PAIN REDUCTION AFTER WET AND DRY CUPPING THERAPIES: ROLES OF α2β1 INTEGRIN AND μ-OPIOID RECEPTOR IN ANIMAL MODELS

Authors

  • Imam Subadi Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine/Universitas Airlangga Hospital, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60131, Indonesia Author
  • BoyaNugraha Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover 30625, Germany Author
  • AbdulhadiSuwandi Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Hannover 30625Medical School, Hannover, Germany Author
  • Nur Sulastri Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine/Universitas Airlangga Hospital, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60131, Indonesia Author
  • Imam Susilo Department of Pathology Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60131, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/dcg76v03

Keywords:

Dry cupping, pain reduction, wet cupping

Abstract

Background: Wet cupping therapy (WCT) and dry cupping therapy (DCT) are complementary therapies in pain management. Stretching keratinocytes by cupping seems to stimulate the expression of α2β1-integrin. Its benefit in pain reduction could be mediated by the expression of the μ-opioid receptor (MOR). Objective: This study aims to determine pain thresholds, α2β1-integrin, and MOR after WCT and DCT. Method: Thirty-two adult male Wistar rats were divided into negative control, positive control, DCT, and WCT groups. In the DCT group and WCT group, cupping was conducted at the left and right paralumbar regions 48 hours after CFA injection. A hot plate test was conducted 24 hours after therapy to assess pain threshold, and immunohistochemistry was conducted from the skin for α2β1-integrin and the spinal cord for MOR. Result: WCG showed the highest expression of α2β1-integrin in the keratinocytes and MOR in the lamina II spinal cord than the other groups. On immunohistochemical examination, the expression of α2β1 integrin showed positive cells (keratinocytes) with brown stain on dry cupping and wet cupping. Significant differences were shown between the negative control group and the positive control group, dry cupping therapy group, and wet cupping therapy group. Conclusion: WCT is more effective than DCT in reducing pain. The benefit of both therapies in reducing pain in rats could be mediated by the expression of α2β1-integrin and MOR. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Al-Hasani, R., and Bruchas, M. (2011), ‘Molecular mechanisms of opioid receptor-dependent signaling and behavior’, Anesthesiology, 115(6), pp. 1363–81.

[2] Amaya, F. et al. (2013), ‘Tissue Injury and Related Mediators of Pain Exacerbation’, Curr Neuropharmacol, 11(6), pp. 592-597.

[3] Arslan, M., Gökgöz, N., and Dane, S. (2016), ‘The effect of traditional wet cupping on shoulder pain and neck pain: A pilot study’, Complement Ther Clin Pract, 23, pp. 30–3.

[4] Baker, E., and Zaman, M. (2010), ‘The biomechanical integrin’, J Biomech, 43(1), pp. 38–44.

[5] Cao, H. et al. (2004), ‘Cupping therapy for acute and chronic pain management: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials’, J Tradit Chinese Med Sci, 1(1), pp. 49–61.

[6] Dalton, E., and BJ, V. (2017), ‘Cupping Therapy: An Alternative Method of Treating Pain’, Public Health Open Journal, 2(2), pp. 59–63.

[7] Delmas, P., Hao, J., and Rodat-Despoix, L. (2011), ‘Molecular mechanisms of mechanotransduction in mammalian sensory neurons’, Nat Rev Neurosci, 12(3), pp. 139–53.

[8] Deuis, J., Dvorakova, L., and Vetter, I. (2017), ‘Methods Used to Evaluate Pain Behaviors in Rodents’, Front Mol Neurosci, 10, p. 284.

[9] Dina, O. et al. (2004), ‘Integrin signaling in inflammatory and neuropathic pain in the rat’, Eur J Neurosci, 19(3), pp. 634–42.

[10] Dina, O. et al. (2005), ‘Primary afferent second messenger cascades interact with specific integrin subunits in producing inflammatory hyperalgesia’, Pain, 115(1-2), pp. 191–203.

[11] Fehrenbacher, J., Vasko, M., and Duarate, D. (2012), ‘Models of inflammation: Carrageenan- or complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA)-induced edema and hypersensitivity in the rat’, Curr Protoc Pharmacol.

[12] Hemphill, M. et al. (2011), ‘A Possible Role for Integrin Signaling in Diffuse Axonal Injury’, PLOS ONE, 6(7), p. e22899.

[13] Hynes, R. (2004), ‘The emergence of integrins: a personal and historical perspective’, Matrix Biol, 23(6), pp. 333–40.

[14] Kim, J. et al. (2011), ‘Cupping for treating pain: a systematic review’, Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2011, p. 467014.

[15] Schwartz, M. (2010), ‘Integrins and extracellular matrix in mechanotransduction’, Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 2(12), p. a005066.

[16] Slominski, A. et al. (2000), ‘Corticotropin releasing hormone and proopiomelanocortin involvement in the cutaneous response to stress’, Physiol Rev, 80(3), pp. 979–1020.

[17] Sprouse-Blum, A. et al. (2010), ‘Understanding Endorphins and Their Importance in Pain Management’, Hawaii Med J, 69(3), pp. 70–71.

[18] Subadi, I. et al. (2017), ‘Pain Relief with Wet Cupping Therapy in Rats is Mediated by Heat Shock Protein 70 and ß-Endorphin’, Iran J Med Sci, 42(4), pp. 384–391.

[19] Wang, X. et al. (2006), ‘Role of TGF beta-mediated inflammation in cutaneous wound healing’, J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc, 11(1), pp. 112-7.

Downloads

Published

30.04.2020

How to Cite

Subadi, I., BoyaNugraha, AbdulhadiSuwandi, Sulastri, N., & Susilo, I. (2020). PAIN REDUCTION AFTER WET AND DRY CUPPING THERAPIES: ROLES OF α2β1 INTEGRIN AND μ-OPIOID RECEPTOR IN ANIMAL MODELS. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(2), 4030-4035. https://doi.org/10.61841/dcg76v03