Sport Education Model: Improving Student Motivation in Physical Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/7z4wk616Keywords:
Sport, Education, Model, Motivation, learningAbstract
The research conducted aims to determine the increase in student motivation after finding the learning process by using a sports education model (SEM) with a traditional learning model. The method used is Nonequivalent Control Group Design which uses 50 students as research subjects which are divided into 2 groups. Based on the findings in this study revealed a sense of comfort in students during learning activities carried out by using the sports education model (SEM) this can be seen from the activities of the involvement of all students in each learning activity with a sense of comfort and pleasure in the learning that they participated in. The results of this study suggest that almost all students involved in the learning process using SEM enjoy the model because the learning presented is not only in the form of understanding of skills but more on personal and social skills. Conclusion Sports Education Model (SEM) is very effective to be used in sports learning because this model can actively involve all students, also SEM presents competition in the learning process so that this will cause very high motivation among students so that the learning process will be very competitive.
Downloads
References
1. Bryan, C. L., & Solmon, M. A. (2012). Student Motivation in Physical Education and Engagement in Physical Activity. Journal of Sport Behavior, 35(3), 267–285.
2. Ginanjar, A., Suherman, A., Juliantine, T., & Hidayat, Y. (2019). SPORTS ORIENTATION DURING LEARNING TEAM OR INDIVIDUAL SPORTS USING A SPORT EDUCATION MODEL. Jurnal
Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(2), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i2.24021
3. Goudas, M., Biddle, S., Fox, K., & Underwood, M. (1995). It ain’t what you do, it’s the way you do it! Teaching style affects children’s motivation in track and field lessons. The Sport Psychologist, 9, 254–264.
4. Hastie, P. (1998). Applied Benefits of the Sport Education Model. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 69(4), 24–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1998.10605530
5. Karisman, V. A., & Friskawati, G. F. (2020). Strike and Fielding Games on Fundamental Movement Skills.
JUARA : Jurnal Olahraga, 5(1), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.33222/juara.v5i1.710
6. Kirk, D., & Macdonald, D. (1998). Situated Learning in Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17(3), 376–387. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.17.3.376
7. Méndez-Giménez, A., Fernández-Río, J., & Méndez-Alonso, D. (2015). Modelo de educación deportiva versus modelo tradicional: efectos en la motivación y deportividad / Sport Education Model Versus Traditional Model: Motivational and Sportsmanship Effects pp. 449-466. Rimcafd, 59(2015), 449–466. https://doi.org/10.15366/rimcafd2015.59.004
8. Metzler, M. W. (1999). Instructional models for physical education. Needam Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
9. Mitchell, S. A. (1996). Relationships between perceived learning environment and intrinsic motivation in middle school physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 15, 368–383.
10. Ntoumanis, N., Pensgaard, A. M., Martin, C., & Pipe, K. (2004). An idiographic analysis of amotivation in compulsory school physical education. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26(2), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.26.2.197
11. Nur, L., Giyartini, R., & Sumardi, S. (2020). Gross Motor Skills: Outbound Activities in Elementary Students. JUARA : Jurnal Olahraga, 5(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.33222/juara.v5i1.781
12. Perlman, D. J. (2011). Examination of self-determination within the sport education model. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 2(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/18377122.2011.9730345
13. Perlman, D., & Karp, G. G. (2010). A self-determined perspective of the Sport Education Model. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 15(4), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980903535800
14. Ramadan, G., Mulyana, N., Iskandar, D., Juniarti, Y., & Hardiyanti, W. E. (2020). Physical Education for Early Childhood: The Development of Students’ Motor in Athletics Basic Motion. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Sport Science, Health, and Physical Education (ICSSHPE 2019). Paris, France: Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/ahsr.k.200214.023
15. Roberts, S., & Fairclough, S. (2011). Observational analysis of student activity modes, lesson contexts and teacher interactions during games classes in high school (11—16 years) physical education. European Physical Education Review, 17(2), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X11420222
16. Romar, J. E., Sarén, J., & Hastie, P. (2016). Athlete-centred coaching using the sport education model in youth soccer. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 16(2), 380–391. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2016.02060
17. Ryan, R. . (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extrinsic of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450–461.
18. Siedentop, D., Hastie, P. A., & van der Mars, H. (2011). Complete guide to sport education (2 ed). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
19. Siedentop, D. (1998). What is Sport Education and How Does it Work? Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 69(4), 18–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1998.10605528
20. Wallhead, T. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2004). Effects of a Sport Education Intervention on Students’ Motivational Responses in Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 23(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.23.1.4
21. Gidado, Abubakar, Korawinwich Boonpisuttinant, Suthamas Kanjanawongwanich, and . "Anti-cancer and Anti-Oxidative Activities of Nigerian Traditional Medicinal Plants/Recipes." Journal of Complementary Medicine Research 10 (2019), 200-211. doi:10.5455/jcmr.20190731050619
22. Buch, N., Goyal, J., Kumar, N., Parmar, I., Shah, V., Charan, J.Prevalence of hypertension in school going children of Surat city, Western India(2011) Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research, 2 (4), pp. 228-232. DOI: 10.4103/0975-3583.89807
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
