Cooperation model between the management accounting system and the design system
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/fhwdek21Keywords:
Management, cooperation, mechanical engineeringAbstract
A large number of global innovative projects have become implemented nowadays. This article is devoted to the initial stage of testing us the proposed hypothesis existence of an optimal interaction model between the management accounting system and the design system of the innovation project. Such research methods as formalization, hypothetical-deductive method, abstraction, idealization, analysis, synthesis, system approach, specialized survey, document analysis, dialogue was used at the first stage of exploration. The results were received studied in the participation of a representative group of three enterprises. Indirect confirmation of the proposed hypothesis was obtained in addition. It found some problems of cooperation between the management accounting system and the engineering system at the considered enterprises. These cases have become low-level business processes and bad project management. The first stage results allow us to make a guess about the possibility of a further test of the proposed hypothesis to prove it. Output data obtained in accordance with proposed method of allow us to make an assumption, about possibility of implementing subsequent stages of study in order to fully test of hypothesis.
Downloads
References
1. About the project. Home page. (2019). address: http://costengineer.ru/index-eng.html.
2. Agoneze, R., Agoneze, L. & Facin, C. (2014). Analysis of the Factors Affecting Resistance to Changes in Management Accounting Systems. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 25 (66), 214-227. DOI: 10.1590/1808-057x201410810
3. Alsharari, N. (2019). Management accounting and organizational change: alternative perspectives.
International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 27 (4), 1124-1147. DOI: 10.1108/IJOA-03-2018-1394
4. Buchanan, R. (2015). Worlds in the Making: Design, Management, and the Reform of Organizational Culture. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 1 (1), 5-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.sheji.2015.09.003
5. Buchanan, R. (2019). Systems Thinking and Design Thinking: The Search for Principles in the World We Are Making. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 5 (2), 85-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.sheji.2019.04.001
6. Florina, S. & Oros, E. (2015). Aspects Regarding the Use of Modeling in Accounting. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 272-277. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00851-5
7. García-Canal, E., Guillén, M., Fernández, P., & Puig, N. (2018). Imprinting and early exposure to developed international markets: The case of the new multinationals. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 21 (3), 141-152. DOI: 10.1016/j.brq.2018.05.001
8. Gatti, M. (2018). The Impact of Management Accounting Research: An Analysis of the Past and a Look at the Future. International Journal of Business and Management; 13 (5), 47-60. DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v13n5p47
9. Gertler, J. (2018) F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Program. Adress: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/RL30563.pdf.
10. Guarani de Souza, I., Pacheco Lacerda, D., Riehs Camargo, L., Dresch, A. & Sartori Piran, F. (2018). Do the improvement programs really matter? An analysis using data envelopment analysis. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 21 (4), 225-237. DOI: 10.1016/j.brq.2018.08.002
11. Hiebl, M. & Quinn, M. (2018). Management accounting routines: a framework on their foundations.
Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 15 (4), 535-562. DOI: 10.1108/QRAM-05-2017-0042
12. Jin, X., Lei, G. &Yu, J. (2016). Government governance, executive networks and enterprise R&D Expenditure.
China Journal of Accounting Research, 9 (1), 59-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjar.2015.09.001
13. Lendel, V., Hittmar, S. & Siantova, I. (2015). Management of Innovation Processes in Company. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 861-866. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00382-2
14. McDonnell, J. (2015). Gifts to the Future: Design Reasoning, Design Research, and Critical Design Practitioners. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 1 (2), 107-117. DOI: 10.1016/j.sheji.2016.01.007
15. Nikitin, G., Barykin, A., Slyshkin, V. & Tsipes, G. (2016). Engineering and Infrastructure Projects in Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia: Balance of Governance and Management. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 226, 358-364. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.199
16. Pasch, T. (2019). Strategy and innovation: the mediating role of management accountants and management accounting systems’ use. Journal of Management Control, 30 (2), 213–246. DOI: 10.1007/s00187-019-00283-y
17. Rogulenko, T.M. & Smolyakov, О.А. (2017). Organizational-economic problems of interaction systems of aviation enterprises providing the achievements of the established level of economic indicators. Bulletin of the University, 10, 74-79.
18. Roos, G. (2016). Design-Based Innovation for Manufacturing Firm Success in High-Cost Operating Environments. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 2 (1), 5-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.sheji.2016.03.001
19. Serrano-Bedia, A., López-Fernández, C. & García-Piqueres, G. (2018). Complementarity between innovation knowledge sources: Does the innovation performance measure matter? BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 21 (1), 53-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.brq.2017.09.001
20. Sitnikova, S.А. (2017). Information space for management accounting. Bulletin of the Financial University, 21(3), 264-272.
21. Tahri, H. & Drissi-Kaitouni, O. (2015). New Design for Calculating Project Management Maturity (PMM).
Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181, 171-177. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.878
22. van der Poll, H. M. & Mthiyane, Z. (2018). The Interdependence of Risk Management, Corporate Governance and Management Accounting. Southern African Business Review, 22, 1-30. DOI: 10.25159/1998-8125/4344.
23. van Helden, J. & Jan Alsem, K. (2016). The Delicate Interface between Management Accounting and Marketing. Journal of Accounting & Marketing, 5 (3), 1-5. DOI: 10.4172/2168-9601.1000179
24. Whitney, P. (2015). Design and the Economy of Choice. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 1 (1), 58-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.sheji.2015.09.001
25. Xihui Liu, S. & De Bont, C. (2017). Barriers to Strategic Design: A Perspective from China. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 3 (2), 133-145. DOI: 10.1016/j.sheji.2017.09.003
26. Zhao, H., Teng, H. & Wu, Q. (2018). The effect of corporate culture on firm performance: Evidence from China. China Journal of Accounting Research, 11 (1), 1-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjar.2018.01.003
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
