DETECTION OF INDUCIBLE CLINDAMYCIN RESISTANCE AMONG COAGULASE NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCUS ISOLATED FROM HEALTHY POPULATION

Authors

  • Deeksheeta P Undergraduate Student, Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical And Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India. Author
  • Gopinath Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical And Technical Sciences, Chennai – 600077 Tamil Nadu, India Author
  • Dhanraj Ganapathy Professor and Head Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical And Technical Sciences, Chennai – 600077 Tamil Nadu, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/72m9mk77

Keywords:

Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), inducible clindamycin resistance

Abstract

Clindamycin is an attractive agent for empirical therapy for various infections because of its excellent pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Clinical failures of clindamycin therapy for treatment of MRSA infections have been documented for strains that were clindamycin sensitive but erythromycin resistant. The failures were due to inducible resistance to clindamycin. A total of 20 normal flora isolates of Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) were subjected to an antibiotic sensitivity pattern followed by an inducible clindamycin resistance test. 20% were found to be D test-positive strains. The D-test is a simple & reliable method to detect inducible & constitutive clindamycin resistance in routine clinical diagnosis settings. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Lyall KDS, Gupta V, Chhina D. 2013. Inducible clindamycin resistance among clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of the Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences. 18(2). 112-115.

2. Ghosh S, Banerjee M. 2016. Methicillin resistance & inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Indian J Med Res. 143 (3). 362-364.

3. Roberts MC, Sutcliffe J, Courvalin P, Jensen LB, Rood J, Seppala H. 1999. Nomenclature for macrolide and macrolide-lincosamide streptogramin B resistance determinants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 43:2823-30.

4. Fiebelkorn KR, Crawford SA, McElmeel ML, Jorgensen JH. 2003. Practical disk diffusion method for detection of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 41:4740-4.

5. Clinical and laboratory standards institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; seventeenth informational supplement. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. 2015; Vol. 2(No. 1).

6. Kloos WE, Banerman TL. 1999. Staphylococcus and Micrococcus. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC, Yolken RH, editors. Chapter 22. Manual of clinical microbiology. Washington DC: ASM Press. 264–82.

7. Watanakunakorn C. 1976. Clindamycin therapy of Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis: clinical relapse and development of resistance to clindamycin, lincomycin, and erythromycin. Am J Med. 60:419-25.

8. Drinkovic D, Fuller ER, Shore KP, Holland DJ, Ellis-Pegler R. 2001. Clindamycin treatment of Staphylococcus aureus expressing inducible clindamycin resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother. 48:315-6.

9. Siberry GK, Tekle T, Carroll K, Dick J. 2003. Failure of clindamycin treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus expressing inducible clindamycin resistance in vitro. Clin Infect Dis.37:1257-60.

Downloads

Published

30.04.2020

How to Cite

P, D., Gopinath, & Ganapathy, D. (2020). DETECTION OF INDUCIBLE CLINDAMYCIN RESISTANCE AMONG COAGULASE NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCUS ISOLATED FROM HEALTHY POPULATION. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(2), 7481-7487. https://doi.org/10.61841/72m9mk77