AWARENESS ON HAEMOSTATIC DRUGS IN MANAGEMENT OF BLEEDING SOCKETS AMONG DENTAL STUDENTS

Authors

  • Ghayathri Vijaya Kumaran Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, India Author
  • Dhanraj Ganapathy Professor and Head, Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, India Author
  • Kiran Kumar Senior lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute Of Medical And Technical Sciences, Chennai, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/6pd04153

Keywords:

bleeding, socket, haemostatic, drugs, dental, student

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the understanding regarding haemostatic drugs in management of bleeding sockets among dental students. The purpose of this study is to create awareness and determine the understanding of haemostatic drugs in the management of bleeding sockets among dental students. This study was conducted based on a questionnaire that consisted of 10 questions through a web-linked application called Survey Monkey. A convenient sample size of 100 consecutive dental students who are currently practicing in Chennai participated in the study. As an overall result, most of the participants are aware of haemostatic drugs in the management of bleeding sockets. As a conclusion, the awareness of haemostatic drugs in the management of bleeding sockets and their role and development among dental students in Chennai is adequate, but certain knowledge has to be brushed up among them for a higher level. Furthermore, they need to be trained on these grounds to help them treat their patients with more consent and awareness. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Vyas KS, Saha SP. Comparison of hemostatic agents used in vascular surgery. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2013;13:1663–72.

2. Lashof-Sullivan M, Shoffstall A, Lavik E. Intravenous hemostats: challenges in translation to patients. Nanoscale 2013;5:10719–28.

3. Stuke LE, Pons PT, Guy JS, Chapleau WP, Butler FK, McSwain NE. Prehospital Spine Immobilization for Penetrating Trauma—Review and Recommendations From the Prehospital Trauma Life Support Executive Committee. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care 2011;71:763–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0b013e3182255cb9.

4. Alam HB, Burris D, DaCorta JA, Rhee P. Hemorrhage control in the battlefield: role of new hemostatic agents. Mil Med 2005;170:63-9.

5. Granville-Chapman J, Jacobs N, Midwinter MJ. Pre-hospital haemostatic dressings: a systematic review. Injury 2011;42:447–59.

6. Emilia M, Luca S, Francesca B, Luca B, Paolo S, Giuseppe F, et al. Topical hemostatic agents in surgical practice. Transfus Apher Sci 2011;45:305–11.

7. Arnaud F, Tomori T, Carr W, McKeague A, Teranishi K, Prusaczyk K, et al. Exothermic reaction in zeolite hemostatic dressings: QuikClot ACS and ACS+. Ann Biomed Eng 2008;36:1708–13.

8. Waibel KH, Haney B, Moore M, Whisman B, Gomez R. Safety of chitosan bandages in shellfish allergic patients. Mil Med 2011;176:1153-6.

9. Mahdy AM, Webster NR. Perioperative systemic haemostatic agents. Br J Anaesth 2004;93:842–58.

10. Fraser IS, Porte RJ, Kouides PA, Lukes AS. A benefit-risk review of systemic haemostatic agents: part 1: in major surgery. Drug Saf 2008; 31:217–30.

11. Troulis MJ, Head TW, Leclerc JR. Dental extractions in patients on an oral anticoagulant: a survey of practices in North America. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 56:914-7; discussion 917-8.

12. Seyednejad H, Imani M, Jamieson T, Seifalian AM. Topical haemostatic agents. Br J Surg 2008; 95:1197–225.

13. Cinar C, Odabaş ME, Akca G, Işik B. Antibacterial effect of a new haemostatic agent on oral microorganisms. J Clin Exp Dent 2012;4:e151–5.

14. Hedner U. General haemostatic agents—fact or fiction? Pathophysiol Hemost Thromb 2002;32 Suppl 1:33–6.

15. Manoharan S, Gayathri R, Priya VV. Awareness of hemostatic agents among undergraduate dental students. Drug Invention Today 2018.

16. Blinder D, Manor Y, Martinowitz U, Taicher S. Dental extractions in patients maintained on continued oral anticoagulant: Comparison of local hemostatic modalities. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology 1999;88:137–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70106-x.

17. Carter G, Goss A, Lloyd J, Tocchetti R. Tranexamic acid mouthwash versus autologous fibrin glue in patients taking warfarin undergoing dental extractions: a randomized prospective clinical study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:1432–5.

18. Kiruthika P, Dhanraj M, Jain AR. Effectiveness of local hemostatic agents following dental extraction: A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education & Research, Jan-Mar 2017; 7.

19. Mp SK. Local hemostatic agents in the management of bleeding in oral surgery. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2016;9:35–41.

20. Dunn CJ, Goa KL. Tranexamic Acid. Drugs 1999;57:1005–32.

21. Jenkins HP, Janda R. Studies on the use of gelatin sponge or foam as an hemostatic agent in experimental liver resections and injuries to large veins. Ann Surg 1946;124:952–61.

Downloads

Published

30.04.2020

How to Cite

Vijaya Kumaran, G., Ganapathy, D., & Kumar, K. (2020). AWARENESS ON HAEMOSTATIC DRUGS IN MANAGEMENT OF BLEEDING SOCKETS AMONG DENTAL STUDENTS. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(2), 6945-6951. https://doi.org/10.61841/6pd04153