INSIGHTFUL CORPORA WITH APPLIED TO ELT-CALL BETWEEN THE LINE OF LEARNING AND TEACHING IN COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/s0nhz502Keywords:
Corpora, Classroom concordance, ELT-CALL, Computational LinguisticsAbstract
This paper is pragmatically connected up with the Corpora and Classroom concordance-connected empirical issue of ELT-CALL in terms of planning to understand and training below the dynamic domain of underlying data-driven learning (DDL) exercise within the reach of Corpora-based investigation within the linguistics atmosphere. To unearth the groundbreaking reality of the middle productive price of Corpus, schoolroom concordance, and data-driven planning to understand, multiple ELT and CALL are entirely relayed on the pedagogic Corpora part, and capability expands with planning to understand and training in an exceedingly academic productive doable final leads to an even bigger extent. Therefore, this paper is obstinately inherent in perceptive Corpora concordance with sound clever utilitarian educational impact of learning and teaching in multi-dimensional method of data-driven mastering workout still as data-driven teaching workout via software system program concordance. This paper has nearly delivered out the exceptional monumental actual center price of Corpora (school area concordance) all-told varieties of ELTCALL component that's intently encompassed with pedagogic scope in terms of process linguistic (CL).
Downloads
References
1. Atkinson, D. (2004). Contrasting rhetoric's/contrasting cultures: Why contrastive rhetoric needs a better conceptualization of culture. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3, 277-289.
2. Bolshakov, Igor & Gelbukh, A. (2004). Computational Linguistics: Models, Resources, and Applications. Mexico, Center for Computing Research.
3. Boulton, A. & Cobb, T. (2017). Corpus use in language learning: A meta-analysis. Language Learning,67(2), 348–393. doi: 10.1111/lang.12224
4. Breyer, Y. (2006b). My concordancer: tailor-made software for language learners and teachers. In S. Braun, K. Kohn & J. Mukherjee (Eds.), Corpus technology and language pedagogy: New resources, new tools, new methods (pp. 157–176). Frankfurt a.m., New York, Oxford: Peter Lang.
5. Broughton, G., Brumfit, C., Flavell, R., Hill, P., & Pincas, A. (1978). Teaching English as a foreign language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
6. Chambers, A. (2005). Integrating corpus consultation in language studies. Language Learning & Technology, 9(2), 111–125. Retrieved April 13, 2008, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num2/ chambers/default.html
7. Casanave, C. P. (2004). Controversies in second language writing: Dilemmas and L2 Writing Pedagogy in EFL Contexts: An Exploration of Salient Practices in Teaching... decisions in research and instruction. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Conrad, S.M. (2004).
8. Corpus linguistics, language variation, and language teaching. In J.M. Sinclair (Ed.), How to use corpora in language teaching (pp. 67–85). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
9. Cresswell, A. (2007). Getting to ‘know’ connectors? Evaluating data-driven learning in a writing skills course. In E. Hidalgo Tenorio, L. Quer & J. Santana (Eds.), Corpora in the foreign language classroom (pp. 267–287). Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi.
10. Cheng, X. (2000). Asian students’ reticence revisited. System, 28(3), 435-446.
11. Connor, U. (2004). Intercultural rhetoric research: Beyond texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3, 291-304.
12. Gavioli, L. (2001). The learner as researcher: Introducing corpus concordancing in the classroom. In G. Aston (Ed.), Learning with corpora (pp. 108–137). Bologna:CLUEB.
13. Johns, T. (1991b). From printout to handout: Grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of data-driven learning. In T. Johns & P. King (Eds.), Classroom concordancing (pp. 27–45). Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
14. Kennedy, C., & Miceli, T. (2001). An evaluation of intermediate students’ approaches to corpus investigation. Language Learning & Technology, 5(3), 77–90.
15. Kay, Martin (2003) in Ruslan Mitkov, The Oxford Handbook of Computational Linguistics. U.S.A. Oxford University Press.
16. Miao, Y., Badger, R., & Zhen, Y. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179-200.
17. Nayar, P. B. (1997). ESL/EFL dichotomy today: language politics or pragmatics? TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 9-37.
18. Ortega, L. (2004). L2 writing research in EFL contexts: Some challenges and opportunities for EFL researchers [featured article]. ALAK [Applied Linguistics Association of Korea] ewsletter .
19. Seidlhofer, B. (2002). Pedagogy and local learner corpora: Working with learning-driven data. In S. Granger, J. Hung & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp. 213–234). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
20. Silva, T. (1990). Second language composition instruction: developments, issues, and directions in ESL. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 11–23). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Tribble, C. (2000). Practical uses for language corpora in ELT. In P. Brett & G. Motteram (Eds.), A special interest in computers (pp. 31–41). Whistable, Kent: IATFEL.
22. Tsui, A.B.M. (2004). What teachers have always wanted to know and how corpora can help. In J.M. Sinclair (Ed.), How to use corpora in language teaching (pp. 39–61). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
23. Vinther, J. (2004). Can parsers be a legitimate pedagogical tool? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(3-4), 267–288.
24. You, X. (2004). “The choice made from no choice”: English writing instruction in a Chinese university. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 97-110.
25. Uszkoreit, Hans: (2000) What is Computational Linguistics? http://www.coli.unisaarland.de/~hansu/what_is_cl.html.
26. Wintner, S. (2004). Hebrew Computational Linguistics: Past and Future. University of Haifa, Haifa.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
