Integration of Safety Management System with other systems in Aircraft Maintenance Services Companies in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/mdp9bz20Keywords:
MRO, SMS, Implementation, safety, awarenessAbstract
One of the determinants of the advancement of the aviation industry is the support of aircraft maintenance companies, or aircraft maintenance and overhaul (MRO). The airlines are very hopeful of MRO facilities in order to extend the life of the company's assets to ensure the availability of transportation services in the future. MRO services are very complex because they involve various processes whose performance depends on aircraft buildup and maintenance reliability, regulations, spare parts availability, and availability of certified human resources (Vieira & Loures, 2016). The number of incidents of civil aviation accidents is the biggest issue for the entire world community, both national and international flights. There are four main parts of the organization that are operational actors in the aviation world: aircraft operator company, air traffic control organization, airport operations, and aviation operations (Aviation & Regulation, n.d.). The implementation process of applying SMS to MRO companies was built with four main pillars, namely: safety policy, safety risk management, safety assurance, and safety promotion media. The safety policy covers the concentration and commitment of the company's leadership to the implementation of the Safety Management System in an MRO, especially regarding the resources that must be provided by the leadership. Safety risk management includes monitoring of all ten potential hazards with conditions below the acceptable risk threshold. Safety assurance is a safety guarantee that is demonstrated by maintaining all potential hazards below the permitted value threshold. Safety promotion is an activity carried out continuously by the company to enhance the safety awareness of all company employees.
Downloads
References
[1] Atak, A., & Kingma, S. (n.d.). The author's personal copy Safety culture in an aircraft maintenance organisation : A view from the inside. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2010.08.007
[2] Authors, F. (2006). Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering Article information :
[3] Aviation, C., & Regulation, S. (n.d.). Republic of Indonesia Ministry of Transport Civil Aviation Safety Regulation (CASR).
[4] Ayeni, P., Baines, T., Lightfoot, H., & Ball, P. (2011). State-of-the-art of "Lean" in the Aviation Maintenance Repair Overhaul Industry, 225(11), 2108–2123.
[5] Chang, H. & Kora, A. (2014). The Operation Management Model of Aircraft Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) Business, III(Ii).
[6] FAA. (2016). Federation Aviation Administration.
[7] FAR. (2015). Federation Aviation Regulation.
[8] Gerede, E. (2015). A study of challenges to the success of the safety management system in aircraft maintenance organizations in Turkey. Safety Science, 73, 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.013
[9] Gill, G. K. & Shergill, G. S. (2004). Perceptions of safety management and safety culture in the aviation industry in New Zealand, 10, 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2004.02.002
[10] Hobbs, A. (n.d.). Fatigue Risk Management in Aviation Maintenance : Current Best Practices and Potential Future Countermeasures Federal Aviation Administration (June 2011).
[11] Jabarullah, N. H., Jermsittiparsert, K., Melnikov, P. A., Maseleno, A., Hosseinian, A., & Vessally, E. (2020). Methods for the direct synthesis of thioesters from aldehydes: a focus review. Journal of Sulfur Chemistry, https://doi.org/10.1080/17415993.2019.1658764.
[12] Kvalheim, S. A., & Dahl, Ø. (2016). Safety compliance and safety climate : A repeated cross-sectional study in the oil and gas industry. Journal of Safety Research, 59, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2016.10.006
[13] Lee, S. G., Ma, Y., Thimm, G. L., & Verstraeten, J. (2008). Product lifecycle management in aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul, 59, 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2007.06.022
[14] Model, T. H. E. I. (2012). Safety Management (October).
[15] Romero, A., Vieira, D., Romero, A., Vieira, D., Lifecycle, P., & Systems, M. (2016). Using the Product Lifecycle Management Systems to Improve Maintenance , Repair and Overhaul Practices : The Case of Aeronautical Industry To cite this version : HAL ID: hal-01386492 Using the Product Lifecycle Management Systems to Improve Maintenance , Repair and Overhaul Practices : the Case of Aeronautical industry, 0–11.
[16] Samaranayake, P. (2006). Current Practices and Problem Areas in Aircraft Maintenance Planning and Scheduling—Interfaced/Integrated System.
[17] Shappell, S. A., City, O., Wiegmann, D. A., & Report, F. (2000). The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS).
[18] Shappell, S., Carolina, S., Detwiler, C., & Boquet, A. (2007). Human Error and Commercial Aviation Accidents: An Analysis Using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System, 49(2), 227–242.
[19] Sisilia, Y. (2009). Implementasi Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan Sebagai Standar Keselamatan Pelayanan Lalu Lintas Udara, 16, 140–146.
[20] Standards, I., Practices, R., & Aviation, I. C. (2013). Safety Management.
[21] Talluri, K. T. (1998). The Four-Day Aircraft Maintenance Routing Problem (July 2014).
[22] Taylor, P., Miller, L. T., Park, C. S., Miller, L. T., & Park, C. S. (2010). The Engineering Economist : A Journal Devoted to the Problems of Capital Investment ECONOMIC ANALYSIS IN THE MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, AND OVERHAUL INDUSTRY: AN OPTIONS APPROACH INDUSTRY: AN OPTIONS APPROACH, (November 2014), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00137910490432593
[23] Vieira, D. R. & Loures, P. L. (2016). Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) Fundamentals and Strategies: An Aeronautical Industry Overview, 135(12), 21–29.
[24] Wiegmann, D. A., Zhang, H., & Von, T. L. (2009). The International Journal of Safety Culture: An Integrative Review (September 2013), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
