The Effects of Using MS Powerpoint as E-Learning Material to the Academic Performance of the Senior High School Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/qjmn2114Keywords:
MS Powerpoint, E-learning, Senior High SchoolAbstract
MS Powerpoint is the most commonly used program in the academe in terms of lesson delivery inside the classroom. Based from different surveys who used MS Powerpoint as their tool in deploying their lessons. It is noted that with the use of the software, students were able to better understand the lessons compared to the traditional ways of delivering the lessons. This assumption enthused the researchers to conduct a study to prove that MS Powerpoint has a relationship and affects the academic performance of students in the Senior High School of Paranaque National High School-Main. True Experimental Design were used by the researchers that selection of participants and assignment of the participants to groups in the study were randomly executed. The purpose of using true experimental research is to determine the significant difference between the Post-test score and the academic performance of two different groups that will expose to the two different teaching environment. The used of MS PowerPoint as teaching material and the used of traditional teaching materials.The general findings revealed that there is a significant difference of point -6.516, -17. 820 and -12. 831 in the pre-test and post-test scores in terms of their subject in Math, English and Science. Interpreting the mean, the study revealed that MS PowerPoint shows an improvement of the experimental group according to Analytic Skills, Evaluative Skills and Attitude are all in “agreed” with a general weighted mean of 3.96, 4.24 and 4.02, respectively. The experimental group has shown an improvement in their academic performance in terms of all three subjects.It is recommended that the principal of the school should encourage the teacher to use MS PowerPoint for their teaching, government should provide tools appropriate technology like PowerPoint to enhance quality of education and the teacher must undergo seminars and workshops for re-training to enable them to use the software properly.
Downloads
References
1. Power Point as an Effective Teaching Tool Education Essay. (2017, November). Retrieved October 2017, from All Answers Ltd.: www.ukessays.com
2. Amare, N. (2006). Effects of Powerpoint Methodology on Context Learning. Retrieved October 2017, from http://www.intangiblecapital.org/index.php/ic/article/view/370/312
3. Bartsch, R. &. (n.d.). Effectiveness of Powerpoint Presentations in Lectures. Retrieved October 2017, from https://www.sciencediret.com/science/article/pii/s0360131503000277
4. Bertram, D. (n.d.). Likert Scale. Retrieved October 2017, from https://www.google.com.ph/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://poincar ematf.bg.ac.rs/~kristina/topic-dane-likert
pdf&ved=0ahUKEwiTy8WFt67WAhVIzLwKHQYvB7UQFggiMAA&usg=AFQjCNEvpDDEfq1y1QW RpphZATYKY1KTWg
5. Borlagdam, B. (2016). An Interactive Computer Learning Environment (ICLE) For Tropical Succulents.
6. Brock, S. (2011). Empowering PowerPoint: Slides And Teaching .Effectiveness. Retrieved from http://www.ijikm.org/Volume6/IJIKMv6p085-094Brock545.pdf
7. Brown, L. &. (n.d.). Powerpoint in the Classroom. Retrieved October 2017, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC520839
8. Charles, J. (2008). College Students View on the Use of Classroom-based PowerPoint Presentation. Retrieved October 2017, from http://www.academia.edu/23588056/College_students_views_on_the_use_of_Classroom-based_PowerPo int_presentations.
9. Clark, J. (2008). Powerpoint and pedagogy: Maintaining students' interest in university lectures. Retrieved October 2017, from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3200/CTCH.56.1.39-46
10. Cramer, K. M. (2007). Virtual Lecture Hall For In Class and Online Sections: A comparison of utilization, perceptions and benefits. Retrieved October 2017, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ768722.pdf
11. D' Angelo, J. M. (2007). Technology in the Classroom: Friend or Foe. Retrieved October 2017, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ790134
12. Davis, K. C. (2012). The Effect of Technology Instruction on the Academic Achievement Grade Students. Retrieved October 2017, from https://www.google.com.ph/search?source=hp&ei=AYW_WZmkIsX1 8QWq1qHIDA&q=the+effects+of+technology+instruction+on+the+academic+achievement+of+fifth+gr ade+students&oq=The+effects+of+technology+instruction+on+th+academic+achievement+of&gs_l=mo bile-gws-hp
13. De Guzman, A. B. (2009). College Students View on the Use of Classroom-based PowerPoint Presentation. Retrieved October 2017, from http://www.academia.edu/23588056/College_students_views_on_the_use_of_Classroom-based_PowerPo int
14. Fernandez, E. (2004). For me, innovative teaching requires the students to use technology and by themselves, realize the significance of the lesson". Retrieved October 2017, from http://dailyedventures.com/index.php/2014/06/03/ernani-fernandez/
15. Gamalel-Din, S. A. (2010). Smart E- Learning: A Greater Perspective; From The Fourth To The Fifth Generation E- Learning. . Retrieved October 2017, from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110866510000071
16. GOLDSTEIN. (2003). POWER POINT AS AN EFFECTIVE TEACHING TOOL EDUCATION ESSAY.
Retrieved October 2017, from HTTPS://WWW.UKESSAYS.COM/ESSAYS/EDUCATION/POWER-POINT-AS-AN-EFFECTIVE-TEACHING-TOOL-EDUCATION-ESSAY.PHP
17. Hammes. (2009). Empowering PowerPoint: Slides andTeaching Effectiveness. Retrieved October 2017, from
https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-280092225/empoweringpowerpoint-slides-and-teaching-ef fectiveness
18. Heffner. (2018). True Experimental Design. Retrieved March 2018, from https://allpsych.com/researchmethods/trueexperimentaldesign/
19. Hlynka, D. &. (1998). A Comparative study on PowerPoinPresentation and traditional lecture method in material understandability, effectiveness and attitude. . Retrieved October 2017, from http://www.academicjournals.org/article/article142
20. Hossein, N. (2005). College Students View on the Use of Classroom-based PowerPoint Presentation. Retrieved October 2017, from http://www.academia.edu/23588056/College_students_views_on_the_use_of_Classroom-based_PowerPo int_presentations.
