The Liberalization of the Law on Resources: The Case Study of the Health Sector Liberalization in the Post-Reformation Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/j8f4e723Keywords:
Liberalization, law, health, reformationAbstract
The Reformation Era happened on 1997, which marked the end of the New Order era (1967-197). The Reformation Era is a transitional situation, which may be deemed as chaos, as the social, political, and economic situations trigger chaos and degradation. It impacts the legislative products on natural resources formed post-reformation, where it contains liberal and capitalist legal substances. Thus, in the legal practice, it gives justification and legitimization. There is a shift in the legal sovereignty in the legal characters in strengthening the private and individual sectors. Due to the chaotic situation, there is the condition of cosmos which is the amendment of Article 33 of the Republic of Indonesia’s 1945 Constitution. It inserts paragraphs (4) and (5) as articles of capitalism-liberal legitimization in the constitution. The health sector is the sector which experienced the greatest change into liberalization. The health rights in the constitution are cut through legal liberalization. This research uses a doctrinal paradigm or the juridical-normative method.
Downloads
References
1. Ayuningtyas D. Development politics and the privatization policies in health services. J Manajemen Pelayanan Kesehatan. 2009;12(3):118.
2. Soekanto S, Mamudji S. Normative law research: A short review. Jakarta: CV. Rajawali Sumaryono; 1985.
3. Yamin M. Set of Trial Minutes of The Investigating Committee for Preparatory Work for Independence on May 28-July 16, 1945 and Preparatory Committee for Indonesian Independence on August 18 and 19, 1945 regarding the composition of the 1945 constitution. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara Indonesia; 1959.
4. Newbrander W. Private health sector growth in Asia, issues and implication. London: John Willey & Sons Press; 1997. 57 p.
5. Carroll T. Delusions of development: The World Bank and the post-Washington consensus in Southeast Asia. Springer; 2010. 89-95 p.
6. Babb SL, Kentikelenis AE. International financial institutions as agents of neoliberalism. The SAGE handbook of neoliberalism. London: Sage Pub; 2017. 75-82 p.
7. Cahyandari D, Istislam JH. The state’s right for monopoly in the establishment of social security in the perspective of state welfare. J Legal Perspektif. 2013;6(2).
8. Kentikelenis A, Karanikolos M, Papanicolas I, Basu S, McKee M, Stuckler D. Health effects of financial crisis: Omens of a Greek tragedy. Athens: The Lancet; 2011. 1457-1458 p.
9. Douglas T. Liberalized of Health: The Risk of Profit Oriented Health Services. Canberra: Minor Books; 2016.
10. Indonesia’s Ministry of Health. This is the achievements of the Ministry of Health on 2017. 2018. Available from: http://www.depkes.go.id/article/view/18011000004/performance-of-ministry-of-health-in-2017.html
11. Kay JA, Thompson DJ. Privatization: A policy in search of rationale. J Economic. 1987;18-32.
12. Nugraha S. Privatization in many countries: An introduction to understand privatization Jakarta: Penerbit Lentera Hati; 2002. 16-18 p.
13. Waitzkin H, Jasso-Aguilar R, Iriart C. Privatization of health services in less developed countries: an empirical response to the proposals of the World Bank and Wharton School. International Journal of Health Services. 2007;37(2):205-227.
14. Saraswati D, Zulfa Z. Health sector liberalization and the fulfillment of health rights for the Indonesian people: A study of the human rights. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang; 2015. 13 p.
15. Mustajab. The juridical analysis of the legal relations between patients and doctors in a health service. Jakarta: J Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion. 2013;1(4):1-11.
16. Lestari TRP. Hospital services for poor people: A case study of six areas in Indonesia. J Kesehatan Masyarakat Nasional. 2010 Aug;5(1):1-8.
17. Imadasari R. The solution of insurance claim according to ex-gratia. Unnes Law Journal, 2017 Oct;2(2):1.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
