A REVIEW OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING COURSES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/t0wp2y54Keywords:
learning outcomes, implementation, field study coursesAbstract
This quantitative study dealt with the implementation of the Experiential Learning Courses. It aimed to measure the intended learning outcomes and the level of engagement, the challenges and benefits derived in the implementation of Field Study Courses. A 5-point Likert scale was used to measure the intended outcomes and the level of engagement of the respondents. The results show that the level of the intended learning outcomes measured was interpreted as very much achieved, and the level of participation of all the respondents was interpreted as very much participated. The results show that when experiential learning is implemented according to its processes, the intended learning outcome will be achieved. Further, the results imply that even if there are challenges in the implementation of the field study courses, the overall implementation is still successful.
Downloads
References
1. CMO 30., series 2004, Revised Policies and Standards for Undergraduate Teacher Education Curriculum
2. Maria Rita D. Lucas, Ph.D. Field Study 1 – The Learning Environment, Manila: Lorimar Publishing Inc.
3. Salandan, G.G. (2012) Teaching and the Teacher, Revised Edition, Manila: Lorimar Publishing Inc. pp. 73-74.
4. Smith, M.K. (2003). Introduction to Informal Education. The Encyclopedia of Informal Education, Retrieved from http://www.infed.org on 10-12-2015.
5. Vega, V.A. 2008. Practice teaching handbook. Books Atbp. Publishing Corp, Mandaluyong City, Philippines.
6. As cited by Maria Rita D. Lucas, Ph.D. Field Study 1 – The Learning Environment, Manila: Lorimar Publishing Inc.
7. Kolb, D.A (1984). Experiential Learning Theory as the Source of Learning and Development
8. Haynes, C. (2007) Experiential Learning: Learning by Dong. Retrieved from: http://adulteducation,wikibooks.us on 10-7-2015.
9. Katula, R. A., & Threnhauser, E. (1999, July) Experiential Education in the Undergraduate Curriculum, Communication Education, 48(3), 238.doi 10.1080/0363452990379172
10. Experiential Learning Courses Handbook (2006). A Project of Teacher Education Council of the Department of Education
11. CMO 30., series of 2004, Revised Policies and Standards for Undergraduate Teacher Education Curriculum
12. DepEd Order No.3., series of 2007, Guidelines in the Deployment of Pre Service Teachers under Experiential Learing: Field Study and Practice Teaching.
13. Maria Rita D. Lucas, Ph.D. Field Study 1 – The Learning Environment, Manila: Lorimar Publishing Inc.
14. Sevilla, Consuelo, et.al., 1993. Research Methods. Manila: Rex Book Store. Company, 1959.
15. Good, Carter V., Introduction to Educational Research. New York, Meredith Publishing Company, Inc. 1963.
16. Steinaker, N. W, & Bell, M. R. (1979), The Experiential Taxonomy: A Approach to Teaching and Learning, London: Academe Press
17. CHED Handbook on Typology, OBE, and Institutional Sustainability Assessment (2014). Available online http://www.ched.gov.ph
18. Austin, Jill M, Rust, Diana Zeh. Developing an Experiential Learning Program: Milestones and Challenges. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.htt://www.isetl.org/ijlhe/ 2015 Volume 27, Number 1, 143-153, ISSN 1812-9129
19. Quinn, D., & Shurville, 2009. From Little Things Big Things Grow: Scaling-up Assessment of Experiential Learning. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 26(5),329-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10650740911004769
20. Hudak, P. 2003. Campus Field Exercise for introductory geoscience courses. Journal of Geography, 102(5), 220-225.
21. Drummond, C.N. (2003). Carl Rogers and the Origins of Experiential Learning. Journal of Geosciences Education. Retrieved March 28, 2009. From http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa4089/is_200311/ai_n932477/
22. Petersen, D.J. Hovinga, M. E., Pass, Kohler, C., Ostenstad, R.K., & Katholi, C. (2005). Assuring Public Health Professionals are prepared for the Future: The UAB Public Health Integrated Curriculum. Public Health Reports (1974-), 120(5), 496-503.
23. Michie, M. (1998). Factors Influencing Secondary Science Teachers to Organize and conduct Field Trips. Australian Science Teacher’s Journal, 44, 43-50.
24. Aceron, R. M., & Arellano, A. D. (2018). A Review of field study courses: basis for intervention strategies and activities. Int. J. Rec. Innov. Acad. Res, 2(4), 45-61.
25. Eyler, J., 2009. The Power of Experiential Education. Liberal Education, 95(4),24.
26. Falk J.H., Martin, W.W., & Balling, J.D. (1978). The Novel Field Trip Phenomenon: Adjustment Novel Settings Interferes with Task Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15(2), 127-134)
27. Baldwin, S. C., Butchman, A. M., & Rudisill, M.E. (2007) What Teacher Candidates Learned About Diversity, Social Justice, and Themselves from Service Learning Experiences, Journal of Teacher Education 58(4), 315-327.doi:10.1177/0022487107395258
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
