AWARENESS ABOUT ROXOLID IMPLANTS AMONG DENTAL STUDENTS

Authors

  • Nithyanandham Masilamani Tutor, Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai,India Author
  • Dhanraj Ganapathy Professor &Head of Department, Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/812hqa94

Keywords:

Awareness, Roxolid implants, dental students

Abstract

Roxolid implants are endosseous root-form implants made of an alloy comprising 85% titanium and 15% zirconium. This unique combination greatly improves the tensile and fatigue strengths of implants compared to the ones manufactured with commercially pure titanium and its alloys.The aim of the study was to assess the awareness about roxolid implants among dental students.This was a questionnaire-based cross-sectional type of study comprising 100 dental college students in Chennai. A self-designed questionnaire contains 10 questions based on the knowledge and awareness of the Roxolid implant system among dental college students. Questionnaires were circulated through an online website survey planetThe questions explored the awareness on using Roxolid implants, their indications, contraindications and clinical advantages. After the responses were received from 100 participants, data was collected and analysed.37% are aware about Roxolid implants . 33% are aware of the indications of Roxolid implants . 25% are aware of the contraindications of Roxolid implants . 23% are aware of the clinical advantages of Roxolid implants.3% use Roxolid implants. The awareness about Roxolid implant systems was moderate among dental students.Hence, more intensive educational and awareness programs need to be initiated to improve the knowledge and application of Roxolid implants in clinical practice. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Al-Nawas, B., Brägger, U., Meijer, H. J. A., Naert, I., Persson, R., Perucchi, A., Quirynen, M., Raghoebar, G. M., Reichert, T. E., Romeo, E., Santing, H. J., Schimmel, M., Storelli, S., ten Bruggenkate, C., Vandekerckhove, B., Wagner, W., Wismeijer, D., & Müller, F. (2012). A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) of Titanium-13Zirconium versus Titanium Grade IV Small-Diameter Bone Level Implants in Edentulous Mandibles: Results from a 1-Year Observation Period. In Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research (Vol. 14, Issue 6, pp. 896–904). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00324.x

2. Altinci, P., Can, G., Gunes, O., Ozturk, C., & Eren, H. (2016). Stability and Marginal Bone Level Changes of SLActive Titanium-Zirconium Implants Placed with Flapless Surgery: A Prospective Pilot Study. In Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research (Vol. 18, Issue 6, pp. 1193–1199). https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12392

3. Altuna, P., Lucas-Taulé, E., Gargallo-Albiol, J., Figueras-Álvarez, O., Hernández-Alfaro, F., & Nart, J. (2016). Clinical evidence on titanium-zirconium dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. In International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Vol. 45, Issue 7, pp. 842–850). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.01.004

4. Brizuela-Velasco, A., Pérez-Pevida, E., Jiménez-Garrudo, A., Gil-Mur, F. J., Manero, J. M., Punset-Fuste, M., Chávarri-Prado, D., Diéguez-Pereira, M., & Monticelli, F. (2017). Mechanical Characterisation and Biomechanical and Biological Behaviours of Ti-Zr Binary-Alloy Dental Implants. BioMed Research International, 2017, 2785863.

5. Gamborena, I., & Blatz, M. B. (2014). Evolution: Contemporary Protocols for Anterior Single-Tooth Implants. Quintessence Publishing (IL).

6. Herrmann, J., Hentschel, A., Glauche, I., Vollmer, A., Schlegel, K. A., & Lutz, R. (2016). Implant survival and patient satisfaction of reduced-diameter implants made from a titanium-zirconium alloy: A retrospective cohort study with 550 implants in 311 patients. In Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery (Vol. 44, Issue 12, pp. 1940–1944). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.09.007

7. Kopf, B. S., Ruch, S., Berner, S., Spencer, N. D., & Maniura-Weber, K. (2015). The role of nanostructures and hydrophilicity in osseointegration: in vitroprotein-adsorption and blood-interaction studies. In Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A (Vol. 103, Issue 8, pp. 2661–2672). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35401

8. Müller, F., On behalf of the Roxolid Study Group, Al-Nawas, B., Storelli, S., Quirynen, M., Hicklin, S., Castro-Laza, J., Bassetti, R., & Schimmel, M. (2015). Small-diameter titanium grade IV and titanium zirconium implants in edentulous mandibles: five-year results from a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. In BMC Oral Health (Vol. 15, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-015-0107-6

9. Nyström, E., Ahlqvist, J., Gunne, J., & Kahnberg, K. E. (2004). 10-year follow-up of onlay bone grafts and implants in severely resorbed maxillae. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 33(3), 258–262.

10. Quirynen, M., Al-Nawas, B., Meijer, H. J. A., Razavi, A., Reichert, T. E., Schimmel, M., Storelli, S., Romeo, E., & the Roxolid Study Group. (2015). Small-diameter titanium Grade IV and titanium zirconium implants in edentulous mandibles: three-year results from a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. In Clinical Oral Implants Research (Vol. 26, Issue 7, pp. 831–840). https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12367

11. Reis, R., Nicolau, P., Calha, N., Messias, A., & Guerra, F. (2019). Immediate versus early loading protocols of titanium—zirconium narrow-diameter implants for mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients: 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial. In Clinical Oral Implants Research (Vol. 30, Issue 10, pp. 953–961). https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13502

12. Schimmel, M., Srinivasan, M., McKenna, G., & Müller, F. (2018). Effect of advanced age and/or systemic medical conditions on dental implant survival: A systematic review and meta-analysis. In Clinical Oral Implants Research (Vol. 29, Issue S16, pp. 311–330). https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13288

13. Shaik, L. S. (2016). The Effect of Ridge Expansion on Implant Stability in Narrow Partially Edentulous Ridges—A Preliminary Clinical Study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2016/21286.8452

14. Sikora, C. L., Alfaro, M. F., Yuan, J. C.-C., Barao, V. A., Sukotjo, C., & Mathew, M. T. (2018). Wear and Corrosion Interactions at the Titanium/Zirconia Interface: Dental Implant Application. In Journal of Prosthodontics (Vol. 27, Issue 9, pp. 842–852). https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12769

15. Srinivasan, M., Makarov, N. A., Herrmann, F. R., & Müller, F. (2016). Implant survival in 1- versus 2-implant mandibular overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. In Clinical Oral Implants Research (Vol. 27, Issue 1, pp. 63–72). https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12513

Downloads

Published

30.04.2020

How to Cite

Masilamani, N., & Ganapathy, D. (2020). AWARENESS ABOUT ROXOLID IMPLANTS AMONG DENTAL STUDENTS. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(2), 6509-6516. https://doi.org/10.61841/812hqa94