ANALYSIS OF QUALITY IMPROVEMENT TO IMPROVE PRODUCTIVITY OF PISTON RING PVD WITH SIX SIGMA (DMAIC) APPROACH

Authors

  • Ade Astuti Widi Rahayu Industrial Engineering Department Buana Perjuangan University of Karawang Author
  • Neni Triana N. Industrial Engineering Department Buana Perjuangan University of Karawang Author
  • Udin Komarudin Widyatama University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/d0899b96

Keywords:

Six Sigma, quality, piston ring, DMAIC, FMEA

Abstract

PT. NT Piston Ring Indonesia is a manufacturing company that engages in the automotive sector especially in motor vehicle engine components. One of the products produced is Piston Ring. The problem facing the company today is how to improve and maintain product quality in order to minimize defective products that can cause harm to companies, especially on a large scale. This study uses the Six Sigma method as an improvement approach that aims to find and eliminate the causes of defective products that often occur. The stages used are the stages of DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve and Control). At the define stage it is known that there are 15 types of CTQ on the GD-HIGH S. Piston Ring PVD product model. Then at the measure stage it is known that the highest pareto defect diagram is on the type of hakuri defect with a total defect reaching 32.1% with attribute data using a control chart p for which most data are still out of control. DPMO value was 21.888 and sigma value was 3.52. Then proceed to the analysis phase for analysis using a fishbone diagram and FMEA process. Now we know the root cause corrective suggestions made to improve and reduce the number of defects that occur in the product Piston Ring PVD-HIGH GD models S. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Ariani, “D.W. 2003. Manajemen Kualitas Pendekatan Sisi Kualitatif. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

[2] Basterfield, “D.H. 2009. Quality Control. 8th Edition. New Jersey: Prentice – Hall International.

[3] Brue, “Greg. 2002. Six Sigma for Manager. Jakarta: Canary.

[4] Crosby, Philip B. 1979. Quality is Free. New York: McGraw-Hill.

[5] Deming, W. Edwards. 1982. Guide to Quality Control. Cambirdge: Massachussetts Institute of Technology.

[6] Feigenbaum, A. V. 1986. Total Quality Control. 3rd Ed. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.

[7] Garvin David A. 1988. Managing Quality, The New York Press

[8] Gaspersz, “Vincent. 2001. Total Quality Management. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama. “

[9] Hasibuan, M. “2003. Organisasi dan Motivasi Dasar Peningkatan Produktivitas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. “

[10] Iriawan, N. & “S.P. Astuti. 2006. Mengolah Data Statistik Dengan Mudah Menggunakan Minitab 14. Yogyakarta: Andi. “

[11] ISO “8402:1994. Quality Management and Quality Assurance – Vocabulary. “

[12] Juran, J.M. 1993. Quality Planning and Analysis, 3rd Edition. New York: Mc-Graw Hill Book Inc.

[13] Mc Fadden, F.R. 1993. Six Sigma Quality. Quality Progress.

[14] Montgomery, “2005. Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 5th Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[15] Nasution, M.N, 2001. Manajemen Mutu Terpadu (Total Quality Manajemen). Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia. “

[16] Peter S. “Pande, Robert P. Newman, Roland R. Cavanagh. 2003. The Six Sigma Way. Yogyakarta: Andi. “

[17] Pyzdek, “Thomas. 2002. The Six Sigma Handbook. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

[18] Sugiyono. 2004. Metode Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

[19] Wahyuni dan Widhi. 2010. Penerapan Metode Six Sigma dengan Konsep DMAIC sebagai alat pengendali kualitas. Surabaya: Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya.

Downloads

Published

29.02.2020

How to Cite

Astuti Widi Rahayu, A., N. , N. T., & Komarudin, U. (2020). ANALYSIS OF QUALITY IMPROVEMENT TO IMPROVE PRODUCTIVITY OF PISTON RING PVD WITH SIX SIGMA (DMAIC) APPROACH. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(1), 8128-8134. https://doi.org/10.61841/d0899b96