21. James, K. A. (2006). College Students View on the Use of Classroom-based PowerPoint Presentation. Retrieved October 2017, from http://www.academia.edu/23588056/College_students_views_on_the_use_ of_Classroom-based_PowerPoint_presentations.
22. Kanika, B. (n.d.). PowerPoint As A Teaching Tool: Lecturers Understanding And Practice At The Cambodia University. Retrieved October 2017, from http://119.82.251.165:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/601/Power%20point%20as%20a%20tea ching%20tool.pdf?s
23. Labor, J. (n.d.). College Students View on the Use of Classroom-based PowerPoint Presentation. Retrieved October 2017, from http://www.academia.edu/23588056/College_students_views_on_the_use_of_Classroom-based_PowerPo int_presentations.
24. Leonard, A. S. (2007). Evaluating gender differences of attitudes and perceptions toward PowerPoint for preservice science teachers. Retrieved October 2017, from http://www.ejmste.com/EvaluatingGender-Differencesof-nAttitudes-a
25. Lowry, R. (1999). Effects of PowerPoint Methodology on Context Learning. Retrieved October 2017, from http://www.intangiblecapital.org/index.php/ic/article/view/370/312
26. Maryellen, W. (2012). A Pilot Study to Develop a Reliable Scale That Measure The Influence Of Using Technology On Students; Web, Performance In Learning Statistic. Retrieved October 2017, from http://www.iraj.in/journal/journal_file/journal_pdf/14-322-1490010638112-l120.pdf
27. Mascia, J. (n.d.). How is Microsoft PowerPoint Used in Business? . Retrieved October 2017, from http://www.ehow.com/facts_6833567_microsoft-powerpoint-used-business_.html
28. Miller, R. B. (1998). Effects of text coherence and elaboration on recall of sentence within paragraph. Retrieved October 2017, from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0361476X86900032
29. NORVIG. (2003). POWER POINT AS AN EFFECTIVE TEACHING TOOL EDUCATION ESSAY.
Retrieved October 2017, from HTTPS://WWW.UKESSAYS.COM/ESSAYS/EDUCATION/POWER-POINT-AS-AN-EFFECTIVE-TEACHING-TOOL-EDUCATION-ESSAY.PHP
30. NORVIG. (2003). POWER POINT AS AN EFFECTIVE TEACHING TOOL EDUCATION ESSAY.
Retrieved October 2017, from HTTPS://WWW.UKESSAYS.COM/ESSAYS/EDUCATION/POWER-POINT-AS-AN-EFFECTIVE-TEACHING-TOOL-EDUCATION-ESSAY.PHP
31. Nouri, H. &. (2008). The Effects of PowerPoint Lecture Notes on Student Performance and Attitudes. Retrieved October 2017, from http://aejournal.com/ojs/index.php/aej/article/download/99/69
32. Parette, H. H. (2008). Using Microsoft PowerPoint TM to support emergent literacy skill development for young children at-risk or who have disabilities. Retrieved October 2017, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ820197
33. PATIDAR, J. ((N.D.)). TYPES OF EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH. . Retrieved October 2017, from HTTPS://CIRT.GCU.EDU/RESEARCH/DEVELOPMENTRESOURCES/RESEARCH_READY/XPERI MENTAL/DESIGN_TYPES
34. Rabinowitz, F. M. (2010). The Effective Use of PowerPoint to Facilitate Active Learning. Retrieved October 2017, from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07303084.2010.10598473
35. Ricer, R. E. (2005). Does a high tech (computerized, animated, PowerPoint) presentation increase retention of material compared to a low tech (black on clear overheads) presentation? Retrieved October 2017, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15833719
36. STUDY.COM. (2018). TRUE EXPERIMENT: DEFINITION & EXAMPLES. . Retrieved October 2017,
from
HTTPS://STUDY.COM/ACADEMY/LESSON/TRUE-EXPERIMENTDEFINITIONEXAMPLES.HTM L
37. Sugahara, S. &. (2006). The effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in the accounting classroom. Retrieved October 2017, from http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1591contex
38. Teaching, C. f. (n.d.). Types of Experimental Research. Retrieved. Retrieved October 2017, from http://cirt.gcu.edu/research/developmentresources/research_ready/experimental/design_types
39. The impact of presentation grades on students' experience in the classroom. (n.d.). Retrieved October 2017, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131504001423
40. Velos, R. (2017). Microsoft Philipines Prescom. Retrieved October 2017, from http://www.microsoft.com/philippines/_pressroom/0607_03.aspx
41. Ward, R. M. (2009). Adoption of Web 2.0 technologies in education for health professionals in the UK: Where are we and why? Retrieved October 2017, from ihttp://www.ejel.org/issue/download.html?idArticle=151
42. Wijekumar, K. H. (2009). A multisite cluster randomized trial of the effects of CompassLearning Odyssey math on the math achievement of selected grade 4 students in the mid-Atlantic region. Retrieved October 2017, from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/midatlantic/pdf/REL_20094068.pdf
43. Yu, W. S. (2010). The effects of web-based/non-web-based problemsolving instruction and high/low achievement on students’ problem solving ability and biology achievement. Retrieved October 2017, from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14703291003718927.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
