An Analysis of Consumer Preference of Coffee Attributes: The Case Consumers of Local SME’s Coffee Shop Jakarta Greater Area
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/6rfbw116Keywords:
customer preference, coffee attribute, value index, coffee drinker, kedai kopi (local coffee shop)Abstract
With the increasing number of coffee shop and popularity of coffee and drinking coffee among Indonesian people, this study aims to determine consumer preferences for the attributes of coffee drinks and attributes of consumer considerations for buying coffee in local coffee shop run by SME’s. This study used quantitative approach. Since the population of coffee drinkers in greater area Jakarta is indefinite, therefore this research employed non-probability sampling with quota random sampling method. The respondents are selected based on criteria coffee drinker lived in Jakarta who experienced drinking coffee Data were analysed using statistic descriptive. Based on the results of a study of 100 respondents (consumers of coffee drinks) and Likert scale calculation rules for attributes on sub-variables of product characteristics, namely: coffee taste, coffee aroma, serving presentation, serving size, coffee origin (local vs. imported), brand image of coffee shop, and positive feeling about the coffee, showing a total score (TS) of 3232. The highest score is 4000, so the proportion of score (PS) amounting to 80.8% (obtained from calculations 3232/4000 x 100%). This can be interpreted that the consumer's preference for all the attributes that exist in coffee beverage products in the coffee shop in the category of like very much. This means that most respondents like coffee drinks very much. Based on the index of value of coffee attributes, it is found that the highest score is the aroma of coffee, the second highest score is for taste, the third is the attribute of coffee origin, following by the fourth highest score which is brand image coffee shop. The fifth highest score is the (positive) feeling aspect or feeling. The sixth highest score is the size of the serving, and serving presentation positioned seventh, and lastly is the store promotion. This finding implies that the respondent’s preference over coffee and drinking coffee developed based on value criteria. From the eight attributes that were measured; coffee aroma, taste and origin were the three most important attribute of customer preference. These finding give important insight for managerial and business practice to emphasize their strategic orientation and resource allocation to develop that specific areas. This study has not been able to develop comparison between local coffee shop brand and coffee originality (local vs. imported), which it may reveal more robust finding implication on how shop brand may influence the customer preference over coffee. This research contributes to theory and practice in providing method and empirical evidence of how to measure, calculate and rank attributes of consumer coffee preference which are still limited conducted in previous studies in related topic
Downloads
References
1. Aisyah, S., & Hiola, S. K. Y. (2017). Analisis Preferensi Konsumen Terhadap Produk Olahan Ayam di Kota Makasar. Jurnal Galung Tropika, 6(3), 174–184.
2. Arif, G. S. (2017). The Preference Analysis of Coffee Shops and its Customers Towards Coffee Beans in Jakarta. Unpublished Thesis, School of Business and Management Institut Teknologi Bandung.
3. Asosiasi Eksportir dan Industri Kopi Indonesia (AEKI) (2017). Business.com (2019) Retrieved from https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20190822/12/1139918/industri-kedai-kopi-ditaksir-tumbuh-20-tahun- ini
4. Arifin, Bustanul (2013). Ekonomi Kopi Indonesia di Tengah Dinamika Global. Retrieved from http://bustanularifin.wordpress.com,
5. Durevall, D. (2007). Demand for Coffee in Sweden: The Role of Prices, Preferences, and Market Power. Food Policy, 32(5–6), 566–584. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.11.005
6. Hamdan, D., & Santani, A. (2018). Coffee: Karena Selera Tidak Dapat Diperdebatkan. Jakarta: Agromedia Pustaka.
7. International Coffee Organization (2014), Coffee Market Report, Retrieved from http://www.ico.org/documents1314-e.asp
8. Johnson-Kozlow, M., Kritz-Silverstein, D., Barrett-Connor, E., & Morton, D. (2002). Coffee Consumption and Cognitive Function Among Older Adults. American Journal of Epidemiology, 156(9), 842–850. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwf119
9. Khan, B. (2012). Consumer Choice. Retrieved from http://kwhs.wharton.upenn.edu/term/consumer-choice/
10. Kodigehalli, B.V. (2011). Value Chain Analysis For Coffee in Katarnataka, India. [Unublished Thesis]. Humbold University of Berlin.
11. Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2012). Marketing Management. Pearson Education, Inc. (14th Ed.). Boston: Prentice Hall. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781315099200-17
12. Mokrysz, S. (2016). Consumer preferences and behavior in the coffee market in Poland. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 4(4), 75-90
13. Muljaningsih, S. (2011). Preferensi Konsumen dan Produsen Produk Organik di Indonesia. Wacana, Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 14(4), 1–5. Retrieved from http://wacana. ub.ac.id/index.php/wacana/article/ view/266
14. National Statistics Agency (BPS) Indonesia (2017), Indonesian Coffee Statistics 2017, BPS Catalogue: 5504006.
15. Oliver, R. L. and Swan J.E., (1989). Consumer Perceptions of Interpersonal Equity and Satisfaction in Transactions: A Field Survey Approach Journal of Marketing Vol. 53 (2), 21-35
16. Pindyck, R., & Rubinfeld, D. (2018). Microeconomics, 9th Edition, Pearson Series in Economics. NJ
17. Pratiwi, Y., & Ita, S. (2015). The Role of Farmer Cooperatives in the Development of Coffee Value Chain in East Nusa Tenggara Indonesia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Humbold: University of Berlin.
18. Purwanto, E., Hadiwidjojo, D., & Ratnawati, K. (2013). Preferensi Merek Sebagai Pemediasi Pengaruh Kesadaran Merek dan Asosiasi Merek Terhadap Loyalitas Konsumen (Studi produk insektisida merek Asmec 36 EC di Malang Raya). Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 11(2), 186–196
19. Putri, N. E., & Iskandar, D. (2017). Analisis Preferensi Konsumen Dalam Penggunaan social messenger di kota Bandung tahun 2014 (studi kasus: Line, Kakaotalk, Wechat, Whatsapp). Jurnal Manajemen Indonesia, 14(2), 110–127. https:// doi.org/10.25124/jmi.v14i2.356
20. Rachmad (2014). Pengaruh Kualitas Layanan,Pproduk, Serta Persepsi Konsumen Terhadap Kepuasan dan Niat Berperilaku Konsumen. Bogor: Program Pascasarjana Manajemen Bisnis Institut Pertanian Bogor.
21. Rangkuti, F. (2005). Riset Pemasaran. Gramedia Pustaka, Jakarta.
22. Rasmikayati, E., Pardian, P., Hapsari, H., Ikhsan, R. M., & Saefudin, B. R. (2017). Kajian sikap dan perilaku konsumen dalam Pembelian Kopi Serta Pendapatnya Terhadap Varian Produk dan Potensi Kedainya. Mimbar Agribisnis, 3(2), 117–133.
23. Riduwan. (2015). Dasar-Dasar Statistik, Alfabeta. Bandung
24. Sarirahayu, K., & Purwanegara, M. (2017). Coffee preference among young people in Bandung. Proceedings of the 13th IIER International Conference, Seoul, South Korea, 18th-19th November 2017.
25. SCAI (Specialty Coffee Association of Indonesia) (2020), Indonesia Coffee Event (ICE) 2020, Retrieved from https://indopos.co.id/read/2020/02/12/220643/ada-enam-kunci-sukses-ukm-kelola-bisnis-kedai-kopi/
26. Swa.com (2019), Export Prediction of Coffee, Retrieved from https://swa.co.id/swa/trends/ekspor-kopi-indonesia-diprediksi-meningkat-tahun-depan
27. Tarigan, E. B., Pranowo, D., & Iflah, T. (2016). Tingkat kesukaan konsumen terhadap kopi campuran Robusta dengan Arabika. Jurnal Teknologi dan Industri Pertanian Indonesia, 7(1), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.17969/ jtipi.v7i1.2828
28. Wachdijono, Trisnaningsih, U., & Wahyuni, S. (2019). Analysis of consumer over coffee in the era of the Industry 4.0. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian, Agriekonomika, 8(2), 181-193, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/agriekonomika.v8i2.5427
29. Zulfi, J., Kusnandar, K., & Qonita, R. A. (2018). Analisis Preferensi Konsumen terhadap Pembelian Kopi Instan White Coffee di Kecamatan Kebumen Kabupaten Kebumen. SEPA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis, 14(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.20961/ sepa.v14i2.25008.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
