the scatological theme, the sexual activity theme, and the mother (family) theme. All four themes are represented with the same amount of data. There are four functions of swear words found. They are stand-alone functions: (1) expletive interjections (28%), (2) name-calling (29%), and slot filler functions: (3) emphasis (29%), (4) adverbial/adjectival intensifier (14%).
Downloads
References
[1] Dynel, Marta. 2012. Swearing methodologically: The (Im)politeness of Expletives in Anonymous Commentaries on Youtube. Journal of English Studies. 10 (25). doi: 10.18172/jes.179.
[2] Hendar, H. & Trisnandi, B. G. A. (2018). Politeness Strategies and Social Dimensions in Once Upon a Time Season 1 Movie Series: Sociopragmatics Study. English Journal Literacy Utama, 3(1), 18–25. doi:10.33197/ejlutama.vol3.iss1.2019.34
[3] Holmes, J. (2013). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (Fourth). London: Routledge.
[4] Jay, T. 2000. Why We Curse: A Neuropsycho-Social Theory of Speech. Philadelphia, PA: J. Benjamins.
[5] Jay, T., & Janschewitz, K. 2008. The Pragmatics of Swearing. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 4(2). doi: 10.1515/jplr.2008.013.
[6] Ljung, M. 2011. Swearing: A Cross-cultural Linguistic Study. United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
[7] Macmillan Dictionary: Free English Dictionary and Thesaurus. (n.d.). Retrieved February 12, 2020, from https://www.macmillandictionary.com
[8] Montagu, A. 1967. The Anatomy of Swearing. London and New York: Macmillan and Collier.
[9] McEnery, T. 2005. Swearing in English. Bad Language, Purity, and Power from 1586 to the Present. Abingdon:Routledge.
[10] Romaine, S. 2000. Language in Society: An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[11] Simatupang, E. C. & Amalia, S. (2016). A Sociolinguisitc Study on Code Switching Among Overseas Indonesia Students on Facebook Comments. 8th Widyatama International Seminar on Sustainability, Universitas Widyatama.
[12] Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
[13] Trudgill, P. 2000. Sociolinguistics: An Introduction to Language and Society. London: Penguin.
[14] Wardhaugh, R., & Fuller, J. M. 2015. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.