Competencies of the Special Education Student Teachers: A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/w3ydxp77Keywords:
Competency, Student, Teachers, Special, Education Needs, Training, Base Competency, Development CompetencyAbstract
Special education of student teachers requires highly specialized competencies to get prepared to teach the students with special needs and to predict and cope with problems that may occur during their work. This study explored the definition and domains of special education student teachers competencies. This study was a systematic review of special education student teachers' competencies in English databases (2000-2020). A comprehensive search through multiple known databases identified a dataset of 112 papers, from which 23 papers were retrieved in the final step. Individual, social, ethical, methodological, and professional domains were defined as belonging to special education student teachers’ competence. Moreover, factors affecting the development of the competencies were identified. Although the competencies and their domains vary by culture and across countries, this systematic review demonstrated the comprehensive ones in these scopes.
Downloads
References
1. A.K. Kulshrestha, Kshama Pandey 2013, Teachers training and professional competence, Voice of Research, Vol. 1, Issue 4.
2. Biggs, Elizabeth E.; Gilson, Carly B.; Carter, Erik W. 2019, “Developing That Balance": Preparing and Supporting Special Education Teachers to Work with Paraprofessionals, Article, Teacher Education and Special Education, Volume: 42, issue: 2, page(s): 117-131.
3. Cevriye Ergul & etc. 2013, Opinions of In-Service and Pre-Service Special Education Teachers on the Competencies of the Undergraduate Special Education Programs, Educational Sciences Theory and Practice, v13 n1, p518-522.
4. Christine M. Taylor 2008, Identifying training needs of paraprofessionals, Presented to the Department of Educational Leadership and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education.
5. Conley, Sharon; You, Sukkyung 2017, Key Influences on Special Education Teachers' Intentions to Leave: The Effects of Administrative Support and Teacher Team Efficacy in a Mediational Model, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, Volume: 45 issue: 3, page(s): 521-540.
6. Eman Al-Zboon, Theeb, Raied Sheikh, Muhaidat, Mohammad Ali; Zboon, 2013, Professional competencies among pre-service teachers in special education from their perspectives, Teacher Education and Special Education, Vol. 135, No. 1.
7. Hasan Tanang, Baharin Abu, Teacher Professionalism and Professional Development Practices in South Sulawesi, Indonesia, Journal of Curriculum and Teaching Vol. 3, No. 2; 2014.
8. Helen Huntly 2002, Beginning Teachers Conceptions of Competence’, Journal of College Teaching & Learning,
9. Jonathan Chitiyoo, Wayne Brinda 2018, Teacher Preparedness in the Use of Co-teaching in Inclusive Classrooms, Support for Learning, Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages 38-51.
10. Koca, Fatih, 2018, Exploring the influence of professional development on teacher careers: developing a path model approach, Vol. 16, No. 45.
11. Lee, Yeunjoo; Patterson, Philip P.; Vega, Luis A. 2011, Perils to Self-Efficacy Perceptions and TeacherPreparation Quality among Special Education Intern Teachers, Teacher Education Quarterly, v38 n2, p61-76.
12. Li Feng, Tim R. Sass 2012, What Makes Special Education Teachers Special? Teacher Training and Achievement of Students with Disabilities, Volume 36, Pages122-134.
13. Mara H. Wasburn, Leah Wasburn-Moses, and Darrel R. Davis 2010, Mentoring Special Educators: The Roles of National Board Certified Teachers, Journal of Teacher Education and Special Education, Volume: 33, issue: 1, page(s): 59-66.
14. Meryem Uçar Rasmussen, Arzu Kış 2018, Qualifications of Subject Teachers in Special Education Schools, Article, Journal of Education and Training Studies. Vol. 6, No. 4.
15. Moher, D., et al., 2009. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (reprinted from Annals of Internal Medicine). Physical Therapy, 89(9), 873–880. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
16. Nancy Maynes, Anna-Liisa Mottonen, Glynn Sharpe, and Tracey Curwen (2015), A Comparative Examination of Teacher Candidates’ Professional Practicum Experiences in Two Program Models, International Journal of Learning, Teaching, and Educational Research, pp. 63–77.
17. Paola Dusi, Monia Rodorigo, and Pietro Andus Aristo 2017, Teaching in Our Society: Primary Teachers and Intercultural Competencies, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 237, Pages 96-102.
18. Paul Vare, Grete Arro, Andre de Hamer & etc. 2019, Devising a Competence-Based Training Program for the Educators of Sustainable Development: Lessons Learned.
19. Pauline Swee Choo Goh, Qi Mullah Yusuf 2017, Perceptions of Competency of Novice Teachers, International Journal of Instruction, Vol. 10, No. 1.
20. Pauline Swee Choo Goh, Qismullah Yusuf, and Kung Teck Wong, Lived Experience: Perceptions of Competency of Novice Teachers, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2017.
21. Rob L Martens & Jeroen J. G. Van Merrienboer 2002, The Boundary Approach of Competence: A Constructivist Aid for Understanding and Using the Concept of Competence,
22. Sammy Godfrey Poro, Andrew Peter, Yiga Julius Caesar Enon, and Fabian Mwosi, Teacher competence and performance in primary schools in Nwoya District, Northern Uganda, International Journal of Advanced Research 4(1):3-8 · 2019
23. Sara B. Wool 2014, How Important Are They in the Context of Teacher Performance Evaluation? Special Education Professional Standards, Queens College, City University of New York, Volume: 38, issue: 4, page(s): 276-290
24. Zhu, Chang; Wang, Di; Cai, Yonghong; Engels, Nadine 2013, “What Core Competencies Are Related to Teachers' Innovative Teaching?” Journal Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, Volume 41, 2013—Issue 1.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
