SOETOMO SCORE AS A PREDICTOR OF HIV-ASSOCIATED NEUROCOGNITIVE DISORDERS

Authors

  • Fajar Rudy Qimindra Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya Author
  • Muhammad Hamdan Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya Jalan Mayjen Prof.Dr.Moestopo 6-8, Surabaya, Indonesia 60285. Author
  • Riani Wisnujono Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya Jalan Mayjen Prof.Dr.Moestopo 6-8, Surabaya, Indonesia 60285. Author
  • Yudha Haryono Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya Jalan Mayjen Prof.Dr.Moestopo 6-8, Surabaya, Indonesia 60285. Author
  • Abdulloh Machin Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya Jalan Mayjen Prof.Dr.Moestopo 6-8, Surabaya, Indonesia 60285. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/jvq92z92

Keywords:

Soetomo score, Neurocognitive disorder, Prognostic test

Abstract

Background HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders (HAND) was one of the neurological complications of HIV infection. However, no biomarkers have been sufficiently validated for prognosis.

Objective: To develop a scoring system and determine prognostic values of the Soetomo Score as a Predictor of HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders (SSP HAND).

Methods: The case-control study was performed at the UPIPI outpatient clinic. The examination is performed using MoCa-Ina.Eight parameters that were possible predictors of HAND were analyzed by bivariate and multivariate. Results were analyzed using a calibration test and a discrimination test to produce an Area Under Curve (AUC) value. The cut-off point could make identification of good and bad prognostics.

Results: The equation of SSP HAND was Y=-4.164+1.249 score total of SSP HAND. The AUC value of this score was 80.9% (95% CI=71.1%-90.6%). The value of SSP HAND was ≥3.5, which means that the sensitivity was 74.4% and the specificity was 79.5%. Subjects with scores 0–3 had good prognostic, while those with scores 4–5 had bad prognostic.

Conclusion: The value of SSP HAND ≥3.5 could make a good prediction of HAND. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Matinella A, Lanzafame M, Bonometti MA, Gajofatto A, Concia E, Vento S, et al. Neurological complications of HIV infection in pre-HAART and HAART eras: a retrospective study. Journal of Neurology 2015;262:1317-1327.

[2] Ueda, S., Witaningrum, A.M., Khairunisa, S.Q., Nasronudin, Kameoka, M. Transmission dynamics of HIV-1 subtype B strains in Indonesia. Scientific Reports. 2019;9(1),13986

[3] Williams DW, Calderon TM, Lopez L, Carvallo-Torres L, Gaskill PJ, Eugenin EA, et al. Mechanisms of HIV Entry into the CNS: Increased Sensitivity of HIV-Infected CD14 + CD16 + Monocytes to CCL2 and Key Roles of CCR2, JAM-A, and ALCAM in Diapedesis. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e69270.

[4] Williams DW, Veenstra M, Gaskill PJ, Morgello S, Calderon TM, Berman JW. Monocytes mediate HIV neuropathogenesis: mechanisms that contribute to HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. Curr HIV Res 2014;12:85-96.

[5] Nightingale S, Winston A, Letendre S, Michael BD, McArthur JC, Khoo S, et al. Controversies in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. The Lancet Neurology 2014;13:1139-1151.

[6] Cohen RA, Seider TR, Navia B. HIV effects on age-associated neurocognitive dysfunction: premature cognitive aging or neurodegenerative disease? Alzheimers Res Ther 2015;7:37.

[7] Barnes DE, Covinsky KE, Whitmer RA, Kuller LH, Lopez OL, Yaffe K. Predicting risk of dementia in older adults: The late-life dementia risk index. Neurology 2009;73:173-179.

[8] Exalto LG, Quesenberry CP, Barnes D, Kivipelto M, Biessels GJ, Whitmer RA. Midlife risk score for the prediction of dementia four decades later. Alzheimer's & Dementia 2014;10:562-570.

