PROACTIVE APPROACHES TO RUNNING COMPETENCIES AND FUNCTIONS BETWEEN SUPERVISION LOGIC AND EXPECTATION LOGIC UNDER HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (Rafidain Bank model)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/th12jy91Keywords:
industrial democracy, human resources management, participative management, , work organization.Abstract
--participative management seems to bring new hope and appears today not only as a vector for mobilizing the energies of the company, but also and above all as the key to a social and organizational peace once aborted and organize the work of men and women, the company seems undeniably attracted Indeed, the image of the absolute monarch and paternalist leader, having the monopoly of knowledge, language, authority and power, now seems unsuitable for news realities of the world of work, where the organization is no longer just an economic institution and technical, but a social arena where all the various actors must find this but between authoritarianism and exploitation on the one hand, servility, revolt and resignation on the other, the participation seems to have become over time, the realm of ambiguity, vagueness, others, participation has entered the era of suspicion, mistrust, skepticism and even of hostility, no doubt because of the long conflicting traditions which once marked the This article suggests that participation as a singular experience is a narrow path, conquest constantly renewed, difficult and full of pitfalls, which encounters many obstacles and which is obviously neither for the anxious nor for the skeptics. Indeed, the immaturity and the complexity of the organizational structures, the choices and the constraints imposed on managers and the cultural revolution that this form of management implies, leads us to believe that participation is a process that requires a framework significant time and which must not only be rooted on solid foundations, but also and above all take into account, whatever its forms, historical, economic realities.
Downloads
References
1. Aktouf, O. (2015). “About management”, Chanlat, A. and Dufour, M. (dir.), The break between business and men, Montreal - Paris, Quebec / America, Organizational Publishing p.363-388.
2. Borzeix, A. and Linhardt, D. (2018). “Participation, a chiaroscuro”. Sociology of work, no 1.
3. Burns, T & Stalker, G. M. (2011). The Management of Innovation. Tavistock Publications, London.
4. Chandler, A. (2009). Company strategies and structures. Paris, Organizational Publishing, 543 pages.
5. Click, M. (2007). “Compensation, participation, ownership, a three-stroke engine”, in:
6. Professions and Companies, April, p. 30.
7. Durkheim, E. (2012). Le Socialisme, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1992, p. 125.
8. Durkheim, E., , Le Socialisme. Paris, Quadrige, PUF, 2004, p. 125.
9. France, 2011. Freeman, R. B. and Rogers, J. (1999). What Workers Want, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University. Goleman, D. & Boyatzis, R. (2003). Emotional intelligence at work. Global Village, 354 pages.
10. Herzberg, F. (1993). The motivation to work. New Brunswick, N.J., U.S.A., Transaction Publishers, 196 pages.
11. Ichniowski, C., Kochan, T. A., Levine, D., Olson, C. and Strauss, G. (2006). “What Works at Work: Overview and Assessment ”, Industrial Relations, vol. 35, no 3, 299-333.
12. Katz, G. and Rosenzweig, J. (2011). Contingency views of organization and management, Chicago: SRA.
13. Laporte, J-P. (2003). Unions and participatory management. ARC Inc. agency editions, 155 pages.
14. Lewin, K. (2013). Dynamic psychology: human relations. Paris, University Press
15. from France, 296 pages.
16. Likert, R. (2011). The participative government of the company. Paris, Montreal: Gauthier-Villars, 263 pages.
17. Linhardt, D. (2014). Business modernization. Paris, La Découverte, p 72.
18. Linhart, D. (2014). Business modernization. Paris, The Discovery.
19. Marcuse, H. (2011). Eros and Civilization: contribution to Freud. Paris, Lettres Nouvelles, Denoel.
20. Marcuse, H. (2007). One-dimensional man: essay on the ideology of industrial society
21. advanced. Paris, Editions du Minuit, 312 pages.
22. Martin, D. (2014). Industrial democracy. Direct participation in companies, Presses
23. French academics.
24. Maslow, A. H. (2017). Motivation and personality. New York, Harper Collins, 293 pages.
25. Mayo, E. (2002). The Human problems of an industrial civilization. Salem, New Hampshire, Ayer, 194 pages.
26. McGregor, D. (2016). The human dimension of the company. Paris, Gauthier-Villars, 203 pages.
27. Roussel, J.-F. (2009). Manage participation. Montreal, CFC Group, 64 pages.
28. Saint-Simon, H. (1985). Social physiology. Volume X, Paris, pp. 175-176.
29. Sériyex, H. (2016). "From the logic of obedience to the logic of responsibility". Future, April, pp. 40-42.
30. Sievers, B. (2006). Beyond motivation, substitute for loss of meaning at work, Organization Studies, 7/4 1986.
31. Smith, A. (2009). Research on the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, Flammarion, Chap. I, pp. 39-40.
32. Walker, K. (2001). “The participation of workers in management at the workshop level” in, Spitaels, G. et al. (2011). Social conflicts in Europe. Marabout Service, Verviers, p. 244.
33. Wang, K. (2004). “Worker participation Matrix” in Lansbury (ed.). Sources of Worker Dissatisfaction in Australia. Monash University, Claytes, pp. 88-110.
34. Weiss, D. (2008). Industrial democracy: co-management or workers' control? Experiences and projects. Organizational Editions, coll. Industrial relations, p.11.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