[9] Windarto, Anggriani, N. Global stability for a susceptible-infectious epidemic model with fractional incidence rate. Applied Mathematical Sciences. 2015;9(73-76), pp. 3775-3788

[10] Harnanti, D.V., Hidayati, A.N., Miftahussurur, M.Concomitant sexually transmitted diseases in patients with diagnosed HIV/AIDS: A retrospective study. African Journal of Infectious Disease. 2019; 12 (Special Issue 1), pp. 83-89

[11] Sinansari, R., Bambang Prajogo, E.W., and Widiyanti, P. In silico screening and biological evaluation of the compounds of justicia gendarussa leaf extract as interferon gamma inducer: A study of anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) development. African Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2018;12(Special Issue 1), pp. 140-147

[12] Yunifiar, M.Q., Kotaki, T., Witaningrum, A.M., (...), Nasronudin, N., Kameoka, M. Sero- and Molecular Epidemiology of HIV-1 in Papua Province, Indonesia. Acta medica Indonesiana. 2017; 49(3), pp. 205-214

[13] Wright EJ, Grund B, Robertson K, Brew BJ, Roediger M, Bain MP, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors are associated with lower baseline cognitive performance in HIV-positive persons. Neurology 2010;75:864-873.

[14] Chan LG, Kandiah N, Chua A. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) in a South Asian population—contextual application of the 2007 criteria. BMJ Open 2012;2:e000662.

[15] Cross S, Onen N, Gase A, Overton ET, Ances BM. Identifying risk factors for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders using the international HIV dementia scale. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 2013;8:1114-1122.

[16] Heaton RK, Franklin DR, Ellis RJ, McCutchan JA, Letendre SL, Leblanc S, et al. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders before and during the era of combination antiretroviral therapy: differences in rates, nature, and predictors. J Neurovirol 2011;17:3-16.

[17] Cysique LA, Vaida F, Letendre S, Gibson S, Cherner M, Woods SP, et al. Dynamics of cognitive change in impaired HIV-positive patients initiating antiretroviral therapy. Neurology 2009;73:342-348.

[18] Cysique LA, Murray JM, Dunbar M, Jeyakumar V, Brew BJ. A screening algorithm for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. HIV Med 2010;11:642-649.

[19] Munoz-Moreno JA, Fumaz CR, Ferrer MJ, Prats A, Negredo E, Garolera M, et al. Nadir CD4 cell count predicts neurocognitive impairment in HIV-infected patients. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2008;24:1301-1307.

[20] Ellis RJ, Badiee J, Vaida F, Letendre S, Heaton RK, Clifford D, et al. CD4 nadir is a predictor of HIV neurocognitive impairment in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy. AIDS (London, England) 2011;25.

[21] Levine AJ, Hinkin CH, Ando K, Santangelo G, Martinez M, Valdes-Sueiras M, et al. An exploratory study of long-term neurocognitive outcomes following recovery from opportunistic brain infections in HIV+ adults. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2008;30:836-843.

[22] Abdelgawad, M.A. Synthesis and antimicrobial evaluation of N-(3-benzoxazol-2-yl-phenyl) (2018) International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 10 (4), pp. 461-465. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-

85062387451&doi=10.31838%2fijpr%2f2018.10.04.070&partnerID=40&md5=269cbd06296ddff14baa9c45d72e7e33

[23] Pinzon, r. T. & sanyasi, . R. D. L. R. (2018) is there any benefit of citicoline for acute ischemic stroke ? Systematic review of current evidences. Journal of Critical Reviews, 5 (3), 11-14. doi:10.22159/jcr.2018v5i3.24568

[24] Patel RR, Patel JK. "Novel Technologies of Oral Controlled Release Drug Delivery System." Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy 1.2 (2010), 128-132. Print. doi:10.4103/0975-8453.75054

Downloads

Published

30.04.2020

How to Cite

Rudy Qimindra, F., Hamdan, M., Wisnujono, R., Haryono, Y., & Machin, A. (2020). SOETOMO SCORE AS A PREDICTOR OF HIV-ASSOCIATED NEUROCOGNITIVE DISORDERS. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(2), 4140-4150. https://doi.org/10.61841/jvq92z92